User talk:Malwarevoc

Overlinking

Per MOS:OVERLINK please stop linking words everyone knows. Miner Editor (talk) 08:11, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Anusha Rai moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Anusha Rai, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dewritech (talk) 12:47, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sir. will you please tell me what is the issue with this article. i have placed proper citations properly placed with all the proofs Subjects name also mention on other Wikipedia pages in which she worked. please help me for this if there is an mistake. I dont think so there is any mistake. Malwarevoc (talk) 13:21, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gaurav Dewasi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gaurav Dewasi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gaurav Dewasi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Oaktree b (talk) 13:48, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anusha Rai (July 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This page has been moved back from article space to draft space. Please read the comments by the draftifying reviewer and address them. Do not resubmit this draft without addressing the comments of the previous reviewer. If you do not understand why this article was sent back to draft space, please ask the reviewer rather than simply resubmitting.

You may ask for advice on how to improve this draft at the Teahouse or on the talk pages of any of the reviewers. (The declining reviewers may advise you to ask for advice at the Teahouse.)

If this draft is resubmitted without any improvement or with very little improvement, it will probably be rejected.

See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anusha Rai (2nd nomination).

This draft, as written, does not appear to indicate that one of the biographical notability criteria is satisfied. If one of the criteria is satisfied, please revise this draft appropriately, with a reliable source, if necessary stating on the talk page or in AFC comments which criterion is met, and resubmit. It is the responsibility of the submitter to show that a subject satisfies a notability criterion.

You may ask for advice about the biographical notability criteria at the Teahouse.

In particular, see and refer to WP:NACTOR for notability, which is the guideline that the subject should be evaluated against.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anusha Rai and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 05:31, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Malwarevoc! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 05:31, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Hello Malwarevoc. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Malwarevoc. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Malwarevoc|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message.

Since multiple articles that you have created (example 1, example 2) are based on sponsored content, as since it is unlikely that people would naturally gravitate toward such content to have the patience to study it and try to summarize it for encyclopedic purposes, I believe that you are paid to edit Wikipedia in order to promote individuals. —Alalch E. 17:25, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aryan Khan (actor) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aryan Khan (actor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aryan Khan (actor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Worldiswide (talk) 02:55, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Amansharma111 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Amansharma111. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 14:55, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Brijesh Singh (Indian Politician)

Hello, Malwarevoc, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Sohom Datta, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Brijesh Singh (Indian Politician), should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brijesh Singh (Indian Politician).

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Sohom Datta}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Sohom (talk) 10:22, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Anusha Rai

Hello, Malwarevoc. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Anusha Rai, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:05, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Balachandar Karthikeyan

Hello, Malwarevoc. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Balachandar Karthikeyan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:05, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Balachandar Karthikeyan

Hello, Malwarevoc. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Balachandar Karthikeyan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:24, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For creating Gaurav Dewasi's page

Dear Malwarevoc ji, I am from Ganesh Pali Rajasthan. We would like to request you if we can create Gaurav Devasi's page. A lot of information about him is available on Google. His Google panel is also available. We need your help so that with your help we can release the page. You are a senior wiki user and you have a lot of experience because we have to make his page perfect so that no one deletes it under L2 103.162.178.238 (talk) 05:47, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]