User talk:Leaky caldron/Archives/2019/February

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/GiantSnowman/Proposed decision

It's just been pointed out to me that the header says "all editors must create a section for their statement and comment only in their own section.". I was going to remove my comment, but to do so now would leave your subsequent reply out of context. I can remove both if you're happy for that to be the case, or I'll remove my own comment and you can remove yours or leave it there, or do anything else you prefer to do, it's your thoughts I am trying to keep out of. Fish+Karate 11:49, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Yes - deleting both is ok with me. Thanks Leaky caldron (talk) 11:52, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Hat in the ring

Yo Leeks. I think you'll find it is a boxing expression rather than a circus one. But I tend to agree with you about ever more hoops. Many thanks for that link to the Great Farini. RfA is useful after all, it seems. Martinevans123 (talk) 11:44, 15 February 2019 (UTC)