User talk:Jrbot22

March 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Sasha Grey has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. decltype 02:19, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Use the discussion page and get consensus. This edit of yours is basically vandalism since you also remove interwiki's, categories and text which is reliably sourced. Garion96 (talk) 19:23, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Sasha Grey. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. -MBK₀₀₄ 19:30, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:GulyanicsCard1951.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:GulyanicsCard1951.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:33, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:George Gulyanics.jpeg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:George Gulyanics.jpeg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:05, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lincoln Square Institute[edit]

The article Lincoln Square Institute has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The article does not establish the notability of the organization, there are no independent sources cited, the external link to the organization's website is dead, and the article appears to be nothing more than an advertisement for a report the organization released in 2008. This article has been tagged for these issues since 2009/2010 with no significant improvements since then.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –Mabeenot (talk) 23:27, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]