This is an archive of past discussions with User:Liverpoolpics. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Hello, if you're going to add infoboxes, at least put some more effort to them, since the ones you are adding on Iranian-related articles aren't really an improvement. --HistoryofIran (talk) 12:56, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Wikipedia editor Blythwood just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
I've added two sources, a talk page and links to foreign-language articles and Wikispecies. I do have one concern, which is that the article describing the species is published 1989, so I'm not clear how that fits with a first described date of 1987. More citations on this topic would help.
To reply, leave a comment on Blythwood's talk page.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eden Lost until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheLongTone (talk) 14:54, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
Ways to improve Pycnosiphorus
Hi, I'm Nick Moyes. Liverpoolpics, thanks for creating Pycnosiphorus!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. It would be better if you would use the Generic Guide to New World Scaribids you included as an External Link as an in-line citation for each subsection. The infobox does unfortunately makes it look as if there's only two taxa in this genus, but your other source clearly demonstrates there are a number of other taxa - and I'd recommend listing these as bullets within the article if you don't want them all to go in the infobox.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Disagree. Your additions are a joke, especially this one which has no fields whatsoever. If you insist on adding these DISINFOBOXES to an article, seek a consensus to do so. You’ve been reverted on a few this morning because they add absolutely no value on such small articles. Per WP:BRD you next move now is to discuss; do not revert. CassiantoTalk07:35, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Too bad the one he linked to was actually removed by me, and until that point, I'd never even heard of this editor. But it remains a contender for the most pointless edit ever, I agree. Happy editing! — fortunavelut lunaRarely receiving (many) pings. Bizarre.05:32, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Liverpoolpics. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Liverpoolpics, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (talk) 16:55, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Theroadislong (talk) 15:59, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Liverpoolpics. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Antti Rahkonen, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page
Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
Hi, I'm Slatersteven. Liverpoolpics, thanks for creating Benedicto Nijaga!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This needs some references else it is going to end up at AFD.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. PamD14:49, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
There is no point in adding an infobox without any content, as you did at Filippo Casoni: please don't do this as it only clutters up the article. Thanks. PamD15:20, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Ways to improve Norröra
Hi, I'm Boleyn. Liverpoolpics, thanks for creating Norröra!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add your sources.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Cahk (talk) 09:50, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Cahk (talk) 09:51, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
Translating from other Wikipedias
It looks as if several of the articles you have "created" are exact translations of articles in other language Wikipedias, but you have not acknowledged this. You have thus claimed credit for the work of other editors in those Wikipedias, which is not fair or legal. Please read Wikipedia:Copying_within_Wikipedia#Translating_from_other_language_Wikimedia_projects (WP:TFOLWP) which explains how to give attribution to those other editors, and now go back and do so for all the articles you have translated.
I have noticed Marseille Courthouse, copied/translated from fr:Palais_de_justice_de_Marseille
(though without most of the infobox - ironically, items of straight fact as in an infobox are not subject to copyright so could probably have been copied legitimately, unless the collection of facts is considered to come within database rules), where you have claimed authorship of an article written by many different editors from 2008 onwards; Mabompré; Human rights in Senegal; Filippo Casoni and Victorine Gboko Wodié.
You also need to check all links in any article you create - the "External link" in Victorine Gboko Wodié leads to an irrelevant page, so the article is actually unsourced (as is the French one). Check that none of your links leads to a disambiguation page. (There is a wonderful gadget which turns links to dab pages orange on your screen - see "Preferences", "Gadgets", and 5 from the bottom of the list at "Appearance": tick the box, and you'll never unknowingly link to a dab page like Cardinal again).
In translating articles from other Wikipedias you have also overlooked some differences between them and English Wikipedia: our stub templates do not take parameters, and always go at the end of the article, not the top - so not {{Stub|Ivorian politician}} at the top but {{stub}} or {{IvoryCoast-politician-stub}} at the bottom. Similarly we don't link dates, even if the French do so.
If I notice another unattributed translation I will report your behaviour at WP:ANI, because Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, even when it is the copyright owned by another Wikipedia. There is a lot to learn about editing Wikipedia, and you presumably did not understand about the importance of crediting other editors with their work until now.
I'll just ping @Diannaa:, an administrator and known Copyright expert, in case there's anything I forgot to include in the above. PamD15:56, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
I've just found Verdensparken, a very substantial article "written" by you on 22 March 2018 (or by a group of Norwegian editors from 2013 onwards). If you cite a reference, it is supposed to mean that you have consulted that reference and used it to support the text you have written, and you should check that online sources still exist and still say what you are citing. You have apparently imported all the references, with their "access dates" in 2013 and 2015, from no:Verdensparken (along with translating the text). Can you take responsibility for all the content of that article as being supported by the references you have given? PamD16:18, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Just adding that you need to go back and add a properly formatted Translated page template to the talk page of each article that you translated from other Wikipedias. This is required by the terms of our CC-by-SA license. — Diannaa🍁 (talk) 16:43, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Please also remember that all articles in English wikipedia need sources. Different wikipedias have different rules. If French Wikipedia has a totally unsourced article like fr:Stjepan Stazić, you must not just translate it and add it here as an unsourced article as you did. You are responsible for sourcing all the content you add, and another language Wikipedia is not a reliable source. If there are no references, either find them, or forget that article and move on to one where you can verify that the content you are adding is supported by sources you can read and understand so that you know you are adding reliably sourced material. PamD13:02, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
A page you started (List of cathedrals in Cape Verde) has been reviewed!
You have not responded and have created more biographies of living people with no clear sources, Jean-Philippe Methelie and David Frigout - and those are just the ones I personally have come across. It has been repeatedly pointed out to you that these should have WP:INLINECITED sources and that you are repeatedly creating pages where the sourcing is nil or insufficient. Please stop and please respond to this message. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 14:36, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
As above, I have now added interwiki links, and sourced translations on all talk pages. On all the pages you note above, they were sourced very quickly after I created them, and all now contain sources. Again, as above, I did reply to your comment about this. --Liverpoolpics (talk) 07:58, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Liverpoolpics, you are not reading my messages properly. Those articles do NOT clear, WP:INLINECITED sources, which is a requirement for biographies of living people. They just have 'external links' which means 'suggestions for further reading' and does not tell readers what your sources were, aside form the fact that they need to be inline cited. Please amend this. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 17:28, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
@Boleyn and Liverpoolpics: Looking at David Frigout, the two sources only seem to cover 2002-2004, so all the earlier stuff is copied directly from French Wikipedia, where it is unsourced and may be completely imaginary for all we know. Perhaps our standards are higher than French Wikipedia, or perhaps that article in French has just slipped through any quality control net. See my comment above in #Translating from other Wikipedias about sources. PamD18:05, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
@Liverpoolpics and Boleyn: The idea is that you add sources as you write an article, to show where each piece of information comes from. I've had a bit of a look at David Frigout. One of your 5 sources is one I can't access without a password, so I don't know whether it provides any of the information which doesn't seem to be supplied in the other 4 (ie what he did between 1995 and 2003). In future please add references as you go, to show where you sourced the content: other Wikipedia articles are not a reliable source. Thanks. PamD15:55, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for creating several articles on women and their works over the past few weeks. We have become aware of your contributions thanks to research undertaken by Bobo.03 at the University of Minnesota. We think you might be interested in becoming a member of our WikiProject Women in Red where we are actively trying to reduce Wikipedia's content gender gap. You can join by using the box at the top of the WiR page. But if you would like to receive news of our activities without becoming a member, you can simply add your name to our mailing list. In any case, thank you for actively contributing to the coverage of women (currently, 17.63% of English Wikipedia's biographies).
I noticed your recent edit to Talk:Dianna Cowern does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
Thanks! Chris Troutman (talk)13:41, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
Wikipedia editor Nick Moyes just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Please add the author name and date to the infobox. Is it really necessary to say in the lead which infra-order the spider belongs to? This is in the taxobox, and so I'd recommend just including the family name in the lead sentence. We could really do with a references sectoin, and you could add a url such as https://www.jstor.org/stable/41768872?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
To reply, leave a comment on Nick Moyes's talk page.
Hi, please remember that en.WP doesn't normally link dates, years, or common terms. Also, en dashes are required for opposing scores, and year ranges – not hyphens (-). Tony(talk)08:15, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
August 2018
Hello, I'm Lord Belbury. Your recent edit to the page El Kalimat School appears to have added incorrect information, so it has been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The coordinates you added to the article were in Scotland. If there was a simple numerical typo here, I'm afraid can't work out what it was.Lord Belbury (talk) 17:08, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
1993 Damallsvenskan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
2002 Damallsvenskan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
2007 Damallsvenskan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
It also says "Best private university" in the description. I believe an infobox top image should be illustrative of the subject (preferably a seal or a logo per {{Infobox university}}), not a random person holding a microphone. I might try to contact the uploader. --Muhandes (talk) 13:17, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
Ways to improve Benedicto Nijaga
Hi, I'm Slatersteven. Liverpoolpics, thanks for creating Benedicto Nijaga!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This needs some references, both to establish notability and to verify it's claims.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Hi, I'm Boleyn. Liverpoolpics, thanks for creating Dawid Lande!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add your sources.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. If you could, please add sources to the article so that the information can be verified.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
It is disappointing that this behaviour has continued after so many attempts to communicate with you on this; please work on it in draftspace. Boleyn (talk) 19:03, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
Ways to improve Wartensleben
Hi, I'm Boleyn. Liverpoolpics, thanks for creating Wartensleben!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This is another unreferenced article; given concerns about copyvio, please work on this in draftspace.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
All three of these schools are currently red links. Lycée Edgard-Quinet (Paris) is the only one with links from other pages, and those only via Template:Lycées in Paris. There is nothing a disambiguation page can reasonably link to. Please create the articles before disambiguating them.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Hi, I'm Boleyn. Liverpoolpics, thanks for creating Lene Wikander!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This has been tagged for 2 issues.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please work on this unreferenced article in draftspace.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
Not clear what the cup is about. It needs a better lead paragraph to describe what it is, and what the format is. Then a list of the teams that qualified to participate. Remove overlinking of dates to the generic year. Could restructure the bracket to look like the 2017 version. Remove specific scorers, and provide more sources that summarize all the results from the event.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2006–07 Moroccan Throne Cup and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:2006–07 Moroccan Throne Cup, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lene Wikander until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 05:36, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi. This article has no references, so I've moved it to draft space so you can bring it up to standard before submitting for review. Deb (talk) 13:46, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
Fails WP:NSCHOOL, lacks significant coverage in multiple independent secondary sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:École privée technique Pétrelle and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:École privée technique Pétrelle, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
Hello, Liverpoolpics!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 04:34, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Frayae was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wartensleben and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Wartensleben, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
Hi, I'm Boleyn. Liverpoolpics, thanks for creating Filippo Casoni!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add your sources.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Moved to draftspace, as you did not choose to respond to this message or add clear references. You can work on it there and re-submit via WP:AFC when it is ready. Boleyn (talk) 17:09, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
2013 Moroccan Throne Cup, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
So this is a private island with only two family residences? How is this Wikipedia notable? Needs more sources detailing the subject, only one news source so far, the rest are just map-related searches. Is there a village or stores? Is it a popular tourist place?
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Norröra and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Norröra, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
You have been repeatedly asked not to create unreferenced, or unclearly referenced, articles, but have continued to do so. II have sent you many, many messages and spent hours trying to solve these issues.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by K.e.coffman was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2009 Damallsvenskan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:2009 Damallsvenskan, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
Thanks! Chris Troutman (talk) 13:41, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Lord Belbury. Your recent edit to the page El Kalimat School appears to have added incorrect information, so it has been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The coordinates you added to the article were in Scotland. If there was a simple numerical typo here, I'm afraid can't work out what it was. Lord Belbury (talk) 17:08, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
