Jump to content

User talk:Ksenjamajanov

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A cup of coffee for you!

[edit]
Thanks for the new article on the 2002 Diaz pipeline incident; interesting to see how long these events have an impact. Klbrain (talk) 12:49, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Whistlegraph (June 19)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 09:21, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Ksenjamajanov! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 09:21, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Whistlegraph has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Whistlegraph. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 10:12, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Whistlegraph (June 19)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Relativity were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Relativity ⚡️ 10:18, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Whistlegraph (June 20)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
bonadea contributions talk 09:25, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't remove draft templates

[edit]

Hi Ksenjamajanov, previously you have removed some templates from Draft:Whistlegraph (for instance here). Please do not do that. The comment "Do not remove this line!" doesn't refer only to that comment, but to the entire line that starts with {{AFC submission or {{AFC comment. If the draft should be accepted by a reviewer, these templates will be removed automatically, but until then they need to stay. Thanks! --bonadea contributions talk 09:34, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

[edit]
Hello, Ksenjamajanov. You have new messages at Relativity's talk page.
Message added 10:32, 20 June 2024 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Rel8ivity — Alternate account of Relativity (talk) 10:32, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Whistlegraph

[edit]

I've been watching the draft and it keeps drifting towards worse rather than better. If you want to get the draft accepted, it may be time to go the "less is more" route since your ideas about how to make the draft "better" are quite clearly at odds with what reviewers are asking to see by way of improvement.

I'm also in doubt about the ability of your references to establish notability, but if they can, then you need to eliminate everything else that can't.

Do not try to use their website, or social media posts (including Soundcloud, Spotify, or YouTube) as references. I doubt that Rhizome can be used, particularly not for the artist bios, since those do not represent independent reporting about them, and Rhizome itself, while it has a Wikipedia article, is more of an art promoter than a news organization.

I'm afraid that doesn't leave very much out of which you can build a draft, but if there is to be an accepted draft somewhere in what you've presented it will be based on this residue. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 05:34, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! i greatly appreciate your feedback. I have since removed unreliable sourced (EG their own website, social media references) and i'm working on finding other reliable sources. thank you! Ksenjamajanov (talk) 07:43, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Whistlegraph (June 22)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Ratnahastin was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.
Ratnahastin (talk) 10:20, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stabilo Point 88 (June 24)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ratnahastin was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Ratnahastin (talk) 10:05, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Pahunkat. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Musical.ly have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Pahunkat (talk) 00:34, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]