Jump to content

User talk:Mark Jhomel/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2

Slow down

Please stop tagging articles with speedy deletion criteria. In the last 5 minutes I've removed ~3 incorrect G1 tags, and from looking at your contributions, you're still adding them. It's getting a tad disruptive, and I suggest you slow down and have another read over what each of the criteria cover. For starters, G1 does not cover poor writing. Anarchyte (work | talk) 07:57, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

I will use Propose for Deletion instead. All of the page fall under G1 is pure vandalism and/or advertisement. Mark Jhomel (talk) 07:58, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
G11 is used for advertisements and G3 is for vandalism. These do not fall under G1, though they might fall under other criteria: Facebook Expands Ad Testing On Messenger Globally, Jangra, Z aka Zeus, Alok Pandey. Anarchyte (work | talk) 08:06, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
I'll keep that in mind. Assume good faith and thanks for correcting my mistakes. Have a nice day. Mark Jhomel (talk) 08:08, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
Thanks. Have a great day yourself, too :) Anarchyte (work | talk) 08:09, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Please exercise better judgement

Seriously? Tagging an article seconds after creation, especially when this article is referenced to a reliable source, has clear notability as an archbishop in a major diocese and prince of an imperial dynasty, and when it is clear that the article has potential for expansion (which should be evident when it is created with the comment "stub for now") is essentially disruptive behaviour. This is really unexpected of someone who has been active in WP for three years. In future please take the time to weigh the merits and potential of each article carefully before engaging in drive-by tagging. Cheers, --Constantine ✍ 14:06, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

@Cplakidas:Assume good faith. My bad. Have a nice day, sir. MARK JHOMEL💣💥 14:09, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
WP:AFG does not absolve one of editorial responsibility. I never assumed bad faith on your part, but merely pointed out that you exercised bad judgment. Have a nice day. Constantine ✍ 14:13, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Malinaccier (talk) 16:27, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Thank you so much for giving me such oppurtunity. Have a nice day. :) MARK JHOMEL💣💥 20:52, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Digdarshan

Just a friendly heads up. I declined your speedy deletion request on Digdarshan because A7 does not apply to a publication.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 02:19, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

Nagorno-Karabakh presidential election, 2017

Also declined the speedy on Nagorno-Karabakh presidential election, 2017. A presidential election in a disputed territory is a good-faith claim of notability -- I've added more sources to back that up.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 02:36, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

Twitter Clerihews

Hello -- I am not experimenting or advertising. Where do you think the Clerihew page should link to the resurgence of the form on the Wiki page?

I just tried something else -- does this work?

Hello. Welcome to Wikipedia. I reverted your edits since you used social media as a source. Remember that social medias are self-written, that's why we want to avoid it for our references. You can read more at Wikipedia Verification Guidelines. Thank you for your contributions and happy editing! Mark Jhomel (talk) 13:31, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Ok thank you -- a link to a fluid indicator (hashtag #clreihew) on Twitter is a clear marker of popularity without reference to any specific practitioner. This seems better. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.160.116.178 (talk) 13:37, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Also, please see the guidelines about WP:NOTSOCIALMEDIA and sourcing via Twitter at WP:TWITTER. Thank you. Mark Jhomel (talk) 13:43, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Maminydjama Maymuru

Hello Mark Jhomel. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Maminydjama Maymuru, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not a test page. Thank you. Mz7 (talk) 16:09, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Ilya Sibiryakov

Hello Mark Jhomel. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Ilya Sibiryakov, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not a test page. Thank you. Mz7 (talk) 16:17, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Suyog stationery

Hello Mark Jhomel, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Suyog stationery, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not a test page. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Mz7 (talk) 16:21, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

I apologize for the flurry of three automated notification here. For each of the above, these looked more like legitimate attempts at creating an article, rather than editing tests. WP:CSD#A7 would've been better. Mz7 (talk) 16:23, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

RfA

Thanks for supporting my run for administrator. I am honored and grateful. ) Cullen328 Let's discuss it 06:30, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Twinkle

Twinkle has an option to keep a log of your CSD nominations. In light of some of the comments on your talk page (and a declined CSD I came across earlier) I think it would be useful for you to turn on the CSD log option so you can review the outcomes of your nominations. You can also log PROD nominations, even to the same log as your CSDs. Hope that helps, Cabayi (talk) 19:24, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

@Cabayi: I will keep that in mind. Thanks. Mark Jhomel (talk) 01:25, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

References

Hi Mark, thanks for your note about my deletion on Twevele Tribes Communities. I deleted those external references because they were unrelated to the group. There's no mention of those groups in the article, and no apparent link. Do you see any reason to keep them in? Sorry, i'm not an expert on wikipedia 64.22.52.187 (talk) 12:53, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Hey, hello there. I want to thank you for contacting me here in my talk page. Okay, so I reverted your edits on that page because you blanked its references, and you told me you did that because it is unrelated to the article. Now, I suggest that instead of removing the unrelated references, you should replace it by the related one, right? For that case, you are contributing to Wikipedia! :) Cheers and happy editing. Mark Jhomel (talk) 01:38, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

About the deletion of anirudha singh page

Dear Sir, 

       My Anirudha Singh page is deleted from the Wikipedia. while i have mentioned all the information is correct according to my knowledge. I have search about the Anirudha Singh from social website news paper and from the news channel. And a no of people collect the information and encourage me to post information on wikipedia. so i did it...

it is my humble request to you please post this information on wikipedia or guide me how can i post it.. if i am wrong anywhere please text me.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Khursheedazmi (talk • contribs) 18:13, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

@Khursheedazmi: Hello there, do not call me sir because even though we're having serious discussions here in Wikipedia, we do not need to be so formal, so just call me Mark. :) Okay, about the issue, I placed {{refimprove}} and {{unsourced}} tags in your created page because it lacks reference. Since no reference has been added to your page after a couple of hours, it was deleted by the one of the administrator because it looks like self-published article. I suggest that you shall create your page first in your sandbox so you can make it good enough. Also, you can ask for my help anytime and I will help you to the fullest extent of my knowledge. Cheers and happy editing! Mark Jhomel (talk) 01:45, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

CVUA

Hi Mark Jhomel. It's been more than a week since we last spoke with each other regarding User:Mz7/CVUA/Mark Jhomel. If you are still interested in continuing the program, please let me know. Mz7 (talk) 21:58, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Yes sir. I am really interested in continuing the program. My apologies because I'm not able to open Wikipedia for a couple of days because of family problems. I am asking for your forgiveness. I'll be back to you sir when everything is fine. Give me atleast 3 days to settle those things out. Have a nice day and thank you for understanding. Mark Jhomel (talk) 12:51, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
Sure thing. Let me know when you're back. Mz7 (talk) 05:55, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

A1

Hi. If you believe that Ben Adams has released his photograph on an appropriate licence, then please uploaded indicating this. Please do not claim copyright ownership of photographs that you clearly do not own copyright on. Thanks. --Escape Orbit (Talk) 20:40, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

production car speed record

The criteria for inclusion of the list have been discussed extensively over the years, please see the talk page. I'd be happy to discuss it again, but my inclinations is to INCREASE the number of identical cars produced to be eligible. How many Agera's have been made that have the engine power tor each the claimed speed? I'll revert your recent changes unless you take this to the talk pageGreglocock (talk) 08:52, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Mark Jhomel. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Creating an Article

Hello, i want to created an about an indian Televison show name = Chakradhari Ajay Krishna Please allow me for using article creation it's requst Please help me.thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Active - WIKI (talk • contribs) 07:57, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Mark Jhomel. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mark_Jhomel/Archive_2&oldid=1143155087"