User talk:Marikagirl12

Ali Lohan

I reverted your change for two reasons:

The text of the article says she hasn't accepted the role.
If you click on troll, you will see that it doesn't take you to a movie

—Kww(talk) 20:34, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You need a source that passed WP:RS for Interpersonal, too. Last time I looked, there weren't any.—Kww(talk) 21:01, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced information

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Ali Lohan. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, your edits will be considered vandalism and you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ward3001 (talk) 04:40, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Shia LaBeouf, did not appear to be constructive and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. DiverseMentality^(Boo!) 02:45, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Selena Gomez, you will be blocked from editing. Edgehead 5150 01:04, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009

A final (last) warning indicates your edits are so unconstructive that a Wikipedia administrator should consider blocking your account from editing.

This is a final warning. If you make another edit -- giving no valid explanation -- as you did here [1] in Eiza González, it will be considered vandalism, and you will be blocked. Piano non troppo (talk) 12:13, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Eiza-gonzalez.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Eiza-gonzalez.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Polly (Parrot) 16:31, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:EMI Record signing.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:EMI Record signing.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Polly (Parrot) 20:02, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Eiza Gonzalez Press conference with Mujeres Asesinas 2 Costars.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Eiza Gonzalez Press conference with Mujeres Asesinas 2 Costars.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Polly (Parrot) 20:02, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Preview button

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edit(s) to Eiza González, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. Antonio López ^(desu) 01:25, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please use the preview button more to minimize the amount of saves, you are clogging up the recent changes and the page history on the article seen [here]. Antonio López ^(desu) 04:11, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

July 2009

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Eiza González, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Antonio López ^(desu) 04:34, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Eiza González, without resolving the problem that the template refers to may be considered vandalism. Further edits of this type may result in you being blocked from editing Wikipedia. Antonio López ^(desu) 04:49, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Eiza Gonzalez.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Eiza Gonzalez.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Polly (Parrot) 19:12, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Antonio López ^(desu) 19:59, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your image uploads

I have deleted the images that you have uploaded, which were clearly taken from other websites. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and cannot accept images that are not freely licensed. If you have any questions, you are welcome to contact me on my talk page. J Milburn (talk) 18:57, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Antonio López ^(desu) 19:22, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to Eiza González, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Antonio López ^(desu) 17:30, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Eiza González. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. You appear to be in a dispute with another user about the neutrality of part of this article. In future, please take any disputes to the article's talk page and do not remove the NPOV tag until the issue has been resolved. Thank you. Bettia (bring on the trumpets!) 08:33, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Vidas al Máximo

A tag has been placed on Vidas al Máximo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.

September 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Jeremih has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Jusda fax 06:03, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Shraddha Kapoor, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. --Geniac (talk) 03:52, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Shraddha Kapoor and Sabyasachi Mukherjee.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Shraddha Kapoor and Sabyasachi Mukherjee.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Geniac (talk) 03:56, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Shraddha Kapoor

Hello, Your recently edits to Shraddha Kapoor, has been reverted by me. Your previous edits on the page was an act of Vandalism, which you had changed the birth date of a living people biography with outsource and unreliable sources proved This is a final warning. If you do it again, you will be block. Beware!!

Archana Ramdonee 16:39, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Shraddha Kapoor does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! -- L o g X 17:16, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm LogX. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living person on Shraddha Kapoor, but that you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- L o g X 17:18, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Shraddha Kapoor. Thank you. -- L o g X 17:51, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop editing the Shraddha Kapoor article until you have a better grounding in Wikipedia's policies regarding biographies of living persons and copyright. You are repeatedly adding information that is either entirely unsourced or poorly sourced as well as adding images that are copyright violations. Many editors have left messages here explaining why these edits are a problem, yet you do not respond to or heed any of the advice given. If you do continue to violate the biography, copyright, and sourcing policies you will likely find your account blocked, so please do read through the messages and links provided to you here.--Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 21:28, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This reference you included to support the second quote you added in this edit does not contain the quote you added. In addition, adding paragraphs of quotes regarding a biography subject's personal love life is hardly encyclopedic. I am asking you again - please stop adding material to the article until you have a better understanding of these, important, policies. It would also be helpful if you would actually communicate with the editors attempting to engage you in conversation. If you continue editing while disregarding policy, your account will be blocked.--Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 22:41, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for violations of the Biographies of Living Persons policy. Despite the counsel provided above, you are still adding unsourced information to biography articles, and perhaps even more concerning is that you are falsifying sources when you do included them. In this edit you added another frivolous quote regarding Kapoor's romantic/personal life and referenced it to this website; in reality the quote is a mishmash of the actual quote and your own words. This absolutely cannot happen. Please take these 24 hours to review WP:BLP, WP:V, and WP:RS. It is imperative that you gain a better understanding of these policies prior to editing any additional biography articles. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 15:38, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shraddha Kapoor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pragmatist (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:48, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add defamatory content, as you did at Shraddha Kapoor, you may be blocked from editing. -- L o g X 21:18, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vidas al Máximo

The article Vidas al Máximo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable film

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BOVINEBOY2008 00:44, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vidas al Máximo

The article Vidas al Máximo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to meet notability requirements as per WP:NF

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jmertel23 (talk) 15:15, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]