User talk:Jebblz
Welcome Jebblz!
| Some pages of helpful information to get you started: | Some common sense Dos and Don'ts:
|
| If you need further help, you can: | or you can: | or even: |
Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page, and someone will try to help.
There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
|
|
Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the 
button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.
To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can create your own private sandbox for use any time. Perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put
{{My sandbox}} on your userpage.Sincerely, w.carter-Talk 15:27, 6 August 2015 (UTC) (Leave me a message)
Jebblz, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]
|
Hi Jebblz! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Lightbreather (I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:20, 4 August 2015 (UTC) |
A belated Welcome![edit]
Oh dear, I see that no one have taken the time to give you a proper welcome. Our bad! Above are some more helpful links for editing and getting around the Wikipedia. You are also always welcome to ask anything at my talk page. I am one of the many editors here who help newcomers. Btw, your article is coming along just fine! 
Cheers, w.carter-Talk 15:27, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure![edit]
- Hi Jebblz! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 09:27, Wednesday, August 12, 2015 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Your submission at Articles for creation: Walter Baets has been accepted[edit]
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 16:51, 18 August 2015 (UTC)Undisclosed paid editing: Walter Baets by User:Jebblz[edit]
This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Jcb (talk) 17:02, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
Managing a conflict of interest[edit]
Hello, Jebblz. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Walter Baets, you may have a conflict of interest. People with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, see the conflict of interest guideline and frequently asked questions for organizations. In particular, please:
- avoid editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, its competitors, or projects and products you or they are involved with;
- instead, propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the
{{request edit}}template); - avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
- exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing, and autobiographies. OTRS correspondence indicates an undisclosed conflict of interest, which violates Wikipedia's terms of service. Miniapolis 23:02, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
conflict of interest[edit]
Dear Editors,
Thank you all for the positive feedback and guidance with regard to conflict of interest posting. It was an issue I was not aware of in the slightest and did not come across it anyway in the various training modules that i went through here. I'm sure it exists somewhere, but I didn't see it.
I assure you that the article I uploaded was accurate and relevant and in no way influenced by the fact that I was commissioned to do it. The subject involved simply didn't have the time or energy to learn how wikipedia works.
Shall not happen again though, now that I know this policy!
Regards Jebblz Jebblz (talk) 10:50, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
- The conflict of interest, undisclosed until now, is not the only problem. As an encyclopedia (rather than a directory), Wikipedia has a specific notability guideline for academics. Please see Wikipedia:Search engine optimization for what is (and is not) appropriate here. All the best, Miniapolis 21:12, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
Thank you Miniapolis for pointing me towards the academics notability page. I do believe the head of the Graduate School of Business qualifies under these criteria. My question to you is, will the School themselves be permitted to load a page on their head, as it wont be paid work and merely an acknowledgement of his academic achievements. Don't want him blocked from Wikipedia completely, merely because I didn't understand the rules clearly enough. Jebblz (talk) 08:45, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
Greetings again, in particular to Miniapolis I haven't heard anything back again and was really anxious to resolve this conflict. May I reload the page of Walter Baets if I register that there was previously compensation for uploading him as the academic head of the Graduate School of Business? Or may I inform the School of Business themselves that they should be the ones to add their academics to Wikipedia? Would very much like to resolve this successfully for all concerned.