User talk:LeilaniLad/Archive2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Manual transmission[edit]

You just reverted my edit to manual transmission. Please take a look at the history. I had made the edit, and it was subsequently reverted by ClueBot, which I reported as an incorrect detection of vandalism. Please also look at the edit I made. The existing article was in the strange situation of being doubled; that is, the entire content appeared twice on the page. I removed the duplication, which naturally appeared to be a large blanking.

69.121.197.112 (talk) 20:00, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My apologizes. Makes sense now. LeilaniLad (talk) 20:01, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fix your HG bot[edit]

Your HG bot is identifying requests for articles as vandalism, however it is not rolling back changes it identifies as vandalism. See request for articles in the biography section. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.150.11.25 (talk) 19:48, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


hello sir what can we do if someone writes without any references or wrong references on a topic which is self claimed not based no reality just write to mis guide see the article mughal kiyani and its referencebooks in reality mughal kiyani didnt exist and in its referencesbooks not a single word mughal kiyani was used —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.31.28.209 (talk) 20:00, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Francisco Franco[edit]

Can you please stop erasing the word DICTATOR referred to Francisco Franco in Franco's family articles? Franco was a dictator, not a leader. You may consult this article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spain_under_Franco Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.35.99.48 (talk) 00:45, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I did stop the revert after the second time, but generally you should include a citation before changing any biographic information that could be deemed salacious or have a negative connotation per WP:BIO. LeilaniLad (talk) 03:37, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's not about negative connotations. It's about History. Anyway, I thought it wouldn't be necessary to include more citations referred to such an obvious fact. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.35.99.48 (talk) 05:51, 4 August 2009 (UTC) [reply]

FYI[edit]

I've reproduced the conversation we had the other day on my talk page at Talk:Rorschach test/images#The question of harm. –xenotalk 14:49, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

The Original Barnstar
Given in appreciation of your diligent service. Thanks Tiderolls 23:32, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Thanks for watching over my page. See ya 'round Tiderolls 23:32, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Linkage[edit]

Thanks for the lead. I like sharing. Isn't that what Wiki's about? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.164.151.35 (talk) 02:33, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

message[edit]

It was a real edit! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shadowgcat3 (talkcontribs) 03:10, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

IM SORRY! Shadowgcat3 (talk) 03:15, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, LeilaniLad. You have new messages at Anomie's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Self-blanking[edit]

When the creator of an article blanks the page he created (usually, in response to a CSD nom), you don't have to revert the blanking as vandalism. Rather, you probably should just re-tag it with {{db-blanked}}, per WP:G7. Cheers! --SquidSK (1MClog) 18:16, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And now you're tagging a talk page for G7 speedy? I applaud your enthusiasm, but please be careful! Twinkle is a powerful tool! --SquidSK (1MClog)

Revert on The Blue School, Wells[edit]

Could I ask you to take another look at your revert on The Blue School, Wells, I believe you may have inadvertently put back the vandalism which had been previously removed.— Rod talk 22:29, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct, I undid my reversion. Thanks for the heads up. LeilaniLad (talk) 22:30, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Howard Hale Long[edit]

Hello LeilaniLad, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I declined the speedy deletion of Howard Hale Long - a page you tagged - because: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. ϢereSpielChequers 15:37, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Yo Ho Ho![edit]

Speedy deletion converted to PROD: Al Fletcher[edit]

Hello LeilaniLad. I am just letting you know that I have converted the speedy deletion tag that you placed on Al Fletcher to a proposed deletion tag, because I do not believe CSD applies to the page in question. Thank you. The WordsmithCommunicate 03:24, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Del Oro High School, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ElationAviation (talk) 05:01, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note. I did indeed mistake you for vandalism. Seems that this page is under heavy attack from someone. I'll keep an eye on it.

Fruit flies do like bananas[edit]

Deleting the article is not the only option. Did you not consider a merge to Antanaclasis? Other editors have already contested the prod. Fences&Windows 19:46, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Osbournes[edit]

Hi, just letting you know you can know you can add the url to a cite news template using the url parameter. A full list of parameters can be found at template:cite news. Reubot (talk) 14:23, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]


You caused my article to be deleted[edit]

My article was deleted after you posted a tag for quick deletion. I didn't post Hang on in time and now its gone. I spent a lot of time on the article so obviously I am upset. The article was about PPDM, an volunteer run and non profit organization that is not associated with any corporation in particular. So how can my article be advertising, if there is no profit to be had? PPDM has built a structure to organize Oil and Gas data, and yes it is Oil and Gas related. I realize not everyone loves oil and gas, but still the information should be available. There is no free, simple explanation for PPDM principles. I feel that it is an extreme dis-service to my community to delete this article. PPDM is spreading globally and the principles currently being instituted globally, especially in the United States and Canada.What can I do to appease you and can you help me have this article reinstated?


IshtarDeity (talk) 20:23, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]