User talk:JCWoodberry1234

Welcome!

Hello, JCWoodberry1234!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, paul2520 💬 16:30, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Kamala Khan (Marvel Cinematic Universe), please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Surviving a genocide is not a major part of this character's biography, as the Blip was not really a defining aspect of their story. Trailblazer101 (talk) 00:50, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://marvelcinematicuniverse.fandom.com/wiki/Ms._Marvel According to this, the article here says In 2018, Khan survived the Snap. In 2020, she was awarded the Junior Aide Award for her work as a Girl Scout. This would qualify her as a fictional genocide survivor. JCWoodberry1234 (talk) 17:09, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to BioShock Infinite, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 04:49, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe it's a WP:RADAR situation, but all your edits are reverted. Please read WP:CATDEF. All those games you listed as 'set in libraries' didn't mention a library once. They're not 'set' in a library at all. Maybe a library makes an appearance, but if it's not notable enough to get a mention, it definitely shouldn't be categorised as such. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 04:58, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lego Dimensions. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. I ask you again to kindly read WP:CATDEF on categorisering. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 03:36, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to The Edge of Destruction, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please ensure you are using edit summaries to explain your changes, especially when reverting other editors. Thank you. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 00:28, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Video games set on Saturn

A tag has been placed on Category:Video games set on Saturn indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 04:55, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Beetlejuice, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. The release year of a film is not necessarily the year the film is set in. Set in year needs a separate sourced mention in the article to be added as a category. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:21, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also if the time a film is set in isn't mentioned in the film itself, it is WP:NOTDEFINING and thus not important to the story. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:58, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://beetlejuice.fandom.com/wiki/Beetlejuice_(character) According to this, Beetlejuice was summoned by Adam and Barbara in 1988, which is what happens in the film JCWoodberry1234 (talk) 17:07, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Werewolf by Night (TV special). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Trailblazer101 (talk) 14:38, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

According to this: https://marvelcinematicuniverse.fandom.com/wiki/Massacre_at_the_Bloodstone_Manor an event that takes place during the film, it is set in 2025 which is why the Werewolf by Night (TV special) would be in the category Films set in 2025 JCWoodberry1234 (talk) 17:12, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Lego Dimensions, you may be blocked from editing. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 17:00, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been repeatedly asked to follow WP:CATDEF. Also note that WP:COMMUNICATION is required. You have not responded to any message. Please stop your disruptive editing. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 17:01, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

here are the video games set by year dates I put in Lego Dimensions and why:

Video games set in the 1880s: The Level Once Upon A Time Machine in the West and 1885 Hill Valley in the Back to the Future hub world are set in 1885.
Video games set in 1984: The Ghostbusters Level Pack is based on the film which takes place in 1984.
Video games set in 1989 and Video games set in 1912: The Ghostbusters Level The Phantom Zone has a Delorean Treadmill that is set between 1989 and 1912.
Video games set in 1981 and Video games set in 2015: The Midway Arcade Level All Your Bricks Are Belong To Us has a Delorean Treadmill that is set between 1981 and 2015.
Video games set in 1985 and Video games set in 1955: The Back to the Future Level Pack is based on the film and the level takes you between 1985 and 1955.

Video games set in 2025: The Doctor Who Level Pack The Dalek Extermination of Earth takes you between 2025, 2015, and 1985.

Video games set in 2016: The Ghostbusters Story pack is based on the 2016 Ghostbusters film, set in 2016.

Video games set in the 1870s: The Ghostbusters Story pack level Paranormal Beginnings has a Delorean Treadmill that is set between 2016 and 1872.

Video games set in 1926: The Fantastic Beasts Story pack is based on the 2016 Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them film set in 1926.

Video games set in 1982: The E.T. world is based on the film, set in 1982.

Video games set in the 1990s: The Harry Potter franchise is set between 1991-1998, and the hub world is set somewhere in this time.

Video games set in 2011: In the Portal Hub World, A DeLorean Treadmill is set between E 99 9999 99 99 and 2011

Video games set in 2017: In the Lego Batman Movie hub World, A DeLorean Treadmill is set between 2017 and 2025

Video games set in Kansas: The Wizard of Oz Hub world has a section set in Kansas.

Video games set in California: The Back to the Future Hub world is set in Hill Valley, California

Video games set in Connecticut: The Beetlejuice Hub world is in Winter River, Connecticut

Video games set in the 19th century, Video games set in the 21st century, video games set in London, video games set on fictional planets, and video games set on Mars: The Doctor Who hub world has locations in 19th Century London, 21st Century London, Mars, and fiction planet Telos.

Video games set in New York City: The Ghostbusters, Ghostbusters 2016, and Gremlins hub worlds are set in New York City.

Video games set in the Las Vegas Valley: The Knight Rider Hub World is located in Las Vegas

Video games set in Prague, Video games set in Virginia, Video games set in Spain, Video games set in Sydney, Video games set in Shanghai, Video games set in Rome: These are locations in the Mission Impossible hub world.

Video Games set in Los Angeles: The A-Team Hub world is set in Los Angeles.

Video games set in Oregon: The Goonies level pack and hub world is set in Astoria JCWoodberry1234 (talk) 17:04, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:09, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What pages did I do disruptive editing to? Tell me what i did wrong and I can explain why I put those edits there. JCWoodberry1234 (talk) 16:13, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Read all of the messages on this talk page, including the links to the various guidelines and policies provided.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:32, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're still haven't read Wikipedia:Reliable sources, which has been linked numerous times. Fandom is not a reliable source.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:19, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And on top of that it is original research to make the connections that are being made, e.g. the Thanos snap was genocide. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 17:21, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I acknowledge the mistakes I made that led to my block. I regret misusing unreliable sources, adding unsupported categories, and failing to communicate properly with other editors. I now understand the importance of adhering to Wikipedia's guidelines, including WP and the disruption my edits caused.

I have reviewed the relevant policies thoroughly and am committed to constructive editing. I will ensure my edits are based on reliable sources, avoid making unsupported connections or engaging in original research, and always engage in discussions with other editors to reach consensus.

I humbly request another chance to contribute positively to Wikipedia. I will make every effort to avoid repeating my past mistakes.

Thank you for considering my appeal. JCWoodberry1234 (talk) 19:05, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

JCWoodberry1234 (talk) 12:38, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

JCWoodberry1234 (talk) 15:36, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have started communicating and I'm ready to return. JCWoodberry1234 (talk) 00:20, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

JCWoodberry1234 (talk) 18:55, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I acknowledge the mistakes I made that led to my block. I regret misusing unreliable sources, adding unsupported categories, and failing to communicate properly with other editors. I now understand the importance of adhering to Wikipedia's guidelines, including WP and the disruption my edits caused.

I have reviewed the relevant policies thoroughly and am committed to constructive editing. I will ensure my edits are based on reliable sources, avoid making unsupported connections or engaging in original research, and always engage in discussions with other editors to reach consensus.

I humbly request another chance to contribute positively to Wikipedia. I will make every effort to avoid repeating my past mistakes.

Thank you for considering my appeal. JCWoodberry1234 (talk) 19:04, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Block Appeal

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

JCWoodberry1234 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I acknowledge the mistakes I made that led to my block. I regret misusing unreliable sources, adding unsupported categories, and failing to communicate properly with other editors. I now understand the importance of adhering to Wikipedia's guidelines, including WP and the disruption my edits caused. I have reviewed the relevant policies thoroughly and am committed to constructive editing. I will ensure my edits are based on reliable sources, avoid making unsupported connections or engaging in original research, and always engage in discussions with other editors to reach consensus. I humbly request another chance to contribute positively to Wikipedia. I will make every effort to avoid repeating my past mistakes. Thank you for considering my appeal. JCWoodberry1234 (talk) 19:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I acknowledge the mistakes I made that led to my block. I regret misusing unreliable sources, adding unsupported categories, and failing to communicate properly with other editors. I now understand the importance of adhering to Wikipedia's guidelines, including WP and the disruption my edits caused. I have reviewed the relevant policies thoroughly and am committed to constructive editing. I will ensure my edits are based on reliable sources, avoid making unsupported connections or engaging in original research, and always engage in discussions with other editors to reach consensus. I humbly request another chance to contribute positively to Wikipedia. I will make every effort to avoid repeating my past mistakes. Thank you for considering my appeal. [[User:JCWoodberry1234|JCWoodberry1234]] ([[User talk:JCWoodberry1234#top|talk]]) 19:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I acknowledge the mistakes I made that led to my block. I regret misusing unreliable sources, adding unsupported categories, and failing to communicate properly with other editors. I now understand the importance of adhering to Wikipedia's guidelines, including WP and the disruption my edits caused. I have reviewed the relevant policies thoroughly and am committed to constructive editing. I will ensure my edits are based on reliable sources, avoid making unsupported connections or engaging in original research, and always engage in discussions with other editors to reach consensus. I humbly request another chance to contribute positively to Wikipedia. I will make every effort to avoid repeating my past mistakes. Thank you for considering my appeal. [[User:JCWoodberry1234|JCWoodberry1234]] ([[User talk:JCWoodberry1234#top|talk]]) 19:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I acknowledge the mistakes I made that led to my block. I regret misusing unreliable sources, adding unsupported categories, and failing to communicate properly with other editors. I now understand the importance of adhering to Wikipedia's guidelines, including WP and the disruption my edits caused. I have reviewed the relevant policies thoroughly and am committed to constructive editing. I will ensure my edits are based on reliable sources, avoid making unsupported connections or engaging in original research, and always engage in discussions with other editors to reach consensus. I humbly request another chance to contribute positively to Wikipedia. I will make every effort to avoid repeating my past mistakes. Thank you for considering my appeal. [[User:JCWoodberry1234|JCWoodberry1234]] ([[User talk:JCWoodberry1234#top|talk]]) 19:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

JCWoodberry1234 (talk) 19:22, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you give me some examples of reliable sources you would use, and what edits you would make? ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 21:22, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Some examples of reliable sources include:

Academic Journals:
Books: Scholarly books, particularly those published by well-known academic publishers.
Reputable News Outlets: Established media organizations
Government Websites: Official publications and reports
Professional Organizations and Institutions: Publications or reports from recognized institutions.
Specialized Websites: Websites that are focused on a specific area of expertise.

Edits I would make are when a certain piece of fiction is set in what year. JCWoodberry1234 (talk) 13:58, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm looking for specific edits and sources, not LLM generated explanations. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:04, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

a specific edit example of the edits I would like to make:

A movie/video game/book/etc has a category: fiction set in 2003, I would change it to movie/video game/book/etc set it 2003. If not, it would be: movie/video game/book/etc set in the 2000s JCWoodberry1234 (talk) 20:26, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What specific edit, based on what specific sources, please. -- asilvering (talk) 02:44, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I mean as if if a book on Wikipedia has the category: fiction set in 1993, I would add Novels set in the 1990s JCWoodberry1234 (talk) 16:59, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]