User talk:Kautuk1

Pritisangam

Error in infobox.
I have replaced rear with rare. Xx236 (talk) 10:17, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Hello, I'm Utcursch. I noticed that you recently removed content from Nashik without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. utcursch | talk 15:07, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Kautuk1. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kundalika River, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bhira (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:21, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rohit Raut for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rohit Raut is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rohit Raut until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 15:46, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Kautuk1, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Suhas Palshikar have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:30, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Shubhangi Gokhale

Hello Kautuk1,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Shubhangi Gokhale for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:35, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is rewritten now... Kautuk1 (talk) 12:30, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Asha Khadilkar. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 23:06, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Sandesh Kulkarni

Hello, Kautuk1,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Sandesh Kulkarni should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandesh Kulkarni .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:45, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Kautuk1. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Sanjay Mone, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Brad v 20:42, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Shubhangi Gokhale

The article Shubhangi Gokhale has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage in reliable media.Fly-by-actress.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ∯WBG^converse 08:45, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Saputara, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 20:49, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Hello, I'm Akhiljaxxn. I noticed that you recently removed content from Vinayak Damodar Savarkar without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Akhiljaxxn (talk) 11:59, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Kautuk1, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Kautuk1|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. ∯WBG^converse 16:28, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Winged Blades of Godric I really wonder how you came to conclusion that I get paid for the edits or I have a financial stake. I am editor for last many years and I have contributed to varied topics. I am working on Wikipedia as a hobby and I get pleasure while working on it.Kindly check my edits for last many years and you can easily understand this. If you still have any issues, pls. let me know.

Sorry to inform you but I am really upset with the above messege. It would have been better if you would have validated first and then informed. Kautuk1 (talk) 04:55, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Kautuk1. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Featured status

Do not added featured icons to unreviewed articles as you did in Sulochana Latkar filmography. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:28, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright infringement

Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. You must not copy and paste text from sources you find on the web into articles as you did in the article Sulochana Latkar filmography. I have removed the infringing text, but the material you copied is subject to copyright, as is almost everything on the web, and when creating or expanding articles, you should completely rewrite the information from the source using your own words. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:28, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I apologise for my error in thinking that the paragraph concerned had been copied from a copyright source. The other site must have copied the Sulochana Latkar Wikipedia article. I have returned the filmography to its previous state. When you copy text from another Wikipedia article you should mention it in your edit summary. So, no copyright infringement, but you must not add "featured content" tags to articles as you did here. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:18, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cwmhiraeth, Thanks for your understanding... Kautuk1 (talk) 10:16, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

Hello, I'm Kautilya3. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Barkha Dutt, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 18:51, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

TheFamousPeople.com as a source

Hi Kautuk1. I noticed that you recently used thefamouspeople.com as a source in Subhas Chandra Bose. Please note that there is general consensus that thefamouspeople.com does not meet the reliable sourcing criteria for such information. (Discussions here and here). If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks. --Ronz (talk) 23:30, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Geetai moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Geetai, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Britishfinance (talk) 16:37, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Jammu and Kashmir. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:02, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Maratha Empire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Afzal Khan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 00:40, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sharad Ponkshe moved to draftspace

Sorry, this is not accapetbale sourcing. We require a good deal more than promotional listings and crowd-sourced material to demonstrate that an actor is notable. Please have a look at WP:BASIC, which lays out the reqiirements. In a nutshell, you need to present in-depth coverage in magazines, newspapers, and reviews. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 16:54, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Geetai

Hello, Kautuk1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Geetai".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Interstellarity (talk) 18:46, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vitthalrao Gadgil, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page INC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:24, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 17

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Dattatreya (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Gangapur, Basar, Karanja, Amrapur and Balekundri

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:27, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sharad Ponkshe has been accepted

Sharad Ponkshe, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Missvain (talk) 19:44, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

Hello, I'm TonyTheTiger. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Lata Mangeshkar have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 05:53, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kaivalya Kumar Gurav

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kaivalya Kumar Gurav requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Accesscrawl (talk) 16:45, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Girnar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Datta.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:31, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Subhas Chandra Bose, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Walrus Ji (talk) 08:54, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Walrus Ji (talk) 08:56, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:BIMSTEC

Template:BIMSTEC has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:41, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 108 Names of Ganesh

The article 108 Names of Ganesh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to be entirely copy pasted from one unreliable source and not sure an article is warranted for the topic.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chronikhiles ^(talk) 06:12, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dwarkanath Sanzgiri for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dwarkanath Sanzgiri is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dwarkanath Sanzgiri until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 22:08, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]