User talk:Kgrange

Urgent Feedback Help![edit]

I'm looking for someone to give feedback to my page Cellular Manufacturing

Please help!

Meganlaw15 06:23, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Kgrange, and Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay.
Here are some good links that you might find useful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please be sure to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or just three tildes (~~~) to produce your name only. If you have any questions, or are worried/confused about anything at all, you can leave a new message on my talk page, or put {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to help you. Happy editing, good luck, and remember: Be Bold!

— FireFox 21:23, 30 January 2007

License tagging for Image:Cape Cod six.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Cape Cod six.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:05, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Use of Preview and the Edit summary[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. However, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thanks again.

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. -- MightyWarrior 19:41, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome and comments[edit]

Best you can do is just keep plugging away. You may make mistakes, but someone else will come in and fix them--or chew on you-- or something. Two things help a lot:

1) Surf wikilinks and learn where all the other horse articles are hiding, there are a TON, many not well linked, (many not well-written, but that's another problem), some with very illogical titles. The categories at the bottom of articles are another good place to look to find more related articles...

2) Be really careful to read the whole article before editing one you haven't worked on. Everyone has their pet peeve, mine is people who put in material that is already discussed elsewhere in the article, or, worse yet, if there is a link to a "main article" starts discussing something we just moved over from a general article to a more detailed article...

The help sections are extensive and ultimately tell you everything you need to know, though sometimes figuring them out is a pain, and there's always a few really anal-retentive people who will be sure to gripe at you for relatively minor "sins."

Be sure to write as well as possible. "Compelling prose" is one thing we really need to try for. Also try to get into the habit of noting your sources, at least in an external links section, and preferably as footnotes.

If you are curious about things that wikipedians like to see, check out Horses in warfare, I was the lead editor that took a crappy weak article and made it into one that was granted "Good Article" status. I also did the same for Arabian horse. My current project is Equine nutrition, which I had a little hiccup with because I put in too much source material at first without proper footnoting, but it's better now...I want to tweak it a bit more, but will probably be putting it up for Good Article status soon.

If you want to do anything drastic, ask on the talk page first, and if no one whines in a couple of days, then try it in the article. Over time, you begin to get a sense of which articles have vigilant editors and which ones no one cares about.

Anyway, have fun, and good luck! Montanabw 00:55, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]