User talk:Kettlebelly

Blocked

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of Trekphiler (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:52, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kettlebelly (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You've deleted all mention of the userpage, & left no way to contact anybody to request it be restored or retrieved, or to ever have the block lifted. What do you expect?

Decline reason:

We expect what we always expected, that you'll follow Wikipedia's policies and in this case, not evade your block. WP:UTRS is available to you on your original account. Note that you are now one strike away from a ban, rather than just a block, under WP:3X. I very strongly advise you not bother UTRS for at least six months, as your abuse here all but guarantees any unblock request will be declined until then. If you are able to go six months with zero edits, you should apply under WP:SO. Again, though, even a single additional instance of block evasion would mean a ban. Yamla (talk) 00:23, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

"WP:UTRS is available" Really? Nice to say that a year ago. Nice to wait until after deleting the userpage to say it.

And since this account is blocked, I'd love to know how I'm going to make any edits or any requests of anybody, now or in six months, since I found no way to contact anybody in the first fucking place. Of course, you don't care, do you? Why would you? You wanted me gone & you got your way, & as long as I stay gone, you're happy. Kettlebelly (talk) 00:33, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Email

I'm unwilling to provide you the content of the page we deleted. There's nothing substantial there, nothing meaningful to salvage, and you are not an editor in good standing. Other admins may feel differently. --Yamla (talk) 13:09, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to clarify my statement. I would consider it entirely appropriate for you to contact one other admin to request the content. Another admin might well feel differently and might be happy to provide it for you. You are also welcome to send me one more email if you wish me to post your specific request here, such that any other admin may solve it for you without you having to contact anyone else by email. Your request wasn't abusive, I'm just not willing to satisfy it. --Yamla (talk) 13:13, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Email access revoked. --Yamla (talk) 11:41, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]