User talk:KTRaymann

Hello! Thanks for bringing your class online, we can always use new scientific minds! It looks like you're assigning topic that we already have on Wikipedia, like aposymbiosis. That's great, as we can always expand those articles. Student shouldn't be marking those articles as ready for review, though, as they'll all fail the Articles for creation process, on the simple merit of articles already existing. They should be either copy-pasting in their new content to the existing article, or simply editing the existing article. Does that make sense? Feel free to {{ping|zanimum}} to get my attention, if you need a reply. -- Zanimum (talk) 23:45, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aposymbiosis (October 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gpkp was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aposymbiosis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Aposymbiosis, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gpkp [u • t • c] 18:21, 21 October 2020 (UTC)