User talk:Leedsrhinos325

Recent results

Hi, please don't add "recent results" or "forthcoming fixtures" to football club articles, as you did with Farsley Celtic A.F.C., as Wikipedia is not a news service. There are however many ways to expand and improve football club articles - you might want to take a look at some of our featured articles such as Arsenal F.C. for inspiration and ideas on style/layout etc. Please let me know if you need any further help or advice. Thanks. --Jameboy (talk) 22:11, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Farsley Celtic

I sympathise with the fact that the club are struggling, but Wikipedia is definitely not advertising space. I'm sure there are many things you can do outside of Wikipedia to help them raise funds. In terms of Wikipedia though, the best you can do is improve the article using reliable sources - I'm pretty sure that the better the article, the more people will read it. It may be more difficult to find information about a Non-League club, but if you have a look at the likes of York City F.C., Dover Athletic F.C., Margate F.C., Leek Town F.C. and Oxford United F.C., you will see that it is possible to get a Non-League club article up to a very high standard. Why not have a look at these articles and see if you can gain some ideas from them? If you are struggling for source material or have any other problems in getting started then you could try posting a question at the WikiProject Football talk page, where other editors who are interested in football may be able to help you. Cheers. --Jameboy (talk) 21:13, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Andy Campbell.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Andy Campbell.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:27, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of James Knowles (footballer)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article James Knowles (footballer), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Has not played in a fully professional league so fails notability requirements

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Nuttah (talk) 22:51, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of James Knowles (footballer)

I have nominated James Knowles (footballer), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Knowles (footballer) (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Nuttah (talk) 20:24, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Curtis Aspden

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Curtis Aspden, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Footballer who has not played a league game for a team competing in a fully professional league

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Nuttah (talk) 20:29, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dominic Krief

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Dominic Krief, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Footballer who has not played a league game for a team competing in a fully professional league

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Nuttah (talk) 20:33, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to User talk:Nuttah, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Closedmouth (talk) 12:26, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		For you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Nigel4321 (talk) 12:19, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to MMR vaccine has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alexius08 (talk) 11:15, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to MMR vaccine constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content from articles without explanation. Thank you. Alexius08 (talk) 11:19, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to 6 July. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --CalendarWatcher (talk) 09:12, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Dominic Krief

I have nominated Dominic Krief, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dominic Krief. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. CalendarWatcher (talk) 09:15, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Micah Richards. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Olly¹⁵⁰ 12:48, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page William Golding has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. RazielZero (talk) 11:04, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page William Golding. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. RazielZero (talk) 11:09, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at File:Joe.JPG, you will be blocked from editing.

Keith D (talk) 13:16, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Lord of the Flies. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing.

Keith D (talk) 13:18, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Suicide, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Marek.69 ^talk 14:53, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:MVC-039S.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:MVC-039S.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Haruth (talk) 16:55, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Farsley AFC

A tag has been placed on Farsley AFC requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guidelines for people and for organizations. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. noq (talk) 19:33, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Farsley AFC, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. noq (talk) 19:47, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Farsley AFC page

Hi

I was planning on setting up a new page for Farsley AFC (I've been editing the Celtic / Throstle Nest / Neil Parsley pages) and noticed you'd created a page which had been deleted by an admin. I've got them to restore it - they've stuck it under my user account for now - but they say we need to cite third-party references to the club before it can be published. Hopefully there will be some references next week after the NCEL AGM, so I'll try to get it back into circulation ASAP.

regards

Chris —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chris Dunford-Kelk (talk • contribs) 11:41, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Farsley AFC page

Hi

I was planning on setting up a new page for Farsley AFC (I've been editing the Celtic / Throstle Nest / Neil Parsley pages) and noticed you'd created a page which had been deleted by an admin. I've got them to restore it - they've stuck it under my user account for now - but they say we need to cite third-party references to the club before it can be published. Hopefully there will be some references next week after the NCEL AGM, so I'll try to get it back into circulation ASAP.

regards

Chris

Chris Dunford-Kelk (talk) 11:43, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Farsley AFC

I have nominated Farsley AFC, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Farsley AFC. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. noq (talk) 00:08, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 10:57, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:JoeSanderson12.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:JoeSanderson12.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:12, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]