User talk:JK Cromwell

What your source for Donald Trump's wealth. I am going to revert until you provide a new source--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 22:36, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Jane Austen. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. --ROGER DAVIES ^talk 18:00, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thank you. --ROGER DAVIES ^talk 18:01, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

JK Cromwell, I must ask you to join in on the discussion at Talk:List of best-selling books before doing any further edits to the article, which are seen as increasingly unhelpful and disruptive by your fellow users. User:Dorftrottel 11:23, February 13, 2008
- I reverted. Please discuss your edit at the article talk page. User:Dorftrottel 17:09, February 13, 2008

Please stop removing information from articles, as you have to Sears Tower and Daniel Radcliffe, among others. faithless (^speak) 14:55, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Isaac Asimov and Theodore Dreiser[edit]

Can you please explain why you interchanged the images on Isaac Asimov and removed one of the pictures on Theodore Dreiser? Mkeranat (talk) 19:07, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule . Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 22:23, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Mukesh Ambani and J. K. Rowling. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. V-train (talk) 18:32, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Tim Vickers (talk) 20:12, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008[edit]

Your violation of WP:IUP and WP:FUC on Jesse Spencer has been reverted. --Yamla (talk) 19:13, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.