User talk:Jweandpwa

Adding blatantly untrue unsourced information

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Colin Cassady. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. starship.paint ~ regal 06:07, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

Warning 2

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Yoshi Tatsu. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. InFlamester20 (talk) 20:18, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Warning 3

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Zack Ryder. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. InFlamester20 (talk) 20:23, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Recent edit to Big Gold Belt

Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. While the content of your edit may be true, I have removed it because its depth or nature of detail are not consistent with our objectives as an encyclopedia. I recognize that your edit was made in good faith and hope you will familiarize yourself with what Wikipedia is not so we may collaborate in the future. Thank you! Epic Failure (talk) 12:46, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

October 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Physical attractiveness has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Physical attractiveness was changed by Jweandpwa (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.968049 on 2015-10-13T20:25:02+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:25, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Luis de Moscoso Alvarado. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Widr (talk) 20:29, 13 October 2015 (UTC)