User talk:Karin Ahre

August 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to John Rees (journalist), it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. MB 02:12, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

First, normal communication on Wikipedia is through these talk pages, not private emails. I will post your email here:

I am perplexed. Reference 1 in the current article on John Herbert Rees does not support the name provided as his birth name. I have his birth certificate ( a paper copy) with his actual name, his parents' names, his place of birth. How can I enter it - it is not available electronically, just as a paper copy. He was married to Anthea Hendrickson - I have the wedding and divorce certificates. He was never married to Sheila Louise O'Connor. I have proof of that as well. He was British, never American, and I have the passports to prove that. I have his medals from WWII. I know that Chip B and others were paid by Liberty Lobby and Lyndon Larouche's people to continuously write extraordinary stuff about him because they were denied a lawsuit against him (seehttps://casetext.com/case/liberty-lobby-inc-v-rees-5). It has been terrible for his children and grandchildren - but he has not been able to change the text, and I have not been able to help him do so. Yet allegations based on a single part of his life (1970s/80s), magnified and twisted perdure. What should I do???

Please read the links above about original research and reliable sources. Articles must only summarize information previously published, so you cannot add anything you can't cite to an acceptable published source. If there is information in the article currently that is uncited, you can tag it with {{citation needed}} or even remove it entirely (just don't add different info without providing reliable published sources). If there are other problems, they can be marked with {{failed verification}} - when the article doesn't reflect what is actually in a source. The whole article can be tagged with {{disputed}}. Discussing here may attract the attention of other interested editors. MB 03:23, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the discussion of issues in the article should take place on the talk page of the article, not here - your personal talk page. MB 03:26, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]