User talk:Liveforaim

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Mudaliar/Archive 2, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. HalfShadow 18:28, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Mudaliar/Archive 2, you will be blocked from editing. HalfShadow 18:29, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Mudaliar/Archive 2, you will be blocked from editing. HalfShadow 18:30, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Editing archives

We do not normally remove content from archive files unless there is an exceptional reason. Such unexplained removal may be considered vandalism. Please explain your reason for wanting to make the removal. Do not repeat the removal without discussion or you might be blocked. Jehochman ^Talk 19:46, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kennedy alias vikram

A tag has been placed on Kennedy alias vikram requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. MuffledThud (talk) 14:23, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Talk:Mudaliar/Archive 2 has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Tiderolls 17:30, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Talk:Mudaliar/Archive 2 constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content from articles without explanation. Thank you. Zoo Fari 17:32, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

misc

Don't add other caste persons in List of kaikolar page The so-called godman was born in agamudaiyar family. [1]. Anyway he doesn't deserve to be a Mudaliar of Agamudaiyar caste and having a wikipedia page--Kaikolamudali (talk) 07:45, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]