User talk:Luke Teh

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. JoeSmack ^Talk 06:25, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming, and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising. Thanks. — Nearly Headless Nick ^{L} 10:28, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think I have added any inappropriate external links... I have noticed many other book entries have reviews listed as an external link as a source of further information, I have simply done the same where I feel an entry warrants it. Adding links is not all I have done, I have also created entries for books that previously weren't listed - eg. Outposts and Playing Beattie Bow.

Proposed deletion of Outposts: Journeys to the Surviving Relics of the British Empire[edit]

The article Outposts: Journeys to the Surviving Relics of the British Empire has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Nn book

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Amisom (talk) 22:24, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]