User talk:Lgfriedmann

This is Lgfriedmann's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anna Kaiser (June 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Anna Kaiser, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This is an exact copy of Draft:Anna Kaiser.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Lgfriedmann/sandbox/Anna Kaiser and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:12, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Lgfriedmann, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 03:12, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a suspected sock puppet of Joanlavis (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this is a sock puppet account, and your original account is blocked, please also note that banned or blocked users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; and all edits made under this account may be reverted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 10:15, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lgfriedmann (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here: I am not a sock puppet account! I was trying to edit the original Anna Kaiser page but did not understand how to edit that page itself. Please unblock me. Also, to the person reviewing the Anna Kaiser page, I just wanted to add references! To make it more legitimate. But I didn't know how to access and edit the draft. So I made a new one. Please review mine instead of the older page. Isn't adding references/sources what Wikipedia is all about?

Decline reason:

Given the strong overlap in edits between the three accounts, it's just not plausible that you are unrelated to each other. This is a clear violation of WP:SOCK (or, at best, WP:MEAT, which is the same thing), wherein you violate WP:PROMO (and likely, WP:COI and WP:PAID) to write a totally inappropriate article about a person without establishing WP:NOTE. The block is appropriate here. Yamla (talk) 11:46, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lgfriedmann (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I COPIED AND PASTED BECAUSE I DIDN'T KNOW HOW TO EDIT THE PAGE. That is why there is a strong overlap. Not because we are related!

Decline reason:

You need to address all the reasons for your block in an unblock request. While I might just about assume enough good faith to suppose you just happened to come along and create this article which has happened to be the interest of a couple of sockpuppets a couple of months earlier, it still leaves the fact that the article you created is overtly promotional in tone. This leads one to suspect that you have some connection to the subject. If you decide to make another unblock request, you will need to clarify whether you have any connection whatsoever with Anna Kaiser and why you ended up creating a draft article about here that is no more than a puff piece. GoldenRing (talk) 15:47, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

MfD nomination of User:Lgfriedmann/sandbox/Anna Kaiser

User:Lgfriedmann/sandbox/Anna Kaiser, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Lgfriedmann/sandbox/Anna Kaiser and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Lgfriedmann/sandbox/Anna Kaiser during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:56, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You tell us that you did not know how to edit the page. What did you think the word "edit" at the top of the page between "read" and "view history" actually meant?--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 13:03, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]