User talk:Mateo Chavez

Welcome![edit]

Hi Mateo Chavez! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! →bertux 10:23, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COBRA Films[edit]

Hi Mateo Chavez,

I answered your question at Dutch Wikipedia and took a look at your user page here. That page is meant to tell other users about you, not for encyclopedic content so you need to decide how to proceed. You might use your Sandbox instead, but the content looks not very encyclopedic, much more like an advertisement. First of all it doesn't cite any independent sources to prove the notability of COBRA Films. Also the article does not offer clear and neutral information, viz phrases like resolutely chooses, covers all stages and aims. Aims are irrelevant fort the encyclopedia, only what the company really does and accomplishes counts. What does CF actually do to share risk? What does CF actually do to assist directors?

First of all you need to find authoritative sources that mention COBRA more than passingly and compile an article solely from those sources. The COBRA website can only be used to provide simple facts and minor additional info.

As the English Wikipedia is not my home turf I am not sure about the politics here, but the current content may qualify for speedy deletion (within hours) for abuse of your user page. I would advise you to move the content to your Sandbox; anyway it will require lots of work to become a suitable main space article →bertux 10:23, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the feedback. I switched the wiki to my sandbox and I will change it so it looks less advertising and more neutral. Mateo Chavez (talk) 11:29, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Under the White Mask: the film Haesaerts could have made moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Under the White Mask: the film Haesaerts could have made. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Broc (talk) 15:01, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Broc, Thank you for your feedback. Still, I had a question about the comment that there are not enough sources for publicity. I know it is not the most well-known film but I have already referred to five different sources. I was wondering what else would be needed to make this work a full-fledged wiki? Thanks in advance and kind regards. Mateo Chavez (talk) 08:43, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cobra Films moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Cobra Films. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Broc (talk) 15:04, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Matthias De Groof moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Matthias De Groof, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Maliner (talk) 09:34, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Matthias De Groof (May 24)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Broc were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Matthias De Groof and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Broc (talk) 13:23, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mateo Chavez! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Broc (talk) 13:23, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]