User talk:Jamesthomas101
April 2008
[edit]
Hi, the recent edit you made to Clive Betts has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. 21655 τalk/ ʃign 20:21, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Clive Betts. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. STOP If you have an issue cry about it on my talk page :) Prom3th3an (talk) 08:07, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Clive Betts, you will be blocked from editing. Roadrunnerz45 (talk) 08:18, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Clive Betts, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
- editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
- participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
- linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
- and you must always:
- avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you.
I'd suggest you have a clear conflict of interst as you describe yourself as a "close personal friend" of Mr Betts. ..