User talk:Juanan412

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Juanan412, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! SwisterTwister talk 05:54, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion on Records and statistics of the Rugby World Cup to Remove Some Statistical Tables[edit]

You have been contacted as you have contributed edits to the Records and statistics of the Rugby World Cup article. There is currently a discussion on the Records and statistics of the Rugby World Cup talk related to the removal of some statistical tables. The discusssion can be accessed here. Your input is most welcome and, of course, the consensus of the community will be abided by. 79.154.65.115 (talk) 13:53, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024[edit]

Hi, you are doing a great job on many of football articles, thank you for your efforts. --Mishary94 (talk) 13:45, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'll try my best. You also do a huge effort. Juanan412 (talk) 18:06, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have the following statement but I don't remember where it comes from and I can't find Cruyff's goal either, could yo help me?: Tjaronn Chery (now of QPR) scored after just nine seconds in the match between Roda JC and ADO Den Haag in the Dutch Eredivisie on 16 October 2011, Chery is now joint second in the ‘Fastest Ever Eredivisie Goal’ stakes, level with Johan Cruyff and Romeo Forests on 9 seconds – with ex-NAC Breda midfielder Koos Waslander still a whole second faster in first-place by way of his 8-second goal against PEC Zwolle in 1982. Juanan412 (talk) 18:16, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This information may be useful to you: [1] [2] --Mishary94 (talk) 23:47, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Djalma Santos[edit]

Hello! Djalma Santos used to be in the past on the list of footballers with at least 1,000 official matches, but he was removed because at least 1,000 official matches cannot be verified. See discussion here: User talk:Lorry Gundersen/Archive 1#Djalma Santos++ and here: User talk:Bakermannn#Djalma Santos++. Kind regards, Lorry Gundersen (talk) 17:16, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I wasn't aware but I've found this link where it is said that Santos played 1045 games (https://iffhs.com/posts/455). Nevertheless, in the latest update he doesn't appear (https://www.iffhs.com/posts/3680). Should we include him in this list or not? Kind regards! Juanan412 (talk) 17:52, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! As a total it appears to be over 1,000, but the important thing for his exclusion is that it's not verified by Brazilian sites that give details about the matches/which matches and where they were played, where the over 1,000 is if friendlies are included (I don't mean the official clubs', i.e. of clubs where he played, sites that have him over 1,000 as a total and no details, because in Brazil things are a bit different; there is no separation of friendlies and official, like it is in the other countries when they mention totals). Personally, I wouldn't separate friendlies before 1975 and would include players like Djalma Santos and Pelé on the list, but that's only my point of view and, most importantly, something that other WP football editors don't agree with. Anyway, Djalma Santos' 1,000 official matches is not backed up by detailed stats, hence it's not included anymore. P.S. IFFHS is used because FIFA draws stats from IFFHS (mainly) and RSSSF, but I wouldn't trust it so much/it needs caution when used, mainly since the time it got Arab-owned, as since then it has been noticed to be CR7-subjective, e.g. in their previous publication Fábio had 1,192 matches (https://iffhs.com/posts/3147), and now, 8 months later, where he kept playing, his total is reduced to 1,182, but they don't give any explanation of why they removed so many matches (by the way, their previous relevant publication didn't even include him: https://www.iffhs.com/index.php/posts/1680), but, even though not infallible or totally impartial, it is a major statistics DB anyway and for that, apart from being used from FIFA, it is used. Another example is this: https://iffhs.com/posts/2670 where they deem as top-level only Paulista and Carioca championships while not other Brazilian regional A leagues (for example, why Paranaense A is not top-level?), which is arbitrary in my humble opinion and makes no sense, at least without explanation. Kind regards, Lorry Gundersen (talk) 18:24, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for all this information. I wasn't aware of all this stuff. I don't consider major changes should be done, so everything is ok how it is. Thanks again! Juanan412 (talk) 19:17, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]