User talk:KemariMendes2908

Welcome![edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Draft:Dihydroxyamine, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless that text is available under a suitable free license. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:

If you still have questions, there is the Teahouse, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 15:49, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Dihydroxyamine has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Dihydroxyamine. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 16:21, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dihydroxyamine has been accepted[edit]

Dihydroxyamine, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 16:27, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Dihydroxyamine, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 14:46, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To explain...a tautomer is the same set of atoms (the same "molecular formula", just different bonding positions). So (HO)₂NH and [NH₃-OH]⁺ do not meet that definition. Those two have different numbers of hydrogen atoms and oxygen atoms, and a different total charge.

A tautomer also "easily converts". From (HO)₂NH to NH₂O-OH is an easy transfer of H from N to O. But it seems difficult for to swap the OH from N to O to get NH₂-O-OH. It really looks simple ("just rewrite the atoms in a different place"). But that does not mean it actually is doable. That's why wikipedia articles need citations, like a bibliography for a school paper. DMacks (talk) 14:56, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dihydroxyamine[edit]

The article Dihydroxyamine has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable hypothetical compound (per talkpage, neither of the two chemicals that have been discussed at this page)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DMacks (talk) 05:42, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Dihydroxyamine[edit]

Hello KemariMendes2908, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Dihydroxyamine, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dihydroxyamine.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Graeme Bartlett}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:17, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Addition of other names[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. This is in relation to a series of adding other names to various articles for chemicals that are not accepted. Please be sure to only update boxes with names that are accepted and please be willing to provide citations in the event of a dispute over the name. Thank you. EvilxFish (talk) 07:54, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. The Wordsmith^{Talk to me} 03:20, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Diamminesilver(I)[edit]

Hello, KemariMendes2908. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Diamminesilver(I), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:05, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Diamminesilver(I)[edit]

Hello, KemariMendes2908. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Diamminesilver".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:50, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]