Jump to content

User talk:Jax 0677/Archive 13

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 10Archive 11Archive 12Archive 13Archive 14Archive 15→Archive 20

'Biopics' category of the Carter Family box

Jax,

What is your rationale for removing the "The Carter Family: Will the Circle Be Unbroken" documentary plus the two musicals "Keep on the Sunny Side" and "Wildwood Flower: The June Carter Story" from the 'Biopics' category of the Carter Family box? The documentary is currently available for sale and the first musical is currently traveling to different venues.

Denise B-K (talk) 15:59, 4 November 2015 (UTC)Denisebk

Thanks for the redirects

Thank you for adding all those redirects to Shooting of Jeremy Mardis. And that's a clever method of creating numerous redirects to he same article! I'll have to remember that for the next time I'm doing multiple redirects to one article. Thanks again and happy editing. —GrammarFascist contribstalk 05:33, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Virginia Tech Project Invite

As a current or past contributor to a related article, I thought I'd let you know about WikiProject Virginia Tech, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Virginia Tech. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks and related articles. Thanks!

Go Hokies (talk) 22:41, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

November 2015

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Dan Johnson (musician). When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. You clearly do not understand what the templates you removed signify or what WP:V and WP:RS says. The images are not enough to signify the content and the user comment in the Facebook post are not enough. I am willing to take it to WP:RSN to determine if I'm right or you are. Feel free to remove it again to have me take it to a wider audience or you can take it there directly. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:43, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

  • Reply - @Walter Görlitz: per your request, I will leave the tags as they are, for now. That being said, with the photographs on the sites, and the fact that the shows have already taken place, perhaps the section can be revised to state that "In late 2015, Johnson performed percussion in multiple shows with Seasons After". --Jax 0677 (talk) 19:00, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Technical Barnstar
This is in recognition of your significant contributions to Wikipedia over the years and to commend you for your constant efforts which have made Wikipedia a better place. Garagepunk66 (talk) 04:10, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Blizzard in Colorado

Thanks for your addition here! However, it certainly doesn't belong in the Seasonal forecasts section. If you think it is significant enough, you can help out with the article by adding a new section. You can see 2014–15 North American winter for ideas regarding the section layout. Thanks again! Dustin (talk) 02:16, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Ways to improve Always and Forever (Alien Ant Farm album)

Hi, I'm Chris troutman. Jax 0677, thanks for creating Always and Forever (Alien Ant Farm album)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Creating articles comes with the responsibility to include sources. Please read WP:CITE!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Chris Troutman (talk) 20:48, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Robert Lewis Dear

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Robert Lewis Dear requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 02:49, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Robert Lewis Dear for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robert Lewis Dear is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Lewis Dear until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 03:26, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Garrett Swasey for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Garrett Swasey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Garrett Swasey until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 17:30, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Talk:People Like Us (film)

I invite you to second RM discussion. --George Ho (talk) 06:29, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Thank You

Thanks for the support MrRayshon (talk)

Replaceable fair use File:Garrett Swasey.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Garrett Swasey.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. WWGB (talk) 02:18, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Loren Wade listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Loren Wade. Since you had some involvement with the Loren Wade redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 22:36, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of 2015 Los Angeles Unified School District closure for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2015 Los Angeles Unified School District closure is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2015 Los Angeles Unified School District closure until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mrfrobinson (talk) 23:02, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015 in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Closure. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of China at the 2010 Asian Games (A-B)

The article China at the 2010 Asian Games (A-B) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This page is an orphan, a failed and abandoned split attempt. All content on this page is redundant to content at China_at_the_2010_Asian_Games. (I copied Aquatics back to the original article.)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Alsee (talk) 09:27, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

December 2015

Information icon Thank you for your suggestion regarding Ethan Couch. When you believe an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the edit this page link at the top.
The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to). I've noticed that you have added the {{lr}} tag to the page three times, when all it took was twenty seconds with reFill to fix it (I fixed two of them). I understand if you don't have time (I sometimes just tag if i'm in a rush) but whenever you can, fix it. Thanks. WikiWisePowder (talk) 19:07, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

2015 LUSD Closure

I requested the article be copied onto my sandbox at User:Trackinfo/sandbox. Feel free to glean anything from it to post into the LAUSD article, as I will possibly do if I get motivated. We both know the AfD hit during Christmas vacation, when no further developments will happen until people return to their desks in about a week. When they figure some things out, investigate Cortines' decision or arrest somebody, it might get page 4 in the paper, but it will give us a reason to appeal and make this a stand alone article. Trackinfo (talk) 06:12, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

2015 flood listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 2015 flood. Since you had some involvement with the 2015 flood redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so.  ‑ Iridescent 21:11, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Raheem DeVaughn discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crash & Burn. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Redirects and page moves

Jax, what was with this? Were you moving the page to various titles just to create redirects? Please don't do that; it's not always easy to track down page history even when a page moves a few times. Some of these terms were highly ambiguous too. I've retargeted Francisco sanchez and Juan lopez to existing dabs. --BDD (talk) 19:06, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Samsung Galaxy S7 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Samsung Galaxy S7 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samsung Galaxy S7 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (talk) 17:02, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

2014 & 2015 in heavy metal music

What's your problem with hostile edit summaries? For example, If Death Angel and Biohazard (band) cannot be listed in this 2015 section, then neither can anyone else, as they didn't release 2015 album). Death Angel were moved to 2016, because they give news about their album writing process and they confirmed it will be released in 2016. And Biohazard were never added to the 2015 article. So what's your problem? One more thing – Amazon and iTunes aren't reliable sources. So don't add content with whatever sources you find. You should learn how to correctly add content to the table and sources, because whenever you add something, me and other editors have to correct information and fix everything that you add. P.S. if you're going to reply then do it here and NOT on my talk page. – Sabbatino (talk) 11:16, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

  • Reply - @Sabbatino:, there is no music album out there which has a prime direction of being released in 2014 nor 2015. My additions of Death Angel and Biohazard to 2015 in metal were removed, because there was no plan to release those two albums that year. This is why the section should be removed at the end of a given year. --Jax 0677 (talk) 18:38, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Michael Galeota.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Michael Galeota.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{Non-free fair use}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. George Ho (talk) 20:20, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Michael Galeota.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Michael Galeota.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. George Ho (talk) 06:25, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Michael Galeota 002.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Michael Galeota 002.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. This is George Ho actually (Talk) 22:32, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Occupation of MNWR

Hi Thanks for walking back archiving to 5d. Yesterday I moved it to 7 from 8, but nothing has been auto archiving. I've never understood those templates, but I think the system is broken. If you know how to make 'em go, could you look into it please? Archiving would sure help manage the talk page if we can wake it up so it works. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 18:28, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Category redirects

Per WP:R#CATEGORY, do not create inter-category redirects, by adding a line #REDIRECT Category:target category to a category page as you continue to do. Articles added to a "redirected" category do not show up in the target category, preventing proper categorization. What's worse, since redirected categories do not become "red links", editors won't be aware even when they add an article to a redirected category. Please use "soft" redirects instead. They are created by placing {{Category redirect}} in the category page. See Wikipedia:Categories for discussion#Redirecting categories.

Also, WP:CHEAP does not apply to category redirects as the redirects are not maintained in the same manner. While misspellings of an article may be helpful to take one immediately to the correct article, misspellings of categories only tend to clutter a system in which both bots and volunteers must watch out for and correct. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 17:25, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

You are creating more work for everyone by placing templates into category redirects rather than their proper categories. As opposed to article redirects, which will take you to the correct article regardless, items put into a redirected category don't automatically get placed into the proper category. You will find these in Category:Wikipedia non-empty soft redirected categories. Also, unlike articles, one cannot add categories to templates using HotCat, therefore adding categories has to be done manually. If one is placed in the wrong category, it won't be fixed automatically like an article when using HotCat. While bots do eventually take care of miscategorization into a category redirect, it often takes weeks, leaving volunteers to do the work by going into the aforementioned category to ensure articles, templates, etc. are not sitting in an incorrect category for too long. Category redirects are for those who might inadvertently place something into a wrong category; no one should place articles, templates, or anything else in the wrong category on purpose as it is detrimental to other editors who monitor such things. So please, when putting templates into categories, such as Category:British musician templates, please check that it's not going into a inappropriate category so more work isn't created for others. Category redirects are NOT the same thing as article redirects and more care needs to be taken when using them. Thank you. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 23:46, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Westlake High School (Texas)

WP:BLP1E tells us not to make articles about people known for one event, WP:BLPCRIME tells us not to discuss by name non notable people accused of crimes. WP:NOTNEWS tells us not to discuss ongoing events unless there is widespread ongoing coverage. School article guidelines tell us not to name non notable staff or students and also not to discuss subjects that are primarily of interest to the local population. As one of the coordinators of the school project on Wikipedia I watch thousands of school articles. I can tell you that a story like this arises a couple times a month. Sadly, stories regarding student/staff affairs have become rather commonplace. I doubt this is of much interest outside Austin. Sad, but true. Please do not replace this bit without consensus, which of course you are welcome to seek at the article's talk page. Thanks. John from Idegon (talk) 17:21, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Page moves

You really shouldn't do moves such as this. There is actual page history for an article for Angelic Encounters which is now being inappropriately attributed to Undead. Unholy. Divine.. As mentioned on your talk page before, moving pages just to create different redirects is a bad idea. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 01:07, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

I'm specifically referring to Angelic Encounters, which is not new because it was created in October 2006 and not changed to a redirect until November 2010. That entire history is now incorrectly attributed to Undead. Unholy. Divine. That should be fixed. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 15:06, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

You did it again. You moved a redirect with a long history to something new that has nothing to do with the original article. Now DP discography is now showing the history for Pieces of Nothing (Drowning Pool EP), which has a history dating back five years ago. I thought you were just going to do such redirecting of redirects with only NEW articles. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 04:10, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Samsung galaxy s7

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Samsung galaxy s7, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Izno (talk) 19:14, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 2016 North American cold wave

The article 2016 North American cold wave has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

New England is not North America. Western U.S. and Canada have been unseasonably warm. A few days in February is not all of 2016. Windchill does not necessarily equate cold temperatures. Windchill is based on WIND and temperature. A couple day, localized event like this doesn't need a page.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bgwhite (talk) 08:17, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Bare URLs

Please use proper citation formats. Bare URLs are subject to link rot and without full citation details, the verifability is harmed. ViperSnake151  Talk  16:06, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

2016 North American cold wave

Are you planning on significantly expanding this article? If not, I would recommend merging it to 2015–16 North American winter, as has been done with the section on "Late December warmth". Regards, Jolly Ω Janner 20:18, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Based on the lack of expansion, I have merged it with 2015–16 North American winter. Please continue working on the article there and request a second opinion before considering splitting it off as its own article. I have left the old article as a redirect, so all the revision histories are still accessible. Regards, Jolly Ω Janner 21:21, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Army of Anyone image

Hi there. Thanks for the image - the article doesn't get much attention from anyone outside of me. But I wanted to double check - are you sure this is a picture of Army of Anyone though? The logo on the drum set really looks like its part of the FILTER logo that Filter (band) uses (Richard Patrick's other band, of course.) Also...I'm not sure that the drummer in the picture looks like most of the pictures I've seen of Ray Luzier, AoA's only drummer...

Anyways, wanted to double check with you and see if you had any more insight on this. Let me know. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 20:21, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Chuck Wicks

It would be more conducive to remove the words "to be released" yourself than to tag the article as outdated. Eric444 (talk) 04:50, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Tagging

Just a recommendation before you go tagging an article for no lead, check it hasn't been removed in vandalism recently ;) EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 04:07, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Friends Day listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Friends Day. Since you had some involvement with the Friends Day redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. JZCL 20:01, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2016 United States Elizabethkingia outbreak, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Event and Investigation. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rocky Allen (technician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Work. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Kate Hanni redirect

Hi! The redirect you've created at Kate Hanni isn't useful. The destination page doesn't even mention her once, so anyone who would find the redirect would only be confused. And even if the page did mention her, they're not exactly tightly related subjects. Thus I think it's better deleted. -- intgr [talk] 23:52, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

  • Reply - I respectfully disagree, as she is the person who started and founded the entire organization in the first place. --Jax 0677 (talk) 13:15, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
    • Thanks, it's better now that the page lists Hanni as the founder. After reading the travelweekly source, it does indeed seem that she is very deeply involved and it's clear to me now that the redirect is justified. Sorry that I didn't investigate this in depth first. Though it would be good to have a paragraph or two in the article about her involvement. -- intgr [[user talk:|[talk]]] 13:36, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
  • Reply - @Intgr:, thank you for your reply, I appreciate your feedback. This is Wikipedia, so if you feel that there should be a longer article, you are more than welcome to start one. --Jax 0677 (talk) 17:22, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Rocky Allen (technician) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rocky Allen (technician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rocky Allen (technician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. duffbeerforme (talk) 04:16, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Craig Strickland, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Sleet and Swam. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Poor band images

I really dont think some of these images you're are very representative of the band. First off, they really should be of most or all members, not just one person. Beyond that though, the file names on some indicate that they are of the person performing their instrument over a decade after they left the band. Is them playing with a different band a decade after the left the band really representative enough for a band article? Sergecross73 msg me 21:47, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

April 2016

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove the maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to. duffbeerforme (talk) 10:31, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Marcus Toji

The article Marcus Toji has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable actor who only has had minor acting roles

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Liz Read! Talk! 17:21, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

I don't think his notability is evident in his article. You can work on establishing this but I might bring it to AfD. Liz Read! Talk! 18:09, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Recreation of page Vietnamese Community at the National University of Singapore

Hi, I see that you recreated a page Vietnamese Community at the National University of Singapore and added a redirect to National University of Singapore. The page was an unofficial student club with no citations and was deleted per an AfD. I have tagged the page for speedy deletion. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 01:12, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Vietnamese Community at the National University of Singapore

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Vietnamese Community at the National University of Singapore, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Lemongirl942 (talk) 01:13, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

West One Music Group

Hi,

I work for West One Music Group for which you created a Wikipedia page.

There are some incorrect details on that page, including the name of the company, which I'm unable to amend. Are you able to shcnage the name of the page from West One Music to West One Music Group - this is an important brand standard of ours. If you are unable to amend, I have requested the page be reviewed for deletion and we will create an accurate page from scratch.

Thanks, Jamie Clarke West One Music Group — Preceding unsigned comment added by JamieWOMG15 (talk • contribs) 14:13, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

@JamieWOMG15: In response to "we will create an accurate page from scratch", please don't, see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. If something is not accurate, the article's talk page (e.g. Talk:West One Music Group) is the most appropriate place to suggest edits. -- intgr [talk] 14:54, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of West One Music Group for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article West One Music Group is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/West One Music Group until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. NottNott talk|contrib 15:56, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for your help. West One Music's page shouldn't be merged with Takeshi - he is a composer independent of West One Music Group - he happens to compose music that we release occasionally. He is head of the Noise Refinery label. All we want is to be represented properly, as you've seen our US expansion is huge news for us and we want that to be reflected on the page JamieWOMG15 (talk) 09:53, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lo Lamento

The article Lo Lamento has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable single

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:59, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Just wish to say

That I agree with your comments entirely on the discussion about whether the article on Reactions to the Death of Prince should be deleted. There is already an article called Death of Prince so this could be merged with this article - which might save readers time as they would not have to click on as many wikilinks.Vorbee (talk) 18:43, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

CN

Please be sure to look at the references following content before marking them with a cn tag. As far as Lyne's middle name, it is in the attached reference in the article lede. Additionally, when you do appropriately place cn tags, please do it in the right location. Thanks, WV ● ✉ ✓ 22:24, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

  • Reply - @Winkelvi:, I looked in the references for "Maree", and did not find that name. Finally, a suitable reference was added for her name. Also, when you post on someone's talk page, add a link to the article so that the person knows to which page you are referring. --Jax 0677 (talk) 22:32, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Sorry you were confused, however, I thought the reference in my comment to "Lyne" would be obvious in regard to the article in question. Besides, you had just put the cn tag there, so I didn't think being overly specific was necessary. Further, the middle name is in the NBC ref cited and attached to the name in the lede. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 22:37, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Jake Miller discography

Nonsense--on both counts. There is no reasonable ground for a separate discography, and your inclusion of YouTube links is silly. We're not a directory for such links, and you don't need those to prove that they exist. Nor does a discography list a whole bunch of videos; we're not a fansite. Drmies (talk) 03:45, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Los Angeles Police Protective League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Residents. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:06, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

As Cities Burn EPs

User:Jax 0677/As Cities Burn EP (2002) and User:Jax 0677/As Cities Burn EP (2003) were moved by someone else to As Cities Burn EP (2002) and As Cities Burn EP (2003) respectively, then nominated for deletion by another user at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/As Cities Burn EP (2002) (2nd nomination), and subsequently deleted. This was all done even though you're an active user (which is not in accordance with the WP:STALEDRAFT guideline alluded to in the move summary), and without any notice to you that I could find with a quick glance. Anyhow, I had the pages re-userfied back to their former location in your userspace (User talk:Malcolmxl5#As Cities Burn EP (2002) and As Cities Burn EP (2003)). Best Regards,—Godsy(TALKCONT) 09:23, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Hey there, the two pages have been moved out of your userspace again. Are you content with that? --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:16, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of fires
added a link pointing to Spring Branch
Spring Branch, Houston
added a link pointing to Spring Branch

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:22, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jax_0677/Archive_13&oldid=1136177137"