User talk:Martino447

June 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Diezani Alison-Madueke has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Diezani Alison-Madueke was changed by Martino447 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.85642 on 2018-06-06T23:43:57+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:43, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Hamdan bin Mohammed Al Maktoum has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Hamdan bin Mohammed Al Maktoum was changed by Martino447 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.87582 on 2018-06-17T09:26:32+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:26, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Hamdan bin Mohammed Al Maktoum. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 09:56, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Raymond F. Chandler has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Raymond F. Chandler was changed by Martino447 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.865537 on 2018-06-26T00:26:58+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:27, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Raymond F. Chandler. Thank you. Coryphantha Talk 00:45, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by IVORK was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Raymond F. Chandler instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

If please make any corresponding changes to the existing article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Martino447/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Martino447/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— IVORK _Discuss 01:19, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Martino447! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — IVORK _Discuss 01:19, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Raymond F. Chandler. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Coryphantha Talk 01:28, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Hamdan bin Mohammed Al Maktoum. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. MutchyMan112 (talk) 08:55, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did with this edit to Hamdan bin Mohammed Al Maktoum. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Adam9007 (talk) 00:00, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Diezani Alison-Madueke has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Diezani Alison-Madueke was changed by Martino447 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.937458 on 2018-08-11T09:48:00+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:48, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Diezani Alison-Madueke, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 09:57, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Contact

Hello. If you add any more gmail, contacts, or any links not substantiated by reliable sources I'll block you from editing indefinitely. Thanks. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 23:39, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 19:33, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at w:en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Martino447. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. GeneralNotability (talk) 23:33, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]