User talk:KevinRippy
April 2020
[edit]Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Militia organizations in the United States, you may be blocked from editing. Also edit warring. It would appear you are the same person who was editing this article as an IP. Woerich (talk) 17:47, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Militia organizations in the United States shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Woerich (talk) 17:48, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
- Passing administrators, please note prior edits and edit-warring behavior from IP address, User talk:107.77.230.95 Woerich (talk) 17:50, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
ai removed disinformation and anti policy slanted one sided information. i left in information that pertained to the subject. and removed the derogatory information that should nt be included i. the information. the information i coppied was directly from the United States constitution and i removed opinionated bogus information KevinRippy (talk) 17:53, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
- The changes you are making appear to be politically motivated and push a point of view. If you believe otherwise, please discuss your concerns in the article talk page first. Woerich (talk) 17:55, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Doug Weller talk 18:04, 13 April 2020 (UTC)