User talk:Jkoka276

This is Jkoka276's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lynda Soderholm has been accepted[edit]

Lynda Soderholm, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

PATH SLOPU 09:25, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Jeffrey Elam has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jeffrey Elam. Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 04:32, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@DGG: I've made all the edits you directed for Draft:Jeffrey Elam Jkoka276 (talk) 21:33, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

quesions about coi, etc.[edit]

Questions[edit]

COI[edit]

As reviewing administrator, I'd like to know which company you're talking about. Is it http://www.globalempire.com/ with headquarters in Toronto? I thought they ran call centers and published corporate magazines. I see from their web site that the call center division also does social media, and the magzine division also does writing, so either is I suppose possible. .

@DGG:The company is https://globalempirellc.com/ 14:08, 6 December 2019 (UTC)Jkoka276 (talk) 21:24, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please also declare what other WP contribution have been written by your company. It's not strictly required, because people contribute as individuals, but otherwise we are likely to think that other articles written about people from Argonne might be written by your firm, and thus that such articles without a declaration of COI are Undeclared Paid COI. We don't immediately delete articles with UPCOI, but we examine them quite skeptically DGG ( talk ) 04:35, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@DGG:I have added these declarations to each pageJkoka276 (talk) 21:24, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

good, now adjust all of this to indicate just what company it is. You also need to say if the transaction has been mediated by an agent of any sort, such as advertising for an article, or for business, on a web site of exchange. If it has, you must specifically sayso. DGG ( talk ) 02:42, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Soderholm[edit]

I made some revisions, and commented on that talk page. the key problem is the lack of reference for the facts of her career. You also nneed to concentrate on writing in a style suitable to an encycopedia, not a press release--see my comments there, and my comments of Draft:Jeffrey Elam. DGG ( talk ) 04:35, 27 October 2019 (UTC)`[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Larry Curtiss (October 27)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SamHolt6 was:

Declining pending proper COI/Paid disclosure; see User_talk:Jkoka276#Questions. In addition, the bibliography and list of works publish should be supported with references.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Larry Curtiss and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Larry Curtiss, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SamHolt6 (talk) 22:53, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jkoka276! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SamHolt6 (talk) 22:53, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Jeffrey Elam has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jeffrey Elam. Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 02:25, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Larry Curtiss (January 6)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

You need to eliminate subjective statements of importance, and concentrateo n the important material.

1. Being an elected fellow of AAAS is a high honor, but being on the editorial board of a journal is a routine accomplishment.

2. Being listed as a" highly cited chemist" is less meaningful than listing his most cited publications and the number of citations he has received.

3/" Known for" is relatively meaningless and unprovable. You can say something like "specialist in" because that is demonstratedby his publications.

4. Somilarly: "multiple patents"

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Larry Curtiss and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Larry Curtiss, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 02:30, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Paul Fenter has been accepted[edit]

Paul Fenter, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sulfurboy (talk) 18:31, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Larry Curtiss has been accepted[edit]

Larry Curtiss, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 18:11, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Michael Wang (scientist) has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Michael Wang (scientist). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 20:30, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael Wang (scientist) (May 11)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Squeeps10 was: undefined The comment the reviewer left was: Creator appears to have a conflict of interest with the article's subject.
Squeeps10 ^{Talk to me}_{My edits} 20:47, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rejection undone. Please feel free to improve the draft, and resubmit if you feel that concerns have been addressed. Happy editing! Eumat114 formerly TLOM (Message) 02:52, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Khalil Amine[edit]

Khalil Amine, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

1292simon (talk) 22:42, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Linda Young (Scientist) moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Linda Young (Scientist), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Polyamorph (talk) 10:47, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jeffrey Elam has been accepted[edit]

Jeffrey Elam, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 08:41, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dileep Singh (scientist) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dileep Singh (scientist), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

1292simon (talk) 22:34, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael Wang (scientist) has been accepted[edit]

Michael Wang (scientist), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Alpha3031 (t • c) 04:13, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Seth Darling moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Seth Darling, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Loksmythe (talk) 18:14, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dileep Singh (scientist) (August 8)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for academics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This reads like a resume / CV.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dileep Singh (scientist) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dileep Singh (scientist), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 01:25, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Seth Darling (September 3)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Reads more like a glowing resume than a Wikipedia article. Please remove the hyperlinks in the body as well prior to submission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Seth Darling and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Seth Darling, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 05:45, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dileep Singh (scientist) (November 3)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Snowycats was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dileep Singh (scientist) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dileep Singh (scientist), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Snowycats (talk) 05:41, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Seth Darling has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Seth Darling. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 20:26, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Seth Darling has been accepted[edit]

Seth Darling, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~Kvng (talk) 22:19, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Dileep Singh (scientist)[edit]

Hello, Jkoka276. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dileep Singh (scientist), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:02, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]