User talk:Jaredkunz30

Hi

Welcome to Wikipedia. I saw your post at ANI and thought I'd drop you a line. I'm not an administrator, but if you have any questions or need any help, you can get hold of me by replying here and letting me know by putting {{tb|Jaredkunz30|Hi}} on my talk page. Happy editing, HJ Mitchell | fancy a chat? 00:03, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much.Jaredkunz30 (talk) 02:34, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

It has been established that you engaged in sockpuppetry by evidence presented here:
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jaredkunz30, and you are therefore blocked indefinitely.
If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Cailil ^talk 18:33, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jaredkunz30 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand why I was blocked. I made light of Wikipedia's policies. I should not have done that. I feel bad about what I did. Even if I did not fully understand the sock puppet policy, I should have been more humble and I should not have been writing rude and careless things. I understand why I people are upset with me. A few people tried to help me, but I was being pig headed. I really enjoy reading wikipedia articles and I would really like to contribute to them. I don't see all of my edits as controversial, but I have learned that I should edit more than one or two articles so that I can add quality to this website. I sincerely apologize and I will accept whatever decision is made. Life will go on as I have learned some valuable lessons in civility and neutrality in my short time editing and interacting with people out here. I wish you all the best. Thanks,

Decline reason:

I do not think that you do actually understand why you were blocked. You created multiple WP:SOCKPUPPETs. You threatened to created more. Yes, your previous interactions have been far from community-minded, but direct statements that you were happy to break a core policy again and again is concerning and disruptive - making your way to WP:ANI is never a good thing. What we need to understand more not only that you understand civility and cooperation, but that you understand WP:SOCK and why so many editors are concerned (and spent a lot of time) dealing with it. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:38, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Response to the decline reason by BWilkins

Here is my response to the Decline reason given by BWilkins. Ok, you have shared your two cents. When/if there is a checkuser performed, honest people will clearly see that my IP is in no way related to those other people. Believe it or not, there are a number of real people out there who believe articles like the BOM archaeology are extremely biased against the books historicity. I think it is very unfortunate that all these people are being called sock puppets based on a few people's suspicions. If the checkuser request is fulfilled, then the truth will be known. I said some careless things, I feel bad about it. I am hopeful there is forgiveness in the WP community. I believe there is. WP is a good community. I am optimistic. Even if the checkuser is not performed, I will still think positively of this place. Maybe someday there will be further investigation that releases the block on my account. Otherwise, life goes on. Thanks,Jaredkunz30 (talk) 16:31, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jaredkunz30 one way or another after the CU is completed I will review this block if no other admin does so first. Even if the CU were to come back positive we can still open a discussion about unblocking. So either way this will be reviewed--Cailil ^talk 17:08, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Cailil. I appreciate the information. I am grateful to know that there are such helpful and kind people here on WP. I'm looking forward to the CU. Thanks,Jaredkunz30 (talk) 18:07, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

Even though I know we shouldn't really talk to sockpuppets, we're all still human beings, and we should still care for each other. I am sure you will learn from your mistakes, and if you should ever edit Wikipedia on another account, it will be to improve it!

Hello Jaredkunz30, Celestialwarden11 has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Hello, fellow Wikipedian! I am so, so happy and honored for this chance for us to talk. If you need anything, or if you simply want to chat, I am right here for you, pal! Also remember, to spread the joy! Wikipedia may not be the most cheerful place to be, but YOU can help make it more cheerful! Have a fantastic day, and God bless! ^_^

I smacked 'em as I thanked 'em

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y67fs7wZ5kM "Yes I know I'm going to hell, in a leather jacket"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=secu5S0-g2M&feature=related "he's gonna break your back, for a chance."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uS3pzed6bns&NR=1 "and you hear, what you want to hear. and you take, what you wanna take. Forgive them, even if they are not sorry. All the vultures, bootleggers at the door waiting. All this leaves you trapped in another dimension. Drop your guard, you don't have to be smarter than the time. I gotta mind full of blanks. I need to go somewhere real fast. Oh I got music, coming outta my hands and feet and kisses. Woooooo!"

I know you're stalking me mr. ian thomson...you must really be bored. I found this video of you on the web. You look so smart! http://www.unm.edu/~ithomson/

Um, no that's someone named IaIn' Thomson from the university of New Mexico. Says on my user page that my name is Ian with only one I, and that I am from South Carolina and attend USC. Ian Thomson is actually a pretty common Scottish name. As for "stalking" you: I put your talk page on my watch list the first time I had to give you a warning, it's not uncommon for users to do that. And be glad that you didn't find anything about me: Wikipedia has rules against giving out personal information about any user that the user has not already given out. Ian.thomson (talk) 13:33, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Removed talk page access

Since you aren't making any active attempt to request an unblock, and are just screwing around on your talk page, I have revoked your talk page access. Now, if you wish to be unblocked, you should contact the arbitration committee via email to review your case. Instructions for doing so are located at WP:ARBCOM. Via con dios. --Jayron32 03:33, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your email. I had already left instructions on how to be unblocked, and those instructions are immediately located above this statement. Please do that. --Jayron32 22:59, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Echoing Jayron's point. And in response to your email, please contact the WP:ARBCOM so that they can review your request for unblock--Cailil ^talk 09:28, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]