User talk:Mamayuco

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Mamayuco! Thank you for your contributions. I am Gorthian and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! — Gorthian (talk) 04:36, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Arauco Basin

Hello! Welcome to Wikipedia, thank you for editing! Reading quickly over your article it seems that there are a few SPAG (spelling, punctuation and grammar) mistakes, because it is a young article there is no point in tagging it so I'm just letting you know. Also if this article exists in another language please consider connecting it using the "Add links" hyperlink on the left-hand-side column. Many thanks again, and if you need any help please let me know on my talk page at User:Nicnote. Best, --Nicnote (talk) 21:00, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Subduction erosion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Transgression. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 28 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Ranquil Formation page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Arauco Basin

On 31 July 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Arauco Basin, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Arauco Basin is an uplifted part of the continental shelf of Chile? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Arauco Basin. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Arauco Basin), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Subduction erosion) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Subduction erosion, Mamayuco!

Wikipedia editor Herostratus just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for your erudition in creating this article!

To reply, leave a comment on Herostratus's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Disambiguation link notification for August 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited La Negra Formation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fractional crystallization. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Caleta Herradura Formation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nonconformity. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for La Negra Formation

On 10 September 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article La Negra Formation, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Jurassic La Negra Formation in northern Chile contains products of submarine volcanism? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/La Negra Formation. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, La Negra Formation), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Uruguayan dyke swarms

On 8 October 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Uruguayan dyke swarms, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that swarms of dykes have intruded into Uruguay? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Uruguayan dyke swarms. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Uruguayan dyke swarms), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Mamayuco. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Pan de Azúcar Formation

Hi, I'm Space Infinite. Mamayuco, thanks for creating Pan de Azúcar Formation!

Lithopsian has just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. THE INFINITE SPACE X 11:33, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.^[1] The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.^[2] The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to [email protected].

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 19:25, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
^ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or [email protected]. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 08:25, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cola de Zorro Formation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Volcano-sedimentary. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Miocene, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Transgression. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Patagonia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Transgression. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:06, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipiping

Please see muy edit to to correctly wikipipe to a more specific term. Simply piping from a general term to a more specific one is a confusion for readers. Please see WP:PIPE for more info. Staszek Lem (talk) 19:40, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Staszek Lem, I got it. Mamayuco (talk) 20:23, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Mamayuco. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Magmatism

Hi, I closed and implemented the CFD anniversary managing to rename multiple categories from "igneous petrology" to "magmatism", see Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2018_April_17#Magmatism_not_igneous_petrology. There are several parent categories that now do not match, see Category:Igneous petrology, so please follow up the last set. Also, Category:Eoarchean igneous petrology was apparently omitted from the nomination. – Fayenatic London 14:31, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fayenatic, thank you. Las time I saw the discussion it had turned into a dead point, but Im glad the renaming went on. I will check parent categories. Mamayuco (talk) 21:16, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Inland dune, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blowout (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 31

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tectonic evolution of Patagonia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Backstop (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Backstop wtf

You've provided a definiiton for a Backstop. Doesn't make much sense to me. You say "a backstop is the transition between deforming rock or sediment that is pushed by a coherent mass of rock". Normally, when one uses the word "between", one defines the x & y that the thing described is between. So from your definition we know the x is "deforming rock or sediment". Is the y "a coherent mass of rock"?

Could you take a longer look at the article and see if you can explain the concept a little more fully, such that non-geologists might have a clue. thx. --Tagishsimon (talk) 02:15, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Backstop (geology)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Backstop (geology).

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process.

Please only create articles with references.

To reply, leave a comment here and ping me.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 08:12, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Backstop (geology) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Backstop (geology), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 08:12, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Mamayuco. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Backstop (geology) (November 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jovanmilic97 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please add more references and expand.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Backstop (geology) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Backstop (geology), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jovanmilic97 (talk) 22:38, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mamayuco! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jovanmilic97 (talk) 22:38, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Backstop (geology) has been accepted

Backstop (geology), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 04:08, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Osorno–Llanquihue Basin

Hello, Mamayuco,

Thanks for creating Osorno–Llanquihue Basin! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

This has been tagged for 2 issues.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 20:59, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Non-existent categories

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Category:Argentine earth scientists, please make sure that the category page actually exists. In some cases, it may be appropriate to create a new category in accordance with Wikipedia's categorization guidelines, but it is usually better to use the most specific available existing category. It is never appropriate to leave a page categorised in a non-existent category, i.e. one whose link displays in red. You may find it helpful to use the gadget HotCat, which tests whether a category exists before saving a change. Thank you. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 22:23, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Boletín de la Sociedad Geológica del Perú

The article Boletín de la Sociedad Geológica del Perú has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 13:44, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Boletín de la Sociedad Geológica del Perú for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Boletín de la Sociedad Geológica del Perú is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boletín de la Sociedad Geológica del Perú until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Randykitty (talk) 07:20, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Pampean flat-slab

Hello! Your submission of Pampean flat-slab at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Drmies (talk) 16:05, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Pampean flat-slab

On 8 August 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Pampean flat-slab, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Pampean flat-slab is an area of low angle subduction in South America, associated with a large volcano-free gap in the Andean Volcanic Belt? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Pampean flat-slab. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Pampean flat-slab), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2010 Chile earthquake, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Concepción (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Mines in Cochabamba Department

A tag has been placed on Category:Mines in Cochabamba Department requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:12, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:48, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mining referendum

The article Mining referendum has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable topic.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 22:40, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 19

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Pica, Chile

added a link pointing to Shaft

Puquios

added a link pointing to Shaft

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Chilean innovators

A tag has been placed on Category:Chilean innovators requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:37, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from 1991 Antofagasta mudflows. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. --John B123 (talk) 18:13, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Antofagasta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Salpeter.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Atacama Desert, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Calama.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Porphyry copper deposit, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cerro Colorado.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve André Sougarret

Hello, Mamayuco,

Thank you for creating André Sougarret.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The sources provided contain only brief mentions of the subject. They do not establish notability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Kudpung}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:03, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง , this is pure nonsence. Please read again, being president CEO of Codelco and having led the world-famous 2010 do imply notability. Breifness and notability are two different things. Mamayuco (talk) 15:25, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No one is disputing that Sougarret might be a noteworthy individual. However, the brief mentions in the sources do not establish notability per the very strict requirements for WP:BLP. Is there any reason why you are unable to provide multiple, more substantial sources that discuss the Sougarret in depth? Sources must be independent and verifiable but they do not not need to be in English. Unfortunately, at NPP we only assess what we are given, it's not within our scope and time would not permit us to improve articles and provide additional sources. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 18:05, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are wrong Kudpung กุดผึ้ง, brief mentions in the sources can establish notability, and the policy that is to be referred to is Wikipedia:Notability (people), not WP:BLP. There it reads If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability. Mamayuco (talk) 18:12, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry but I can't do more to help you. Notability (people) is only a guideline whereas Biographies of living persons is a policy and overrides it. In fact it's one of the strictest policies on the English Wikipedia. In my opinion, the article certainly has potential but I cannot pass it for general indexing so it will stay in the queue for another reviewer to assess. You might be able to obtain help at the Teahouse, or bring it up at the BLP noticeboard (see the article's talk page). Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 18:44, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

André Sougarret moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, André Sougarret, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 09:43, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: André Sougarret (October 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:André Sougarret and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 09:01, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Guayacán, Chile" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Guayacán, Chile and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 24#Guayacán, Chile until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. MB 03:21, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: André Sougarret has been accepted

André Sougarret, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 19:28, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dentren. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 22:53, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.

[2] Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

[1]

[2]