User talk:Kristifor Kendjelac

Welcome[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, the greatest encyclopedia on Earth! You seem to be off to a good start. Hopefully you will soon join the vast army of Wikipediholics!

You may wish to review the welcome page, tutorial, and stylebook, as well as the avoiding common mistakes and Wikipedia is not pages.

Here are some helpful links:

Wikipedia:Merge, for information about merging, renaming and moving pages.
Wikipedia directory is also quite useful.
Meet other new users You may want to add yourself to the Wikipedia new user log.
Assign edits to your username from before you registered.
Be Bold!
Don't let grumpy users scare you off.
Play nice with others
Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
Tell us about you
How to upload files and image copyright tags.

By the way, an important tip: To sign comments on talk pages, simply type four tildes, like this: ~~~~. This will automatically add your name and the time after your comments.

Hope to see you around the Wiki! If you have any questions whatsoever, feel free to contact me on my talk page :)

Joe I 03:37, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Blanked Page[edit]

On 30-Dec, you blanked Kikinda Municipality. Blanking pages is generally considered a bad idea. I've gone ahead and reverted the change. If it was a mistake, that's fine. If you think the redirect is inappropriate, then it should be replaced with a stub or put up for deletion. Thanks. -- JLaTondre 14:54, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Kikinda3.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Kikinda3.JPG. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 06:00, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Suvaca.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Suvaca.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 23:06, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Mapa2.gif[edit]

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Mapa2.gif. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. Shyam ^(T/C) 13:47, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Suvaca u Kikindi.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Suvaca u Kikindi.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:09, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Kikinda1.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:Kikinda1.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, a non-profit website, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it, but use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 06:57, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Suvaca u Kikindi.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Suvaca u Kikindi.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Chowbok ☠ 05:59, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image talk:Katolicka crkva.jpg[edit]

I have responded at Image talk:Katolicka crkva.jpg. —An gr 10:38, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:SO Kikinda.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:SO Kikinda.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:06, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Srdjan tesin.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Srdjan tesin.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:10, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

More replaceable fair use images[edit]

Image:Srdjan tesin.jpg

—Chowbok ☠ 19:27, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Ilic Tesin Palavestra.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Ilic Tesin Palavestra.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:07, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Imena[edit]

Članak Kikinda sam pre svega napravio da bude u skladu sa svim ostalim člancima o većim gradovima Srbije. U prvoj rečenici članka treba da budu neke mnogo važnije informacije o gradu i opštini nego što su imena na drugim jezicima koja, da budemo iskreni, uopšte nisu u nekoj široj upotrebi, pa prema tome ne predstavljaju informaciju toliko značajnu da bi je morali staviti u prvu rečenicu (svako ta imena može da nađe tamo gde se nalaze sada i nema razloga da čitaocu u prvoj rečenici nabijamo na nos nevažne informacije). Što se tiče drugih članaka, u svim ostalim člancima o većim gradovima Srbije je ovo pitanje rešeno na isti način, a ako pogledamo i naše okruženje, onda na primer možemo probati da napišemo ćirilična imena za veće hrvatske gradove i to ne u prvu rečenicu u tim člancima već u poslednji pasus, pa se mogu kladiti da neće proći ni jedan jedini dan a da neko ta ćirilična imena ne obriše. Ja ova imena u članku Kikinda nisam obrisao već sam ih stavio na mesto koje odgovara njihovom značaju. PANONIAN (talk) 22:26, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ne vidim zašto bi članak Kikinda bio napisan po ugledu na članke o gradovima u nekim susednim državama a ne po ugledu na članke o gradovima u Srbiji. A što se tiče te tolerancije, ti koji od nas navodno traže da budemo tolerantni, sami uopšte nisu tolerantni. Možeš na primer na Vikipediji primetiti rad izvesnog mađarskog fotografa koji slika crkve u Vojvodini, i onda u članak o selu u kom su većina Srbi obavezno na prvo mesto stavi sliku katoličke crkve a tek iza nje sliku pravoslavne. Pa jel to tolerancija? O tim takozvanim braniocima tolerancije se može napisati podebela knjiga koja ih prikazuje u malo drugačijem svetlu. Međutim, članci na Vikipediji nemaju nikakve veze sa tolerancijom, već im je cilj da čitaoce informišu o temi, pa samim tim ta imena na drugim jezicima nemaju neku naročitu informativnu ulogu. Takođe ne vidim da je 50% + 1 građana Kikinde potpisalo peticiju da ta imena treba da stoje u prvoj rečenici članka na Vikipediji, a i o toleranciji u samom gradu dovoljno govori činjenica da je gradonačelnik Kikinde iz SRS (a razlog zašto je SRS tako jaka u Vojvodini je upravo natrljavanje ljudima na nos te i takve tolerancije). PANONIAN (talk) 22:56, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dakle, ja ne smatram da imam konzervativne ideje (na primer čak podržavam i nezavisno Kosovo ako ćemo već tako pričati), niti smatram da je moj rad ovde ekstremizam. Na primer u opštinama kao što je Senta gde su Mađari većina sigurno ne bih uklonio mađarsko ime iz infoboxa, niti bih u članku o selu Bogojevo gde su opet Mađari većina stavio sliku pravoslavne crkve pre katoličke. Međutim, ako već govorimo o ekstremizmu pojedinih naroda, srpskim ekstremizmom se može nazvati srpska politika prema Kosovu, dok je u slučaju Vojvodine mnogo jači mađarski ekstremizam. Treba svakako primetiti činjenicu da je osoba koja je stavljala ta mađarska imena u prve rečenice u stvari velikomađarski ekstremista koji živi u Budimpešti i iz čijih izmena se može videti da stalno "zeza" članke vezane za Slovačku, Rumuniju ili Vojvodinu, a uzgred je bio već nekoliko puta blokiran zbog svog ponašanja. Sada o relevantnosti samih imena: Vojvodina ima 6 a ne 4 službena jezika, ali Vikipedija je pre svega enciklopedija koja nije dužna da prati službene stavove već naučne principe. Na primer potpuno je jasno da mađarsko ime za gradove Senta ili Čoka ima značaja jer većina stanovnika ovih mesta koristi ta imena, ali relevantnost tih imena u mestima gde ima svega 5-10% Mađara je sa naučnog stanovišta veoma mala. Dakle, ponavljam, ovo treba da bude naučna enciklopedija, a ne politički pamflet o toleranciji. Pored toga, postoji i članak Hungarian exonyms (Vojvodina) gde se nalazi spisak svih mađarskih imena za mesta u Vojvodini, čime je naučna potreba za informacijom o tim imenima potpuno zadovoljena, tako da ne postoji nikakva potreba da ta imena stoje u prvoj rečenici ili u infoboxu članaka o mestima gde ne živi velik broj Mađara (što opet ne znači da ta imena ne možemo pomenuti u drugom delu članka predviđenom za to). A što se tiče toga da li će neko zameriti na to, na Vikipediji ima mađarskih korisnika sa kojima sam do sada imao pozitivna iskustva i koji sigurno neće zameriti zbog toga - a to da li će onaj bolesni velikomađarski ekstremista iz Budimpešte nešto zameriti, to je već njegov lični problem koji se lako može izlečiti kod psihoanalitičara. PANONIAN (talk) 14:22, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pa što se tiče gospodina iz Budimpešte, on je sasvim slučajno odabrao Kikindu pored drugih članaka, a ako mu opet tako nešto padne na pamet, male su šanse da će ponovo odabrati Kikindu pored toliko drugih mesta u Vojvodini, Slovačkoj i Transilvaniji, tako da nema razloga za strah da će članak biti vandalizovan. A i inače, bolje da te upozorim da je to najmanji problem koji ćeš imati sa tim člankom, jer ja sam na primer pisao članak o Novom Sadu, onda su drugi ljudi iz Novog Sada počeli to da uređuju, pa su tu nastali svakakvi sukobi oko banalnih stvari, da li slika da bude 300 ili 400 px, da li manje fudbalske klubove pomenuti u članku ili ne, itd. Kada više ljudi iz Kikinde počne to da uređuje, imaćeš i ti takvih problema, a ovo sa imenima je sitnica. PANONIAN (talk) 04:39, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I samo jedan predlog: pošto ja ne znam puno o poznatim Kikinđanima, trebalo bi u članku kod svakog imena napisati kakve konkretne veze ima sa Kikindom - da li je tu rođen i živeo, da li je tu samo rođen a živeo na drugom mestu ili da li je rođen na drugom mestu a živeo u Kikindi, itd. PANONIAN (talk) 04:42, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

wikiproject[edit]

As a member of WikiProject Serbia, you should be aware that the project as well as Portal:Serbia is being considered for deletion. If you have the time, please comment on what you feel should be done with the project and the portal. Thank you. // Laughing Man 01:52, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

University of Pristina[edit]

Pogledaj ovu diskusiju [1] i ukljuci se ako mozes. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Andrija.b (talk • contribs) 19:32, 11 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Pictures of Lisbon[edit]

Do you have permission from the copyright holder of those images to upload them here and release all rights? (ESkog)^(Talk) 23:32, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I do. It is my wife :) Kristifor Kendjelac)^(Talk)

Image permission problem with Image:Katolicka crkva.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Katolicka crkva.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 19:20, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image permission problem with Image:Cudna zgrada.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Cudna zgrada.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 19:20, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image permission problem with Image:Generala drapsina.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Generala drapsina.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 19:20, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image permission problem with Image:Pozoriste.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Pozoriste.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 19:20, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image permission problem with Image:Kindja.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Kindja.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 19:20, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Deciji.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Deciji.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:40, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image permission problem with Image:Orthodox Church.JPG[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Orthodox Church.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 18:01, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Muzej.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Muzej.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:09, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Oilrigssmall.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Oilrigssmall.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:15, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Blandas.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Blandas.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:29, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Ki mapa eng.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Ki mapa eng.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:47, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Terra.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Terra.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:27, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Gulbenkian Park.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Gulbenkian Park.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:02, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Largo do Camões.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Largo do Camões.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:38, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:KARTA copy.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:KARTA copy.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:38, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Lisbon cable car.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Lisbon cable car.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:41, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Sintra Town Hall Câmara Municipal.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Sintra Town Hall Câmara Municipal.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:41, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Lala the Kikinda town mascot .gif[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lala the Kikinda town mascot .gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:43, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]