User talk:Longhair/Archive19

Reference tags

Hi. Thanks for all your hard work in tagging articles where additional or complete referencing is needed. I did want to direct your attention to guidelines for use in most reference needed templates that suggest that the usual practice is to place them at the top of the article unless the template is for a specific section concerned. It's easier to see, and gets more attention than when placed at the bottom. I happened to notice this when I was looking at articles for members of the Monkees. In any case, thanks! Wildhartlivie (talk) 09:05, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Perhaps, but there are differences between aesthetics, opinions and guidelines. Wildhartlivie (talk) 09:22, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Rudget!

Dear Longhair, my sincere thanks for your support in my second request for adminship, which ended with 113 supports, 11 opposes, and 4 neutral. I would especially like to thank my admin coach and nominator, Rlevse and Ryan Postlethwaite who in addition to Ioeth all inspired me to run for a second candidacy. I would also like to make a special mention to Phoenix-wiki, Dihyrdogen Monoxide and OhanaUnited who all offered to do co-nominations, but I unfortunately had to decline. I had all these funny ideas that it would fail again, and I was prepared for the worst, but at least it showed that the community really does have something other places don't. Who would have though Gmail would have been so effective? 32 emails in one week! (Even if it does classify some as junk :P) I'm glad that I've been appointed after a nail biting and some might call, decision changing RFA, but if you ever need anything, just get in touch. The very best of luck for 2008 and beyond, Rudget. 16:49, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Adelaide Wikimeetup 3

Adelaide Meetup Next: TBA Last: 6 March 2020

Hi Longhair - we're planning a third meetup in Adelaide sometime in the coming weeks, and would love to have you there. If you can, please help decide a location, a date and a time here. Thanks! ~ Riana ⁂ 14:00, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
You are receiving this message because you indicated interest at Meetup 2. If you do not live in Adelaide/South Australia and cannot make it to the meetup, please accept my apologies!

I realise it'd be a bit of a drive for you ;) ~ Riana ⁂ 14:00, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

My userpage

Hello Longhair. I copied the file from the main article Kyle Katarn and then I added it to my userpage. Am I allowed to do so? D@rk ^talk 21:28, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Hi there again. I only added the image of the main article from Kyle Katarn. Will it be accepted too? D@rk ^talk 13:12, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Hoodoo Gurus

How far away from a GA status do you think this article is? Dan arndt (talk) 04:56, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

King Tide

Could I get you or someone to rename this article to 'King Tide (album)' to avoid confusion with the article on King tide. Dan arndt (talk) 01:01, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Aust Barnstar

		The Australian Barnstar of National Merit
		for your efforts with Australian articles Gnangarra 00:07, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

My Rfa

I wish to thank you for being supportive of my effort to regain my adminship. Though it was not successful, your support was still very much appreciated. Let me know if there is anything I can do for you. Thank you!--MONGO 17:48, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

A favour

I wonder if you (or anyone else reading this) would mind looking at Template:WikiProject Cricket and providing some advice. There's two issues.

1. A project member has added a "Bottom-importance" to the code and created the respective categories. The rationale for this is good, but is it possible for the bot which updates the log and statistics tables to be changed to cope with this? If not, I'd guess we need to go back to top, high, mid and low.
2. Is a "List-Class" able to be added? And if so, would you mind.

Reply here if you like. —Moondyne 04:49, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Actually, after doing some more reading and thinking since the above post, I reckon that its not all that critical if the bottom parameter articles don't go into the bot processing. As long as they get categorised, and they are. —Moondyne 23:44, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

I appreciate your taking time out to clarify the issue on the category thing. I realise I might have confused some of the processes - thanks for separating it all out :) SatuSuro 15:27, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Linkspam

Hey Longhair, you reverted my anon edit of a link to Australia 2020 Summit. I added http://2020summit.org/ as external link to the same article while logged in and as they have a similar function, I wonder why you consider one is linkspam and another is not. cheers, pfctdayelise (talk) 06:53, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Hello,

As it is such a new thing it's not like there is a ton of established resources on the topic. I don't think either of them are "spam" as in inappropriate or indiscriminately-placed links.

I added them because it is a new topic that explicitly invites participation from all citizens. As the official site is static, people who come to Wikipedia are likely to be looking for ways to participate. Those links bother offer ways of participating.

Mostly I guess I am curious if the revert was "anon bias". cheers, pfctdayelise (talk) 06:16, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

No worries, thanks for your quick response to the user Melburnian (talk) 07:20, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Message, then

I recieved a message saying that my change of the article of Randle McMurphy was not constructive and that if I continued I would be banned. I added in that McMurphy tried to rape Nurse Ratched and tore off her clothes to show that she was not a machine but in fact very much human and as vulnerable as the rest of us. If you've read the book and disagree with my interpretation, i would be more than happy to discuss it, but as it is, this is the way that the book portrays this event, and i do not appreciate being told i will be banned if i continue in this fashion, which i can only take to mean that if i continue to make posts that are relevant and completely true, i will be banned. Please either take down your bot or script it so it is not as broad and does not message people who only trying to actually make Wikipedia a more correct and better place. Cheers man. --Eidlyn (talk) 06:46, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Alright, that would be great. It doesn't happen in the film because the film dumbed down a lot of the book, but in the end, he definitely rips off part of her clothes and I believe he does begin to rape her or its implied that he does. Also, how do you send messages using this thing? I'm sorry for the heated message, I was just a little peeved that you're automated message was threatening to ban me when, i think you'll agree, i really wasn't trying to just mess up the article, just adding more information. Cheers --Eidlyn (talk) 08:01, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Then I'm sorry for flying off like that. Pg 275,"performing a hard duty that finally just had to be done, like it or not" i believe implies attempted rape, especially since he just tore her uniform down the middle with her breasts hanging out and everything. By the way, yea i know you aren't a bot, I just thought you had a bot gunning for you.--Eidlyn (talk) 22:13, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Electronicfrontiersaustralialogo.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Electronicfrontiersaustralialogo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it may be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 13:50, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Flag Question

Hello Longhair, just wondering how you got the aussie flag to the top right hand side of your user and user talk page? Cheers Wiki ian 08:55, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Columns

Hello again Longhair, can you please refer me to a wiki help page that talks about columns? If you do not know of any could you point out a few wiki pages that uses them? kind regards, Wiki ian 10:15, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

You Idiot!

Hey Longhair, why did you delete my Dan Barr page?! I am very angry at you! Book it on home! Go! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alloutsports11 (talk • contribs) 22:27, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Well it takes all kinds

Yep I forgot the afl tag (again) oh well another day another tag :( SatuSuro 11:33, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Melpedia Link

Thanks for giving me an explanation on why you removed the page, but delisting it because it only has 5 users, is that a valid reason? It doesn't mention registered user base as one of the reasons for removing a wiki. I've put in maybe 200 hours into the wiki, including photographing many streets and locations in the Melbourne CBD. I'd like you to perhaps browse the site a bit more, in particular the the allpages link, you'll see that it is not a new wiki, nor is it that small. KiwiTallGuy (talk) 10:48, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Ok, my bad, I've reread the external links article and perhaps it isn't of a criteria to be added yet. Strange, though, I have other wikis listed in Wikipedia that are of a smaller size then this site and I haven't added the links myself, other Wikipedia editors have. I guess I'll wait for that to happen in this case as well. KiwiTallGuy (talk) 10:52, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

re. Giggy got funny mouth

This made me laugh (out loud btw). You're a funny guy. Regarding your last RfA, I said I'd support some time in the future. Just letting you know your efforts around here of late have "earned" my support, whatever that's worth these days :) Until you chose to run again... Cheers. -- Longhair\^talk 11:14, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Hehehe, thanks for that. It's always nice to be rewarded for enforcing core policy! I don't plan to run for RfA any time in the near future, mainly because I'm happy being a cynical promoter of moar swearing doing what I'm doing now (read; clogging up AWNB/A with my FxCs). But yeah, maybe one day in the future. btw. I noticed you haven't yet supported Riana's RfB. Maybe you should based on my commentary there ;) Cheers mate, dihydrogen monoxide (H₂0) 22:24, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

ANI thread

Can you come back to here if you have the time or interest please. I need to get some more views on what I think continues to be a complex case of conflict of interest by this editor - and whether this should just got to the Wikipedia Foundation now rather than us trying to deliberate it further. Thank you.--VS ^talk 10:34, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Crackerjack.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Crackerjack.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 19:55, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Image:Mallboyfilm.jpg

I have tagged Image:Mallboyfilm.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 19:56, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Image:DeathinBrunswick.jpg

I have tagged Image:DeathinBrunswick.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 19:56, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Bad boy bubby.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Bad boy bubby.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 19:24, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Mother Goose stuffed.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Mother Goose stuffed.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:18, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Pinball Links

Hey, Sorry I was unaware Wikipedia's restrictions on adding links to websites that you own. I personally feel that the information provided on the website is a worthwhile external link, and due to how often the information is updated hard to add to each Wikipedia entry. And due to the mass removal of the links yesterday after being on the encyclopedia for several months now without any discussion was malicious. Are you saying to re include each link it has to be discussed on the separate talk pages? Muddyboy (talk) 08:07, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

China Pacific Insurance

Please don't delete the title called "China Pacific Insurance". I am editing it now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ricky@36 (talk • contribs) 08:24, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Please be patient and wait for a while. I found the administrators are abnormally quick to delete articles in English version. This is NOT rubbish title and don't worry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ricky@36 (talk • contribs) 08:30, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Wow...

Thanks for the revert... they're mad at me! :) Jmlk17 09:11, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

No problems on the reverts, you guys seemed to have a fistful of trolls tonight. Glad I could help. Redrocket (talk) 09:35, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Rangeblock

I'm no good with them... but that loser needs to be rangeblocked for sure. Jmlk17 09:40, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Hm, perhaps I protected your userpage too early? If I knew you did a range block, I would have left it. Anyway, you can obviously unprotect your page whenever you want, cheers. Spellcast (talk) 09:48, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

No problem. Anything to stop a bot tagging it for deletion is always good! Spellcast (talk) 10:29, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

^_^ Extreme speed!

[1][2]

1 minute!

How did you pull that off? dihydrogen monoxide (H₂0) 11:22, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

...that's a scary thought. I think IRC has slowed my reflexes :( dihydrogen monoxide (H₂0) 11:24, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

I think User:Lankiveil/Not Dihydrogen Monoxide answers your question. Not mine, just a joke. Still...freakishly fast! Cheers, dihydrogen monoxide (H₂0) 11:28, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Right place, right time, that's where the speed came from. Nothing more. No bots, only fingers here. -- Longhair\^talk 11:32, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

looked like

It was going on too long, so classically the cat terror from the west struck :( - anytime btw SatuSuro 23:48, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Indigenous people of Australia

Thanks for updating the template Paul foord (talk) 09:17, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks!

Merci,Grazie,Thanks you, Gracias, Spassiba, Xie Xie,... Et caetera for the automatic welcome! Otourly (talk) 16:58, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Fuck (disambiguation)

Please stay off my talk page. It seems that I contested a page and now I am getting flooded. Maybe you should look into that. I have finished with the subject a while ago. However, I will take it to the next level tomorrow, as per wiki. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thright (talk • contribs) 01:59, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Good luck. -- Longhair\^talk 02:01, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

thank you. I know this is a heated topic, but I wish all users acted with repect. Thright (talk) 02:04, 11 March 2008 (UTC)thright

Please help, my talk page is still being rv. Can you ask all to stop. Thank youThright (talk) 02:09, 11 March 2008 (UTC)thright

thanks for you reply. I can't believe this, it over two tags on a page entitled "FUCK"! WOW Thright (talk) 02:20, 11 March 2008 (UTC)thright

Help me clean the page up! "I don't think (s)he'll listen to me or any other admin, given how handily (s)he disregarded it and started playing the "Jack Thompson" card... :( -Jéské (v^_^v :L5 Tediz Strong) 02:41, 11 March 2008 (UTC)" is a personal attack. That should go and all ill mention comments about me. Second, I am not happy with how Jeske handled herself, is there anything I can do? A sorry from her will be all that I ask. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thright (talk • contribs)

Im sorry, I require some more help. I have let it go! and thus I hope others will too, however this line was added, "I have dropped it, and and such. Another use came along and added another line. Then you close with "I actually gave notice to Thright's talk page in regards to that actually. It's becoming tiresome to have to deal with the nagging that goes along with it, at various user talk pages and here. It's a dead issue. And with that... seicer | talk | contribs 04:06," I have replied on seicer's talk page. All I want is for the line to be deleted. I feel that he is trying to start a fight. As for me, this issue is over. Thanks for your help Thright (talk) 04:18, 11 March 2008 (UTC)thright

Thright

I really don't think I'm hounding for answers about anything, and I posted in response to a question I was asked. Had Thright not initiated a conversation with me, I would not have continued discussing anything with him. This was deleted as "being flooded". I find this somewhat rude, and I guess I felt it important to point that out. I'm going offline anyway, so I never had the intention of continuing the discussion, but I don't especially care to be asked something and then metaphorically slapped in the face when I answer. Natalie (talk) 04:42, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Good to see my pages are well protected while I'm otherwise engaged --Closedmouth (talk) 06:59, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

You Suck

Tell me not be put crap on a page!! my information was truthful and well noted in the city of orange! and maybe you should take a peek at tha page and then decied what is crap and what isnt —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.218.187.38 (talk) 09:17, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Schapelle Corby

She appears after Si Yi Chen, and then again after Renae Lawrence. -- JackofOz (talk) 09:36, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Agree

Very much so - needs big work similar at that one yet undone - thanks for replying on this - will try some work on it - the sources arent as comprehensive as for the later one - cheers and thanks and best of luck with email stuff - funny I have had a disabled account unchecked from 4 months ago i have been meaning to get done :( SatuSuro 11:13, 12 March 2008 (UTC) Frank Zappa - voice - mock serious I can relate to that! SatuSuro 11:17, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Re: Your non-admin username

I've responded on my talk page. Tra (Talk) 10:47, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Talk page vandalism

Thanks for reverting that vandalism on my talk page! Much appreciated. Do you accept barnstars? - DiligentTerrier ^{and friends} 23:55, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

OK, here you go: - DiligentTerrier ^{and friends} 00:03, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

		The Diligent Terrier Barnstar of Diligence
		For reverting vandalism on my talk page, Longhair is awarded the Diligent Terrier barnstar of diligence. Congratulations! - DiligentTerrier and friends 00:00, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Minor Barnstar
		For doing all those "Longhair jobs" that nobody else can be bothered doing! :) dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 08:25, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Cometstyles has smiled at you and showered you with WikiLove and hopefully this has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:User:Cometstyles/smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

P.S.. it has been nearly 4 years now, please get a hair-cut :DD ...--Cometstyles 08:39, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Or else rename to User:RidiculousHippyHair. I'd come to the next Melbourne meetup for that! dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 08:22, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

A wise man once said, "Believe half of what you read, and nothing of what you hear" :). I had the chop back in the days when Windows 3.1x was king. The nickname has stuck. Some mates never let you forget :) -- Longhair\^talk 18:34, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Problems is when some of us had hair (sic) many wikipedia eds (1) were in nappies in that era (2) not even considered for the lottery of life (3) whereas some of us were working hard for 200 a week :) SatuSuro 23:30, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

		The Barnstar of Peace
		For showing the skills of excellent mediator. You did not show bias and helped both sides. Thank you |so much. Thright (talk) 05:11, 11 March 2008 (UTC) |} furthermore Tireless Contributor Barnstar Award Sats, one of the nuisance (unwise) eds (and bald to boot) of the Indonesian Project is in awe of your |capacity to cope with the onsloughts of pestilence plague and damnation on your talk page - from those with little capacity to understand anything - bit like the |late douglas adams's vogon chiefs perspicacity and understanding of literary criticism and the use of irony - may you rest easy that your resistance to the madness |is indeed not useless :) SatuSuro 13:39, 19 March 2008 (UTC) Thanks For reverting the blanking of my talk page. --NeilN talk ♦ contribs 11:14, 19 March 2008 (UTC) And mine, as well. --Orange Mike | Talk 12:54, 19 March 2008 (UTC) re: Yuckfoo Thanks for the heads up, I'll take that off her talkpage. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 20:37, 22 March 2008 (UTC) Ah, I see. Then in that case, I'll leave the comment and maybe she'll respond to me. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 20:39, 22 March 2008 (UTC) Bond see Harry Potter fandom‎ Ultra! 08:06, 23 March 2008 (UTC) Decompression sickness As the number of references have increased from 1 to 18, I hope you don't mind but I've removed the refimprove tag you placed on Decompression sickness in January. Please feel free to revert if you believe additional citations are still needed, but it would obviously more helpful if you could flag where you think such citations may be needed with a fact tag. --RexxS (talk) 21:15, 25 March 2008 (UTC) Do we get prizes? For alerting others to the items that seem to break more rules than we actually have? (someone else alerted me anyways) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Government_schools_in_New_South_Wales has been noticed and is being discussed at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Australian_Wikipedians%27_notice_board - cheers SatuSuro 00:59, 29 March 2008 (UTC) That in itself which you state - it could be a project unto itself :( SatuSuro 01:13, 29 March 2008 (UTC) Orphaned non-free media (Image:Robert-Trimbole-mugshot.jpg) Thanks for uploading Image:Robert-Trimbole-mugshot.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:15, 29 March 2008 (UTC) Priscilla Ahn I prodded Priscilla Ahn and the prod was just removed by the creator. It seems to have been expanded more before the creator removed it, so is it possibly notable now? Or should it be AFD'd? -WarthogDemon 04:15, 30 March 2008 (UTC) Fair use rationale for Image:BendigoAdvertiser.jpg Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:BendigoAdvertiser.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 07:23, 30 March 2008 (UTC) SKA-B-Q You added a notability tag on the article, but did not speedied it. Why? Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 08:57, 31 March 2008 (UTC) Cap'n'cupcake can you help me? I trying to get something ready for a wikia, but it dosen't have all the things I need like wikipedia, get back to me sonn please. --Cap'n'cupcake (talk) 02:22, 2 April 2008 (UTC) we'll I'm having problems redirecting one thing to my User profile. --Cap'n'cupcake (talk) 02:28, 2 April 2008 (UTC) I was just tring that out. I was one of the players, ("Cap'n'cupcake") and on the wikia I want to link it to my User page. --Cap'n'cupcake (talk) 02:32, 2 April 2008 (UTC) I won't do it again, I tried Sandbox but I think it didn't work. This is what I'm having trouble with. --Cap'n'cupcake (talk) 02:36, 2 April 2008 (UTC) Did I metion it was not for wikipedia? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cap'n'cupcake (talk • contribs) 02:42, 2 April 2008 (UTC) Criticism of Jimbo Wales The Register has recently been critical that some people do not have enough criticism in their article and surely we should set a good example by ensuring all criticism of Jimbo, not matter how trivial is documented. The tiny amount in Jimbo's article is a whitewash. Trying to censor or delete such an article will be a PR disaster for Wikipedia.Momento (talk) 09:26, 2 April 2008 (UTC) another vandalism Hi! :) I have just sighted another vandalism by User_talk:165.228.191.241. I believe you are an admin, and so you may want to block this user. Thanks. Marax (talk) 04:13, 3 April 2008 (UTC) Miss me? You're awesome! Probably the best editor yet! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.90.217.145 (talk) 16:29, 5 April 2008 (UTC) Sorry About That My apologies for the a.k.a Jersey article. I hit a couple of wrong buttons, didn't mean to leave things blank like that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by B.T. Havoc (talk • contribs) 04:57, 8 April 2008 (UTC) err.. okay I just thought Magfeed.com was as note worthy as any of the other web based aggregators. *cough* Planet aggregator It's wiki based if that gives it any extra cred. No bfd. Try it out. If you like it, consider a reinstatement. Word, --Bowl of vindaloo (talk) 22:00, 9 April 2008 (UTC) Replaceable fair use Image:Martin Bryant.jpg Replaceable fair use Thanks for uploading Image:Martin Bryant.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please: Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all. Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself. If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Lawrence § t/e 19:30, 11 April 2008 (UTC) Orphaned non-free media (Image:TenApplesUpOnTop cover.jpg) Thanks for uploading Image:TenApplesUpOnTop cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:05, 27 April 2008 (UTC) Speedy deletion of Newcomb, Victoria A tag has been placed on Newcomb, Victoria, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Beeblbrox (talk) 21:55, 27 April 2008 (UTC) Corey Worthington Corey Worthington he isn't going to be an intruder. Also vandalism From Jonnymore2008 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonnymore2008 (talk • contribs) I am trying to be Good Faith on this website because. which really i am. it my first go trying to delete information Corey Worthington . SO Give me A break dont undo Corey Worthington information please From Jonnymore2008 IM AM NOT TRYING TO vandalize on the 2008 Big Brother Website please leave me alone please. I am trying to fix up information. IM AM BEING GOOD FAITH WITH YOU> SO DONT UNDO PLEASE From Jonnymore2008 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonnymore2008 (talk • contribs) 00:17, 28 April 2008 (UTC) April 2008 You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Big Brother Australia 2008. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 23:52, 27 April 2008 (UTC) RE: 3RR on Big Brother Australia 2008 I left a warning on both talk pages. After looking I noticed that you were reverting vandalism but you both appear to be in an edit war. That is why I left the message. ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 23:58, 27 April 2008 (UTC) Speedy deletion of Image:Camerons Corner 3 borders.jpg A tag has been placed on Image:Camerons Corner 3 borders.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [3], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then: state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions. add the relevant copyright tag. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Camerons Corner 3 borders.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Polly (Parrot) 02:58, 28 April 2008 (UTC) Speedy deletion of Image:Dingo fence Camerons Corner.jpg A tag has been placed on Image:Dingo fence Camerons Corner.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [4], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then: state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions. add the relevant copyright tag. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Dingo fence Camerons Corner.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Polly (Parrot) 04:07, 28 April 2008 (UTC) AWB Hi, I noticed that your bot hasn't used AWB for a considerable amount of time. If you still have plans to use it, please let us know so that we could remove unneeded bots from the check page. Cheers, MaxSem(Han shot first!) 18:20, 28 April 2008 (UTC) New Project Myself and several other editors have been compiling a list of very active editors who would likely be available to help new editors in the event they have questions or concerns. As the list grew and the table became more detailed, it was determined that the best way to complete the table was to ask each potential candidate to fill in their own information, if they so desire. This list is sorted geographically in order to provide a better estimate as to whether the listed editor is likely to be active. If you consider yourself a very active Wikipedian who is willing to help newcomers, please either complete your information in the table or add your entry. If you do not want to be on the list, either remove your name or just disregard this message and your entry will be removed within 48 hours. The table can be found at User:Useight/Highly Active, as it has yet to have been moved into the Wikipedia namespace. Thank you for your help. Useight (talk) 07:04, 3 May 2008 (UTC) Oh boy Count me out (previous message) looks like trying to grab time - as if there was any - I do hope having your talk page satusuro free has calmed things down a bit :) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Friedrich - I have just looked at this after seeing your tagging our great western australian hero l c - and am astonished the art can have gone so long with a personal talk message and a possible copyvio on the art mainspace for so long (a year and all those eds?)- is there a reason for that? I gotta get off (said that an hour ago to myself) I would have thought the quote is potentialy copyvio and POV whatsmore - but a talk item in mainspace for that long - the oggle minds, oops mind boggles SatuSuro 03:29, 5 May 2008 (UTC) no urgency - get better! SatuSuro 03:33, 5 May 2008 (UTC) Thanks for that - Its just that some arts i check at 8- 9 am perth time have been open vndlsm since 3 or 4 am and have got through - but that takes the cake - a year... oh well - cheers SatuSuro 09:40, 5 May 2008 (UTC) thanks for this cleanup here, I'm never quite sure when people are attached to their previous stubs TravellingCarithe Busy Bee 04:02, 6 May 2008 (UTC) I'm reporting you... You had absolutely no right to delete my user page. "Blatant Advertising" indeed: what the hell was I advertising? I'm taking this to WP:ANI as I am extremely angry with my treatment here so far. Missing 4 Year Old (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 09:27, 7 May 2008 (UTC) Hahaha...you get accused of the weirdest things! dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 09:45, 7 May 2008 (UTC) Kidnapper now hey... and I haven't even left the country since 2003? -- Longhair\talk 09:50, 7 May 2008 (UTC) Yes, minor...and you don't need to leave the country when the country comes to you...*confused face* dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 09:51, 7 May 2008 (UTC) Hmm, if publishing this book can get me through yr. 12, I'm all for it! dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 09:53, 7 May 2008 (UTC) *cheesy grin* dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 09:55, 7 May 2008 (UTC) LOL. Is it still April Fool's Day? Well, at least you were not accused of being a sockpuppet. Bearian (talk) 13:25, 7 May 2008 (UTC) DMR Have you heard of DMR? From what I know they built/designed bridges (such as Image:Marshalls Creek Bridge.jpg). I've found little about them which doesn't surprise me (most likely one of those companies that fold or get bought out) and would you know any road experts or know a bit about the history of the road network in NSW? Bidgee (talk) 11:29, 8 May 2008 (UTC) Bugger! :( I'll try the Council (They have to have some sort of history) and the RTA (I'm yet to get a reply on a few other matters). Bidgee (talk) 11:33, 8 May 2008 (UTC) As per message on Bidgee's page I was inspired to create Department of Main Roads (New South Wales) :-) Regards Matilda talk 00:50, 9 May 2008 (UTC) Oh highly esteemed reported one Category:Australian mobsters - I have just tagged with the ole WP OZ etc - and noticed that it had been previously deleted - realising your mixing with the high fallutin parts of oz society in yr editing - wondered whether the resurrection of this cat is kosher or not? Just asking - no big deal either way SatuSuro 01:18, 8 May 2008 (UTC) Yeah glad you agree - I am off more than on today maybe you might like to do the honours? An oz cfd? SatuSuro 01:27, 8 May 2008 (UTC) Gawks - dont let me start - there im trying to get off and you use that word! focus, focus - indeed my mental wikipedia to do list is always 10 times larger than time and reality ever allow me - have a good day - i better get off now - cheers SatuSuro 01:31, 8 May 2008 (UTC) So it looks like you really have cleaned up the mobsters - once and for all with template as well ! well done! SatuSuro 11:19, 8 May 2008 (UTC) Just about to get off but in these delightful climes that we are doing things with - some smartie (i hope it wasnt me) i think had added law project to one of the wider cats like crims of oz - i would have thought that just crime=yes is enough for these happy chappy categories - watcha think? (im off for maybe a few days now) - cheers SatuSuro 06:40, 10 May 2008 (UTC) Thanks Thank you for your welcome! I do intend to stay on Wikipedia, however i do not wish to saty in England. Will this affect my Wikipedia account and internet connection??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Irishman66 (talk • contribs) 09:37, 10 May 2008 (UTC) 24.61.133.186 You may want to follow up from that ex-article. I'll leave a note on the creators talkpage. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 13:53, 10 May 2008 (UTC) Hmm? Seems a bit harsh. Wonder if you guys have your finger on the pulse of all newcomers that try to take in all the rules and recs. Won't bother again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Loxford (talk • contribs) 14:16, 10 May 2008 (UTC) Loxford (talk) 14:25, 10 May 2008 (UTC) Deletion review for Qualia (hotel) An editor has asked for a deletion review of Qualia (hotel). Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 03:26, 11 May 2008 (UTC) Move of Robert Dziekański Taser incident This comment is in reference to your move to Robert Dziekański taser incident. I disagree that "Taser" should be uncapitalized, as a Taser, not a electroshock weapon made by a different manufacturer, was used. I wrote a style discussion at Talk:Taser#Capitalization of noun; feel free to comment on anything that I missed. Thanks. Flatscan (talk) 19:04, 10 May 2008 (UTC) Thanks for your quick reply. Flatscan (talk) 17:24, 11 May 2008 (UTC) Carmel Charles Do you think this article is stub? Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 02:40, 12 May 2008 (UTC) Hi How do i report someone —Preceding unsigned comment added by Irishman66 (talk • contribs) 16:16, 12 May 2008 (UTC) WP:HAU/OC Hello . The Highly Active Users project has gone through a complete revamping per popular demand. We believe this new format will make it easier for new editors to find assistance. However, with the new format, I must again ask you to verify your information on this page. With the extensive changes, I may have made some errors. Thanks again. bibliomaniac15 02:05, 17 May 2008 (UTC) You will also need to add [[Category:Wikipedians who use StatusBot]] to your userpage in order for SoxBot V to automatically update your online/offline status. If you do not added this text, you will always be listed as "offline" at HAU. Thanks. Useight (talk) 02:57, 17 May 2008 (UTC) Highways Rom rulz424 (talk · contribs · count · logs · page moves · block log) keeps adding Stuart Highway twice in List of highways in Northern Territory and keeps on reverting in Goldfields Highway. Could you review the edits made if possible? Bidgee (talk) 15:41, 18 May 2008 (UTC) Thanks! Thanks for reverting vandalism on my user page. --Aleenf1 09:12, 19 May 2008 (UTC) Maharajbagh zoo I just now created this article and in less than a minute it was tagged by you as missing citation. As you could see I had already added citation to the page but only forgot to mention reflist below so they were not visible. Before I could add it the tag came on. I would suggest you wait for people to correct it for themselves first. Wait for atleast 5 mins before tagging. --gppande «talk» 09:21, 19 May 2008 (UTC) Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Anitacobby.jpg} Thank you for uploading Image:Anitacobby.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check: That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in. That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale. If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 04:33, 21 May 2008 (UTC) Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Anitacobbypagaentwin.jpg} Thank you for uploading Image:Anitacobbypagaentwin.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check: That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in. That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale. If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 04:33, 21 May 2008 (UTC) Fair use rationale for Image:Australian story.jpg Thanks for uploading Image:Australian story.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 12:33, 21 May 2008 (UTC) Disputed fair use rationale for Image:BRAZEL.jpg} Thank you for uploading Image:BRAZEL.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check: That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in. That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale. If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 16:47, 21 May 2008 (UTC) Disputed fair use rationale for Image:BarryLane.jpg} Thank you for uploading Image:BarryLane.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check: That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in. That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale. If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 21:38, 21 May 2008 (UTC) Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Beckett2.jpg} Thank you for uploading Image:Beckett2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check: That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in. That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale. If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 00:27, 22 May 2008 (UTC) Demographics WikiProject Nothing amiss - my edit preceded your fix of the template! I should have known. Many thanks for your help! Regards --Matilda talk 00:21, 23 May 2008 (UTC) Hello mr longhair nice person - I have a horrible suspicion the template at Demographics wants NA and not cat - I had just tagged cat pages with cat and they seemed to be gathering in a group at what looks like the wrong location (to me - its a few months since i did my last dash at this in the oz project domain) - sincerest apols if i got it wrong - you might want to let me know whether the coding prefers NA or not - i might be off for a bit today - again - apols if it is wrong SatuSuro 01:23, 23 May 2008 (UTC) OK if it looks ok at your end - thats ok - i think it is the long term pavlovian category tagging response to expect the Indonesian project tagging with the class = NA that when I see category talk pages turn up anywhere else than 'non-art category pages' after my brilliant oops of the other year with cat tagging ... thanks for that SatuSuro 06:28, 23 May 2008 (UTC) AIV Thanks Prom3th3an (talk) 07:28, 25 May 2008 (UTC) WP:HAU Sorry to bother you about this again, but you have yet to update your information at Highly Active Users. If you do not update your entry, it will be removed within 48 hours. Thanks. Useight (talk) 16:08, 25 May 2008 (UTC) Disputed fair use rationale for Image:MalePregnancy poster.jpg Thank you for uploading Image:MalePregnancy poster.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale. If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by an adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr 16:27, 25 May 2008 (UTC) If youre up to it My reversion at outback probably needs some oversight from someone else - there was a ridiculous fight there this arvo i think and for what ever reason I think my reverting back of it seems to resolve things- however its always good to get a rap on the knuckles from those whom id respect the decision than get involved with the warring parties - if i get it wrong - cheers SatuSuro 09:56, 2 June 2008 (UTC) issue been and gone - sorry to have bothered SatuSuro 09:09, 4 June 2008 (UTC) Keep it up my fellow Australian Wikipedian Longhair, i just want to say keep up your terrific work here on Wikipedian and hopefully you can keep it going for a long time to come. Its always a pleasure and an honour to get in touch with someone who has been helping the project for such a long time and it being a fellow Australian i just had to pop by and give my praises to you because you deserve it. You always see users come and go and sometimes they leave because of the project but then i come across great users like you and i always say to myself its worth it, to help out the project and to do it so we can all enjoy the place, interacting with users across the world makes it worthwhile. I heard a nice quote from someone the other day "to accomplish great things, we must not only act, but also dream; not only plan but also believe." I dont know if your still into barnstars after all this time but heres one to show my appreciation: Take Care and all the best The Original Barnstar To Longhair, a fellow Australian wikipedian for the great work in regard to the project after all these years and i hopefully it can be continued for a long time to come. Thanks, take it easy Roadrunnerz45 (talk 2 me) 11:48, 2 June 2008 (UTC) WP:HAU Hello yet again. I regretfully inform you that the bot we were using to update the user status at Wikipedia:Highly Active Users, SoxBot V, was blocked for its constant updating. With this bot out of operation, a patch is in the works. Until that patch is reviewed and accepted by the developers, some options have been presented to use as workarounds: 1) Qui monobook (not available in Internet Explorer); 2) User:Hersfold/StatusTemplate; 3) Manually updating User:StatusBot/Status/USERNAME; or 4) Not worry about it and wait for the patch to go through, which hopefully won't take long. If you have another method, you can use that, too. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Useight (talk) 22:31, 3 June 2008 (UTC) Hi Long time no speak, thanks for the tags at North America Challenge, I'm cleaning up the article Laser Quest, will fix what I can. Gnangarra 09:46, 4 June 2008 (UTC) Thanks... for reverting vandalism in my talk-page Vipinhari (talk) 10:10, 4 June 2008 (UTC) WikiThanks Thank You! 1993 Indonesian Grand Prix An Australian category, almost all Australian competitors, all Australian teams, just asking how is the Australian Motorsport wikiproject not appropriate? --Falcadore (talk) 23:05, 4 June 2008 (UTC) John Wormell Please don't welcome the feral sockpuppet. Timeshift (talk) 10:46, 5 June 2008 (UTC) Date? Hi, can you understand what is the date of this article? Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 04:32, 6 June 2008 (UTC) Ugh If you go to far into the Indonesian Project you will be doing that for every second or third article - are you sure you wish to be that enthusiastic? (just saw Kompas) - please understand that WP Indonesian EN is struggling with reduced active english speaking editors - and there are some major issues regarding linking from totally unreferenced material - I would ask for an on or off wiki conference on some of the issues if you are going to go into the project - seriously - cheers SatuSuro 06:15, 6 June 2008 (UTC) Brave man - well if you ever do - give me an off wiki message and I'll give you the low down - its a horrible story :( SatuSuro 06:21, 6 June 2008 (UTC) Pitch Vision I know this is a strange thing to compliment someone on, but that was the tightest, cleanest, most convincing PROD template I've ever seen. - Vianello (talk) 06:56, 6 June 2008 (UTC) It scares me how many doohickeys Wikipedia has that I never noticed before. Half of me feels stupid for missing it, the other half is more concerned with what ELSE I might not have noticed! But anyway, thanks! That will be very useful. - Vianello (talk) 07:01, 6 June 2008 (UTC) Hey Hey Longhair, long time no talk. :) I hope all is well with you. I just wanted to let you know that Nathan has appealed his ban and I thought as one of the admins who dealt with him last time you might have some thoughts on whether he should be unbanned. Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#User:Punk_Boi_8. Take care, Sarah 02:34, 7 June 2008 (UTC) Yes. Thank God, indeed. :) He emailed me and asked me to withdraw his request and I meant to come back and let you know that it was over but I got distracted irl. They've been over-turning lots of bans on AN lately and I was quite concerned we were going to be back at square one but it was rather anti-climactic in the end! Cheers, Sarah 04:34, 7 June 2008 (UTC) Your thoughts Hi Longhair. Sorry to bother you but just need your thoughts. I changed a title of a citation and Rob.au changed it back (minus the caps) but his edit summary stated this (You can't rename a citation!)[5]. I have left him a reply to see what his hinting at (and I'm hoping it's not my thoughts of a WP:OWN issue but am assuming good faith) Bidgee (talk) 18:32, 7 June 2008 (UTC) Thanks for the reply. So what I've been told is wrong. If a source has a long title use a shorter title which is what I was told a 2 editors in the past. Bidgee (talk) 18:53, 7 June 2008 (UTC) Coordinates? You appear to be requesting coordinates for my Naval Hospital Yokosuka Japan article. I don't see how it would fit in this article. The hospital is in yokosuka, and that city is linked in the article. Since the city has coordinates in its article, and this location is part of that city, don't you think that it would be rather redundant to add the same coords to a building in a city? Jimmyjones22 (talk) 02:10, 9 June 2008 (UTC) Newest Cabal Having investigated this situation more fully it seems that the three of you Mattinbgn, Longhair and Matilda belong to your own cabal now - all apparently having been informed by your grandmother (or similar) to mind your own business in this way. Unfortunately, as I have never been told to mind my own business by anyone (let alone my grandparents) I am unable to join up (*said with fingers crossed behind my back*). However I wish you all well. :) --VS talk 01:38, 13 June 2008 (UTC) Ghaghara References have added with a lot of dditional text material duly refrenced. Pl remove the tag.--Nvvchar (talk) 01:44, 13 June 2008 (UTC) Thank you very for proper referencing. I still don't have a hang of the procedure for automatic refrencing.--Nvvchar (talk) 02:38, 13 June 2008 (UTC) Fair use rationale for Image:RSLbadge-logo.gif Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:RSLbadge-logo.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ejay (talk) 13:32, 14 June 2008 (UTC) Sorry Im sorry for my actions. Please don't block me. Pattav2 (talk) 11:27, 15 June 2008 (UTC) Russell Latapy Hi, Just a heads up, I noticed your revert here: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Russell_Latapy&diff=211454551&oldid=211454471 I actually corrected that three days later, and changed it back to ply. Ply is a word, and "Play his trade" doesn't really make sense here. User:Aaarrrggghhh's contribution here was perfectly valid, but you warned him, asking him not to test on the article. I changed it back to ply. ← κεηηε∂γ (talk) 08:23, 16 June 2008 (UTC) Victorian geo stubs Hi, just a reminder - the Australian state is linked at Victoria (Australia), not at Victoria (which is a disambiguation page). DuncanHill (talk) 10:20, 20 June 2008 (UTC) Thank You Thank You for the speedy revert on my talk page :D --Chris 09:52, 22 June 2008 (UTC) Problem with Anon Anon with an IP range of 58.179.179.xxx keeps adding a link which point to an home server (shortlinks,gotdns.com points to redirect.gotdns.com which resolved to 58.179.195.193) which also points to once of the Anon's IP (Not working now since the Anon changed IP)[6]. The link is/was pointless as it was just an image. Bidgee (talk) 11:05, 23 June 2008 (UTC) The link will stop being added —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.179.179.33 (talk • contribs) Longhair you've got mail. :) Bidgee (talk) 12:43, 23 June 2008 (UTC) I thought There was a slow conversion to class=cat for oz project ( i keep meeting my tgs from last year) and you are only adding projects - does that mean we have clas=NA and its not getting changed for some reason? SatuSuro 08:46, 25 June 2008 (UTC) Hangon i think my over-editing has got to me - i think i saw it at a lst and not a category - my bad - embarrased :( - maybe i need to start tagging categories again :( SatuSuro 09:14, 25 June 2008 (UTC) My prob not yours - sorry - probably listening to an audio book about supernatural events on the road between you and the 'hill that has put the perspective out a bit :( SatuSuro 00:02, 26 June 2008 (UTC) Brian Burke Thanks for nailing that infobox. That was on my to-do list for today - I just noticed it a couple of days ago and I thought he had a clean sheet after the appeals. I was going to ask about it on the notice board. Retarius | Talk 05:42, 27 June 2008 (UTC) Coincidental IP My IP address suddenly received a message warning me about adding nonsene links to Talk:Robert Ballard page. This may be the result of another coincidental IP or a misunderstanding, as i have never visit the above page. The main cause of those activities may also be from another person who use the same PC (hence, same IP). My sincere apology, and i will try to solve the problem with that person. Otherwise, you have my words that i intend in no way to cause vandalism. This IP may change in the future, as it is a dynamic IP address and i can't do anything about it. Sincerely. 58.187.222.136 (talk) 04:44, 1 July 2008 (UTC) Blocked user name (cuntinintalicuinnuti) Hello friend - For some reason my user ID was just blocked. It is in Sicilian "cuntinintali" (continentalists) and "cuinnuti" (wrong-doers). It is a political statement against the illegal annexation, colonisation, and occupation of Sicily by Italy and government of the Italian mainland/continent. I'm not sure why you blocked my name. Is this not a violation of free-speech? In any event, I created a new user ID. But please tell me why you blocked my name. Thank you for your assistance. Best regards! --Nocontinental (talk) 21:40, 30 June 2008 (UTC) I deeply apologize if the name was thought to be offensive. That was not my intentions, I never thought of such an English meaning. Yes, I am content with my new name and I hope it now avoids confusion with the previous name. I do have a question if you can assist me. There are articles regarding Italy, and some people of the English Wikipedia insist on creating their own rules and ideas. Is there a way we can encourage or force the English Wikipedia to follow the Italian Wikipedia? There is no sense in English speakers coming up with their own ideas. Italy is officially classified in certain groups of regions by the Italian National Institute of Statistics (ISTAT). However, certain people (I think Italian-Americans with a certain bias or antiquated mentality) seem to want to group Italian regions according to their own parochial beliefs of what their Italian immigrant grandparents thought 50 years ago and passed down the generations. This to me is wrong, and does not make any sense. You can see for yourself Southern Italy, all you must do is click in the left-hand column to the version in "italiano" Mezzogiorno and you can see how the English version is all wrong. Even if you do not understand Italian, you can see by looking at the MAPS. Sicily and Sardinia are not southern Italy, they're Insular (Islander) Italy. What to do? Should I change the English article to make it right? Do we make a vote? The individuals writing the English Wikipedia articles about Italy are very thick-headed and do not like to agree. They have an ancient Roman Empire/Fascist Italian imperialistic bias. They're out of touch with history and reality (re: current Italian Wikipedia articles, current Italian regional classifications). Can you help me or guide me of what to do? Thank you for your assistance in anticipation. --Nocontinental (talk) 22:06, 30 June 2008 (UTC) Thank you for your reply. It is not much an issue of one Wikipedia's rule over another Wikipedia's rule. It's more like correcting fact from fiction. Could you imagine if the Italian Wikipedia said Hollywood was in New York and not California? Clearly this would be wrong because Hollywood is a city in California, which is a state in the US. No matter the language or the Wikipedia, this is the fact, because that is the hierarchy and classification of government. Similarly, Siciliy and Sardinia are part of the Island Region in both Italy's ISTAT and Europe's Parliament. This is a fact, even though the English Wikipedia wants to shuffle the classifications to suit some strange idea that they learned by watching too many Mafia movies! Once more, I thank you for your assistance and your kind words. I will see what comes of my discussion page, and move to the next step as you had suggested. Cheers, friend! -Saluti- --Nocontinental (talk) 22:24, 30 June 2008 (UTC) Category:Australian statutory rapists Hi Longhair. I would appreciate your opinion on this category and its members. I would suggest all should be deleted. -- Mattinbgn\talk 23:08, 30 June 2008 (UTC) Somewhat agree. Looking into the mess now :) -- Longhair\talk 23:09, 30 June 2008 (UTC) A very quick response, thanks! -- Mattinbgn\talk 23:31, 30 June 2008 (UTC) V good To hear from you - will check out things - if i am not when you are on later - just leave a message - cheers SatuSuro 23:42, 4 July 2008 (UTC) From the time stamp of this one about 2 hours yet before i can get into it - just to make sure could you direct me to an example - so that i dont misunderstand - ta SatuSuro 03:16, 5 July 2008 (UTC) Started the ball slowly rolling now SatuSuro 05:22, 5 July 2008 (UTC) Oh hell i kew i was tired - i think i have just gone and created Cat Clas OZ Acaps articles - it should have been lower case - im off for a while before i come back and fix that :( embarrassed SatuSuro 05:51, 5 July 2008 (UTC) Sorry delayed by real life issues - think i realise i did almost all of it wrong (NA) arts needed NA - and cat needed cat, and the articles with a lower case SatuSuro 12:18, 7 July 2008 (UTC) school holidays my end :( SatuSuro 00:31, 8 July 2008 (UTC) teenagers aside should tag some tonight my time SatuSuro 05:35, 8 July 2008 (UTC) heheh - tim and debbie (sic) way back used to have a segment headspace - doing tagging these days obviously requires a particular state of mind - and neither the computer, real life, or dogs (forget the teenagers) have made allowances for the fact that i would like a few hours to clean it all up - :| arrgh cant wait till they are back to school - teenagers that is - (forget the dogs) SatuSuro 09:04, 9 July 2008 (UTC) heeheeh saanen goats that we had to look after never kidded while we were minding em - it was getting them in off the further paddock in the swamp like area that used to leave me slightly puffed :( SatuSuro 09:08, 9 July 2008 (UTC) I shoulda done that when we were wandering last december january - going over we stopped at kimba, broken hill and dubbo, coming back it was a weird route of return - canberra, arrarat and victor harbour. who knows now if the fuel prices come as good as they might it might have to be horse and cart SatuSuro 09:14, 9 July 2008 (UTC) Email sent. Email has been sent. :) Bidgee (talk) 10:06, 8 July 2008 (UTC) WP:HAU, Status, and you! As you may know, the StatusBot responsible for maintaining the status of the Highly Active Users was taken offline. We now have a replacement in the Qui status system. This semi-automatic system will allow you to easily update your status page found at Special:Mypage/Status which the HAU page code is now designed to read from. If you are already using Qui (or a compatible system) - great! - no action is needed (other than remembering to update your status as necessary). If not, consider installing Qui. You can also manually update this status by changing the page text to online, offline, or busy. While it is not mandatory, the nature of HAU is that people are often seeking a quick answer from someone who is online and keeping our statuses up-to-date will assist with this. Note if you were previously using your /Status page as something other than a one-word status indicator, your HAU entry may have been set to "status=n" to correct display issues. Please clear this parameter if you change things to be "HAU compatible". Further questions can be raised at WT:HAU. This message was delivered by xenobot 23:14, 8 July 2008 (UTC) Oh hell In between everything - did the cats that needed to get fixed get fixed (apologies head like my edits at the mo) ? SatuSuro 06:16, 18 July 2008 (UTC) sorry about tht had intended to help but the mutiple threads school holidays and teenagers and the weather over here seem to leave everything chaotic i think i need a quiet time in wikisource or commons for a break :) SatuSuro 06:20, 18 July 2008 (UTC) There has been much hard working business for state importance tagging here at wa project - i have the feeling that the tassie and maritime and maybe some of the others need doing - any thoughts on sub project assessment at all? SatuSuro 06:24, 18 July 2008 (UTC) yeah it can be disoncerting when other prjects are dead as doornails :( SatuSuro 06:35, 18 July 2008 (UTC) arrgh give me a red discussion tag and i deliver :) SatuSuro 03:13, 19 July 2008 (UTC) geeze the milhist guys are bit slack if you notice my tagging last night SatuSuro 03:15, 19 July 2008 (UTC) I mightnt be an admin (yet) but i do have something that show up on my watchlist that indicates moves,changes and thingos and i forgot which button does it - and sorry I have spent more on lotto in the last year than i have ever won :( SatuSuro 08:10, 20 July 2008 (UTC) 15:42 (User rights log) . . Longhair (Talk | contribs) changed rights for User:Wongm from (none) to Rollbackers (Trusted user. No reason to believe misuse of the rollback tool will occur.) syncrhonicity in my edit summary and your message - i think we need to log off and hava drink or two after that :) SatuSuro 08:14, 20 July 2008 (UTC) nah blame it all on the kids :( SatuSuro 08:15, 20 July 2008 (UTC) three teenagers is why i am bald :) (not true but) SatuSuro 08:39, 20 July 2008 (UTC) The Working Man's Barnstar The Working Man's Barnstar For constantly wikifying, categorizing, and generally cleaning up and improving articles Scapler (talk) 16:38, 20 June 2008 (UTC) Response Hey, sorry for the late reply, I have taken your message into consideration, it would seem that I need to reword my AFD's, most of the reasons for deletion are options in Twinkle, but they don't actually explain much, so you write in the box below it, and that is where I am going wrong. Chafford (talk) 10:10, 19 July 2008 (UTC) Smile! Chris has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Nice work dealing with DEVOUTCATHOLICCROATIAN --Chris 12:18, 19 July 2008 (UTC) Rollback Why not. Thanks. :) Bidgee (talk) 12:22, 19 July 2008 (UTC) Now here is a section that we do not need http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Errol_Flynn#In_pop_culture - just as I am getting off for a few hours look what i stumble on - a bloody chookyard if i ever saw one - got a fox? shotgun? SatuSuro 08:46, 20 July 2008 (UTC) Yeah we lost 10 at our last place i forgot to close the gate one night :( the foxes dont seem to be able to handle the number of barking dogs we have close by in this area - anyways you are brave with your firearm - be interesting to see what the in pop cult followers say to that - so im off now cheers - nice to have a chat and all - until later SatuSuro 08:53, 20 July 2008 (UTC) Sunraysia I meant to drop by to say thanks for clarifying that. My bad. Moondyne 07:01, 22 July 2008 (UTC) I first picked up on that when I sent you the message. Yep, you seem to have had your fair share of rogues. Cochrane would've been an interesting one to get to know. Cheers. Moondyne 08:50, 22 July 2008 (UTC) Rogue reporting here - watch Moondynes edits carefully - he got a book today :) SatuSuro 12:33, 23 July 2008 (UTC) Just a check current state of oz project - cats - class=cat, project pages (viz wp project pages of talk, etc etc) class=na - i somehow think i lost a thread due to mucking around in wp in and wp nz which both have na for all of its cat and na pages - its probably early signs of senior moments etc - is there ever any sign that somewhere in wp somebody might actually try to get standardised project template practice - you dont have to answer any of that lest it incriminate me or you - it must be friday SatuSuro 02:09, 25 July 2008 (UTC) Ideally a bot - and an awake operator of such - i keep coming across cats i tagged a year ago which i am reverting to the class cat. Also many category creators never put in the oz project at talk page - who know there might be hundred of small pop cats unfound and orphaned so to speak SatuSuro 02:16, 25 July 2008 (UTC) Re: Lewis Caine Would it be possible to again ask a small favour of you to provide me with any relevant court documents relating to the murder conviction for Lewis Caine in relation to the 1988 bashing murder of David Templeton outside Lazars nightclub in King Street, Melbourne thanks? I don't have the required access to recover such documents... TIA -- Longhair\talk 07:28, 18 July 2008 (UTC) Any pre-1998 court documents relating to Keith Faure would be a bonus too thanks. Of course, my requests relate to the expansion of their Wikipedia articles. Cheers. -- Longhair\talk 10:33, 18 July 2008 (UTC) I had no luck finding anything, I'm afraid. Only the appeal from the original trial was published anywhere, and even then only in the Supreme Court's collection of unreported judgments. As far as I can tell the two trials weren't published anywhere. There is some police and prosecution material kept at the Public Records Office, but a search on Caine returned nothing, and in any event records from that recently are almost always closed to the public. --bainer (talk) 06:32, 25 July 2008 (UTC) kartano Greetings from a fellow wikipedian who grew up in Merbein and Mildura but who is now stuck in Melbourne due to work constraints. Kartano (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 10:55, 13 August 2008 (UTC) 24.61.133.186 Longhair, My oldest daughter goes to John Stark Regional High School. Not me by anymeans especially at the age of 59. she is not allowed per school orders to use Wikipedia, so to send me a message that my ability to edit will be removed I believe you have the incorrect IP. Of course, there are 11 computers in this house since I run a non-profit religious organization. My sincerest appologoes for anyone that has used one of my systems if in fact it was made from my residence for any inconveince this has called. Sincerely, Rev. Dr. Jeffrey B. Wright Ph.D. Slan Agat —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.61.133.186 (talk • contribs) 16:14, April 25, 2008 (UTC) Here have a cookie! Prom3th3an has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. {{subst:if||| {{{message}}}	subst=subst:}} To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}! Hello! You delete my page "http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/AcmePlan". Why pages of the similar companies/products are not removed? Omniplan [[7]] List of project management software [[8]] Artemis [[9]] Primavera [[10]] Microsoft Project [[11]] Merlin [[12]] New Liberal Party of India Hi Longhair, you deleted http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Liberal_Party_of_India. Please can we have our content back. We have not saved a screenshot. Also let me know if there is a chance to let the article live on wikipedia with some changes. Trophy Manager issue I'm sorry to be writing this on your page, but I don't know how else to PM you. I realize that my editing on the Hat Trick page was uncalled for but I am getting tired of noone addressing our issue. Trophy Manager is an online game just like Hat Trick and to prove that I've written twice on that page (Trophy Manager), but after the original page had been deleted, so were my comments. To keep things simple, here is a comparison between Hat Trick and Trophy Manager: HAT TRICK - 965,000 users, 122 countries, season 34, optional membership for 30 USD per year, etc. TROPHY MANAGER - 100,000 users, 124 countries, season 11, optional membership for 29 EUR per year, etc. I do not see how anyone could possibly have such double standards as to allow one but not the other to be mentioned on Wikipedia. I am obviously not very happy how the complaint system works here, either, cause I've read all of the Deletion, Undeletion, Mediation and such pages here but basically to get someone to really address this issue is apparently impossible. If anyone's willing to do that, please, my e-mail is [email protected], please advise exactly how and by writing to whom we should complain for this blatant ignoring of 100,000 users who would just like to have their Trophy Manager Wikipedia page back. Thank you and again, sorry for writing this here, but I don't know where else to write this in order to get a real response. I will sincerely appreciate an e-mail. Peace! Referencing question? Hi-e Ages ago, you tagged a page I have made MSTEC (which I have now redirected) saying it needed citing. Apart from not knowing how to do this just now, I am also unsure how to reference myself, my other half and father and members of the club and former committee members. Can you help me out at all? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Louiseann76 (talk • contribs) 06:31, 5 August 2008 (UTC)