User talk:Laura Leezy/sandbox

I like your structure and how you break down your work it looks really good Neutrality of language could be better, personally I would try and sound more neutral. Your Grammer is good, I really like how you structured your work. RutgersMark (talk) 18:47, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

Neutrality of Language

You are doing a great job so far with neutrality of your language. You are framing and attributing each perspective to the right people. Futuroabogado3511 (talk) 18:51, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

Neutrality

The language used in these paragraphs is nice and neutral. Great delivery of facts, good pacing, and well written! Harleiquill (talk) 17:12, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

I think that being able to stay neutral on such a negative subject can be hard sometimes, but I think you did a good job of just giving the facts about the problem and how they came about a solution. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chw2022 (talk • contribs) 18:59, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

Illegal Dumping

The project you mentioned is slated to be done a couple of months ago. Have there been no updates posted? Any way to find out if this was finished and successful in its mission? I think that would be a nice closure to that paragraph, but I understand if it hasn't been spoken of or published it may be hard to find a source for that. I'll see if I can dig anything up for you. Harleiquill (talk) 17:13, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Great point. So far, I can't locate anything for this past 2023. I'll have to look into government reports or something like that. I am also planning to actually visit the site and take some photos...guess I'll find out for myself but then I can't write about it. Darn original research. Laura Leezy (talk) 18:29, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Is there any information you can find that talk about the effect the the land fill on the surrounding neighborhoods? Maybe something like the water quality or even the smell. I think persons point of view that actually lived there and had to deal with it would be great. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chw2022 (talk • contribs) 18:58, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

For the radioactive soil, will they ever be able to use the land for anything, or are they just going to leave it as is. We talked about how they don't really want it to be publicized, have there been any big recent form of publicity that has been made about, positive or negative. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chw2022 (talk • contribs) 19:05, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

Notability

These are some excellent events, and I firmly believe the notability of each event is very clear to see. I appreciate that you have multiple examples here.

Will these be placed under the Environmental tab ?

I noticed that under Superfund Sites nested under Environmental there is a mention of the gas thing, I wonder if you might be able to incorporate your information there so we don't have repetitive information going in. Harleiquill (talk) 17:16, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Exactly, my first two headers are essentially "updates" on issues that already exist on main page. They'll be tucked neatly in their place. Laura Leezy (talk) 18:31, 17 April 2024 (UTC)