User talk:Maheshwari Technology

May 2017

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia talk:File Upload Wizard, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 05:10, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Maheshwari Technology

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:Maheshwari Technology, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be blatant advertising which only promotes or publicises a company, product, group or service. This is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages — user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources or advertising space. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Dolotta (talk) 05:21, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Maryland Correctional Institution for Women. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Dolotta (talk) 05:28, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bilsi.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Bilsi was changed by Maheshwari Technology (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.951587 on 2017-05-10T05:33:43+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:33, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. DMacks (talk) 05:47, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]