User talk:Lirafranklin5

September 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Flag of East Timor. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Wham2001 (talk) 19:14, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

October 2021

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Cornwall, Pennsylvania—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 17:35, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

November 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Cortés Department, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop edit warring and read WP:BRD. Such small articles are classed as stubs, which indicates to other editors that they need significant expansion. Please do not remove the tag until the article is expanded. — kashmīrī ^TALK 17:02, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

November 2021

The page Cortés Department is a three-revert rule

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  BD2412 T 17:07, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Uranium Site. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Conwy have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Uranium Site (talk) 19:28, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Cortés Department, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Uranium Site (talk) 19:29, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Philroc (talk) 19:39, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Lirafranklin5 reported by User:Kashmiri (Result: ). Thank you. — kashmīrī ^TALK 17:07, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Conwy, you may be blocked from editing. Philroc (talk) 19:32, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

November 2021

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~TheresNoTime ^{(to explain!)} 19:48, 15 November 2021 (UTC)