User talk:Jon138

HeartattaCk[edit]

Would you be able to lend a hand on either contributing reliable sources for this article or providing your opinion on the corresponding AfD? PT ^(s-s-s-s) 00:30, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Death grunt[edit]

I saw your move of the death grunt article to growled vocals. Don't make sure harsh changes without reaching any consensus on the talk page. Spearhead 22:22, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RAMBO[edit]

Hey, I saw you edited the R.A.M.B.O. page quite a bit, they're up for deletion so I thought you might be interested in making sure that doesn't happen! Thanks! Sokeripupu 20:43, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Repost of Crossover thrash[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Crossover thrash, by Leon Sword, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Crossover thrash was previously deleted as a result of an articles for deletion (or another XfD)

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Crossover thrash, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Crossover thrash itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 03:45, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD Nomination: List of deathgrind bands[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but all Wikipedia articles must meet our criteria for inclusion (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Since it does not seem that List of deathgrind bands meets these criteria, an editor has started a discussion about whether this article should be kept or deleted.

Your opinion on whether this article meets the inclusion criteria is welcome. Please contribute to the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of deathgrind bands. Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them.

Discussions such as these usually last five days. In the meantime, you are free to edit the content of the article. Please do not remove the "articles for deletion" template (the box at the top). When the discussion has concluded, a neutral third party will consider all comments and decide whether or not to delete the article. -- Jreferee ^(Talk) 03:06, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cock and Ball Torture[edit]

A tag has been placed on Cock and Ball Torture, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- The Fat Man Who Never Came Back 23:54, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

American hardcore punk groups[edit]

Hi there, I have re-categorised a number of articles into Category:American hardcore punk musical groups, as this was a pre-existing category, and thus Category:American hardcore punk groups was not needed. Cheers Nouse4aname (talk) 16:34, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is someone asking, "is that an American hardcore punk protest group or an American hardcore punk musical group?" Jon138 (talk) 05:25, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You've lost me. There were two categories for hardcore musical groups, so I put all those in the recently created cat into the older one, as there is no point having 2 separate categories. The older one follows similar naming conventions to most other American musical group sub cats. Nouse4aname (talk) 09:03, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"American hardcore punk musical groups" does not follow naming conventions for punk rock (e.g., Category:American punk rock groups) or hardcore punk categories (e.g., Category:Brazilian hardcore punk groups). And is "musical" necessary? We all know "hardcore punk groups" are "hardcore punk musical groups." Jon138 (talk) 19:34, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, there are some that do not follow the same naming. However, inclusion of "musical" seems to have been previously decided upon, with those that do not use it likely to be converted in future....Nouse4aname (talk) 19:02, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last Days of Humanity[edit]

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Last Days of Humanity, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 04:00, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Deathgrind groups[edit]

AfD nomination of Dr. Shrinker (band)[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Dr. Shrinker (band), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr. Shrinker (band). Thank you. Drmies (talk) 05:36, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Deathgrind[edit]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Deathgrind. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deathgrind. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:09, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Razorback Records albums[edit]

Category:Razorback Records albums, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 16:36, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Jon138. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Justice League (band) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Justice League (band) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justice League (band) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Lennart97 (talk) 09:09, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]