User talk:JessNelson12345

This is JessNelson12345's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Torpoint Town Council (December 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Torpoint. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

A single source, once cited, isn't enough to establish notability per WP:GNG. This could be merged into the existing article on the town itself.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Torpoint Town Council and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 19:54, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JessNelson12345! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 19:54, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Celtic flags for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Celtic flags is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celtic flags until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 12:45, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this edit to Celtic flags, you removed Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:48, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Celtic flags. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Fram (talk) 12:50, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at HMS Raleigh (shore establishment), you may be blocked from editing. David Biddulph (talk) 15:44, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

wasnt a vandalize it was the truth its not english its cornish JessNelson12345 (talk) 03:23, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Kernow. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 18:05, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mate Kernow is a celtic nation JessNelson12345 (talk) 16:49, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Torpoint Town Council

Hello, JessNelson12345. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Torpoint Town Council, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:06, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 06:54, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges – persistently making biased edits concerning Cornwall, despite several warnings to stop.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —Small jim 18:29, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]