User talk:Loulou121

Problems with upload of File:Salisb.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Salisb.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:05, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Guildhall.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Guildhall.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:06, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Logofinal.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Logofinal.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:06, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Salisbury coa.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Salisbury coa.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:07, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:SCC new offices.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:SCC new offices.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:09, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Salisbur.gif[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Salisbur.gif. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:10, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:A36 into salisbury.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:A36 into salisbury.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 11:10, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Inserting Images[edit]

Hi Loulou,

I see you've worked out how to insert images, but as you might have noticed on your talk page, there are some additional details to add. Images on Wikipedia have to have a license of some sort attached to it, explaining who owns the image, where it came from, and whether it can be used in other media. I only ever upload my own pics as it's much easier to work out the licensing (I authorise them for free and open use (Public Domain)) but there are other levels. Best place to check them is probably Wikipedia:Image use policy, not the greatest read, but fairly easy to follow.

Looking through the images you've uploaded, I suspect (but admittedly not sure) that you may be all right with the File:A36 into salisbury.jpg as it seems to be from a site that allows public domain use. On the other hand you may have a problem with Salisb.jpg, as it came from a Turkish(?) site it's harder to gauge its terms of use (unless you speak Turkish and understand it!). Same with File:Guildhall.jpg which may be owned by Salisbury District Council or Wiltshire Coucil and may require permission. Either way, the terms of use need to be attached to each image otherwise Wikipedia Administrators may delete the images lest they don't conform to Wiki rules (and the onus is on the uploader to provide the info, not the admin).

When inserting a picture into an article, it's best to use a size consistent with the rest of the article. The A36 image was much larger than the images in the rest of the Salisbury article which is why I reverted it to thumb size. In the main it seems that thumb is the best size for an image in the main body of the article, and 300px is good for articles at the start or in the infobox.

This leads me on to my main reason for posting to you. Looking through the edit history of Salisbury a minute ago I noticed that I'd inadvertently slashed into some of your contributions mere minutes after you'd uploaded them. I've made a number of edits to the page today (it really is in need of some work as you've probably noticed) and I apologise for appearing to 'screen' your work. I'd actually just started going through the article this morning when I saw that bit and decided to clean it up first. Without wishing to appear patronising, Wiki aims to avoid PoV text. So (although I agree with you) lines like "the city is not up to scratch anymore, i.e. the bad roads and the traffic buildup on the bad roads" and "They take you the most scenic or practical route around the city for an improved flow of cars or to help local businesses" don't really fit unless someone important enough has said it (plus you slightly contradicted yourself in that paragraph!).

I notice you seem to have an interest in Salisbury, as I do, so I'd be happy to work together to improve the article. The history section is in desperate need of attention and so is the government section I've just started. Most important thing is to provide references to any potentially controversial statement we include. I'd be happy to help you out with any other issues or queries you might have. Regards Psychostevouk (talk) 18:06, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Shard of glass.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Shard of glass.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 19:27, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Manie Hanna[edit]

A tag has been placed on Manie Hanna requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Kingpin¹³ (talk) 09:06, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kartina Darg-Forsyth[edit]

Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Teapotgeorge^Talk 09:40, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

July 2009[edit]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page or image, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Nja²⁴⁷ 10:19, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

City status of Salisbury[edit]

Hello. I see you make edits around this subject... I am wondering who (if anybody) now holds the city status for New Sarum/Salisbury. I've actually been meaning to e-mail Salisbury City Council. As far as I can see: 1.The charter Trustees of the City of New Sarum were the district councillors on Salisbury district council for the unparished area of the former municipal borough of New Sarum. 2.Salisbury District Council was abolished earlier this year. The existing charter trustees must, therefore, have been dissolved as there are no longer any district councillors. 3.The regulation establishing charter trustees in the reorganised authorities excludes Salisbury [1]. 4.A Salisbury parish council was formed for the unparished area. 5.The parish council adopted the style "Salisbury City Council" 6.The parish council have adopted the coat of arms of the municipal borough

What seems to be missing is 1.) any authority for the parish council to call itself a city. No notice of letters patent has appeared in the London Gazette, which is the norm. 2.) Likewise the transfer of the coat of arms would be published there if done by royal licence. If carried out under the Local Government Act 1972 it would have been published as a statutory instrument. No sign of that.

I notice you added civil parish/charter trustees to the List of cities in the United Kingdom. Perhaps you could clarify. It certainly used to be the case that no charter trustees can exist in an area comprised in a civil parish. It would be great if you could clear this up (it may that there is stuff that hasn't made it into the Gazette/OPSI yet). Otherwise it looks like Salisbury may be a "former city" with pretensions. Shame if it has gone the way of Rochester. :-(09:17, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Hello. I received an e-mail today from the Constitutional Settlement Division of the Ministry of Justice. Apparently notification of the letters patent granting city status to the parish of Salisbury will be published in the London Gazette this Friday. Lozleader (talk) 14:07, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Shard of glass.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Shard of glass.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --timsdad ^(talk) 06:22, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Londonbridgetower.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Londonbridgetower.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --timsdad ^(talk) 06:23, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Salisbury coa.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Salisbury coa.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:31, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

David Cameron[edit]

Hi!

I reverted your change to Mr Cameron's style; as far as I understand it "MP" is correct (he is a Member of Parliament) but "PM" isn't - he is Prime Minister, but this is an office, not a title. In the same way, we wouldn't use "Ambassador" - but would use "Sir" - for Nigel Sheinwald (the British ambassador to the United States).

Cheers, TFOWR^propaganda 14:37, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Scc crest only.png[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Scc crest only.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Image Screening Bot (talk) 21:54, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SalisburyCClogo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SalisburyCClogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:16, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SalisburyCClogo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SalisburyCClogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:40, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]