User talk:Leca67

File copyright problem with File:Leca img 03.JPG[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Leca img 03.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Eeekster (talk) 08:59, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This account, Leca67, has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia, because your username does not meet our username policy.

Your username is the only reason for this block. You are welcome to choose a new username (see below).

A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive, or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account.

Please choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines. However, do not create a new account if you wish to credit your existing contributions to a new name through a username change. To request a username change:

Add {{unblock-un|your new username here}} on your user talk page. You should be able to edit this talk page even though you are blocked. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "E-mail this user" on their talk page.
At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a list of names that have already been taken. For more information, please see Wikipedia:Changing username.

If you feel that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Closedmouth (talk) 10:45, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Allowing username change to krose1967 (talk · contribs). Please put this request in at Wikipedia:Changing username as soon as possible to avoid re-blocking.

Request handled by: Ronhjones ^(Talk) 00:09, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

File source problem with File:Characteristics leca.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Characteristics leca.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:40, 20 December 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:40, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Characteristics leca.JPG listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Characteristics leca.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILY ^(TALK) 10:30, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Odor filter 2.JPG listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Odor filter 2.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILY ^(TALK) 10:30, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 11:14, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Production exclay 4.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Production exclay 4.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:29, 31 December 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:29, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Production exclay 4.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Production exclay 4.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:30, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for spam, advertising, or promotion. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Blueboy 96 20:59, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Leca67 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have absolutely no intention to make "spam, advertising, or promotion", but simply describe the various applications of expanded clay - I thought wikipedia was an information site??? The Leca site was deleted earlier for same reason, but I have done nothing more than uploading application / user areas, which I think is useful information??? If you think it is commercial to present the different internet sites, I can remove them, eventhough I think its a way for the user to find more information. I appreciate very much the site open again and information on what to remove to make it "less commercial" after your opinion!!!--Leca67 (talk) 13:11, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

See below. Please have only one unblock request open at a time. — Daniel Case (talk) 17:51, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

File:Odor filter.JPG listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Odor filter.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 09:02, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I would appreciate an explination why you deleted my picture - Its mine and I (think) I stated that during upload??? --Leca67 (talk) 13:55, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Production exclay 1.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Production exclay 1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 09:03, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Production exclay 2.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Production exclay 2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 09:04, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Production exclay 3.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Production exclay 3.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 09:04, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Production exclay 1a.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Production exclay 1a.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 09:05, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Production exclay 1b.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Production exclay 1b.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 09:05, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pork urine tanque.JPG listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pork urine tanque.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 09:05, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hydrophonics 01.JPG listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hydrophonics 01.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 09:05, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hydrophonics 02.JPG listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hydrophonics 02.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 09:05, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hydrophonics 03.JPG listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hydrophonics 03.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 09:05, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hydrophonics 04.JPG listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hydrophonics 04.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 09:05, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Xblocks.JPG listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Xblocks.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 09:06, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:XEnergy blocks.JPG listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:XEnergy blocks.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 09:06, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Xchimney.JPG listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Xchimney.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 09:06, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Xfloor slab.JPG listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Xfloor slab.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 09:06, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I would appreciate very much an explination on how to mark MY OWN PHOTOS??? Up-loaded as own photos, with free access and still you remove them...??? --Leca67 (talk) 13:37, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock / Rename[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Leca67 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have absolutely no intention to make "spam, advertising, or promotion", but simply describe the various applications of expanded clay - I thought wikipedia was an information site??? The Leca site was deleted earlier for same reason, but I have done nothing more than uploading application / user areas, which I think is useful information??? If you think it is commercial to present the different internet sites, I can remove them, eventhough I think its a way for the user to find more information. I appreciate very much the site open again and information on what to remove to make it "less commercial" after your opinion!!!

Decline reason:

First, you never changed your username, despite being given 24 hours to do so after your unblock explicitly and solely for that purpose. Second, Wikipedia's spam policy includes posting information about a subject you have a close connection to and an assumed promotional purpose. Third, see our external links policy for what can and can't be included in that department. — Daniel Case (talk) 17:50, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

--Leca67 (talk) 13:35, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, I am not 100% familiar with wikipedia and similar internet programs why my attempt to change the username didn't work. Actually I tried to change the name to "exclay1967", which was accepted (I think), but when I tried to enter wikipedia with this new username is wasn't posible??? - Why I continued to use Leca67. I am myself using wikipedia often as I think it is a fantastic information source, why I also wanted to give some of my knowledge to the users. Maybe I listed too many links to commercial sites, but this was only to give the readers the opportunity to get more information - thse links can be deleted. My intension was to give information on the use of expanded clay, not to make any commercial "stunt". Actually, after the site was re-opened the first time by "Fastily", I only up-loaded technical information on production and applications. If this information isn't in the spite of Wikipedia I will ofcause not up-load more such information. Once again, I appreciate if you could consider my request to un-block the site. And, I also appreciate that you help users like myself - not 100% familiar on wikipedia, when having troubles, instead of "just cutting off". --Leca67 (talk) 20:27, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You can't change the username yourself. One of our bureaucrats has to review your request and do it for you. Daniel Case (talk) 06:00, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply - As you (maybe) can read on user talk page, I have already requested the change of user name. If accepted, will you consider to "release" or un-block the page about Leca? Best regards - --Leca67 (talk) 09:26, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock-un|exclay1967}} --Leca67 (talk) 20:30, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Allowing username change to exclay1967 (talk · contribs). Please put this request in at Wikipedia:Changing username as soon as possible to avoid re-blocking.

Request handled by: Daniel Case (talk) 14:40, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

Please get it right this time. Don't edit until your username is changed. Daniel Case (talk) 14:40, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I have now asked for wikipedia to change my username. When done, will you consider to re-open the Leca site??? --Leca67 (talk) 12:18, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How long will it take for the Wikipedia to decide on my new username - I did the request on the 9th of January 2010??? If not possible to use the proposed "Exclay1967" I can choose another. Please help me! --Leca67 (talk) 12:18, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- CHU Clerk note: I had added a {{clerknote}} to your request for a new user name. My apologies for taking so long to respond, and for not thinking to add a note to your talk page about it two days ago. Having reviewed your account's contributions i agree with Avi that any name involving clay would be controversial. To resolve this i suggest either Krose1967 (talk · contribs) which you mention above in an unblock request or Kr67 (talk · contribs) if the other is a reference to your real name. delirious & lost ☯ ^~hugs~ 20:15, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Your suggestion Kr67 (talk · contribs) is perfectly OK for me. How to proceed? Do I need to make a new request for changing my username or??? --Leca67 (talk) 09:03, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can anybody help? Do I need to make a new change of username request??? --Leca67 (talk) 07:41, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Leca67 → Kr67[edit]

Current name: Leca67 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · target logs · block log · list user · global contribs · central auth · Google) (ping user)
Requested name: Kr67 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · target logs · block log · list user · global contribs · central auth · Google)
Previous renames: current user, target user, Queue: open req, closed req
For global renamer: rename user
Reason: Request from CHU - see clerknote above.

File:Production exclay 1.jpg missing description details[edit]

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Production exclay 1.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.