User talk:Makaveli1993

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Makaveli1993, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like The Demon of River Heights, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 05:52, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article The Demon of River Heights has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

how many "23rd installments" are there, according to you? RE:Mystery in the Outback

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 05:52, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article Mystery in the Outback has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

How many "23rd installments " are there, according to you? RE:The Demon of River Heights

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 05:53, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article Terror in the Outback has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

How many "23rd installments" are there according to you? RE:Mystery in the Outback, The Demon of River Heights

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 05:55, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article The Demon of River Heights has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication this exists. the company's webpage is advertising the 21st installment, and gives no indication of #22, let alone #23 [1]

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 06:05, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated The Demon of River Heights, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Demon of River Heights. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 06:37, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to The Demon of River Heights. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 07:33, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Demon of River Heights, you will be blocked from editing. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 07:57, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to The Demon of River Heights. Shadowjams (talk) 08:04, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reported[edit]

I have reported you and your sock (User:Sod1993) to AVI Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 08:41, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Article for Deletion discussion templates[edit]

Hi there. Please don't remove AfD templates from articles, as this may be considered vandalism. Use the link in the template to go to the relevant page where the discussion is taking place. Thanks. GedUK  09:16, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Look -- you've been warned before by someone with more patience and kindness than I possess. Don't stretch it. Do not remove the AfD-template. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 11:46, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
And don't mess with others' AfD-!votes either. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 11:49, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

This, combined with your other edits, pushed it way too far. Materialscientist (talk) 11:54, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Mystery in the Outback, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mystery in the Outback. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 09:01, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]