User talk:Hornstrandir1
Welcome!
[edit]Hi Hornstrandir1! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing! Vsmith (talk) 13:00, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 7
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fossa (river), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eastern Region (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:20, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
Sorry, I'll check this out.Hornstrandir1 (talk) 07:22, 7 June 2020 (UTC) Done. - I also think, we should change this and install a disambiguation page for these rivers and also is the name of the river not correct, it should be Fossá. The accent can give a different meaning.Hornstrandir1 (talk) 07:26, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
Lytle
[edit]Hi, I have been slowly working my way around the Great Plains geology and have been noticing your work in the Categories. I don't know if you have local knowledge of the Lytle, and judging from your contribution patterns, maybe not. But, I was wondering and thought that I would ask anyway. Well, thank you for finding and adding that image. I would love a close up of the Lytle to compare with samples I found in the Kansas River. IveGoneAway (talk) 02:00, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
- You are of course welcome to do that.Hornstrandir1 (talk) 06:34, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
- I was just fishing whether you had such a thing. I live clear t'other end of the Dakota. I was only ever at the Dinosaur Ridge once, well before starting on Wikipedia. IveGoneAway (talk) 12:31, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 11
[edit]An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Ortiz porphyry belt (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Porphyry and South Mountain
- Polvadera Group (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Inclusion
- Tesuque Formation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Conglomerate
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:37, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
- Sorry, didn't check this first. I corrected it now.Hornstrandir1 (talk) 07:17, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 18
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sólheimajökull, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Katla (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- Corrected this.Hornstrandir1 (talk) 08:41, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
An article you recently created, Andakilsá, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 12:26, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Andakilsá has been accepted
[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Bkissin (talk) 20:50, 29 July 2020 (UTC)Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
[edit] Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Rauðhólar into Rauðhólar (Reykjavík). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 21:40, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you for the advice, I'll keep it in mind.Hornstrandir1 (talk) 08:31, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 30
[edit]An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:49, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 6
[edit]An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Subglacial eruption
- added a link pointing to Katla
- Subglacial volcano
- added a link pointing to Katla
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:26, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Myndbreytingarbergsfræði
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Myndbreytingarbergsfræði requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Koridas 📣 16:42, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you, good to know.Hornstrandir1 (talk) 16:45, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
The article Volcanic systems dof Iceland has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Recently created redirect, not a plausible typo
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TJRC (talk) 16:31, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
- Just a typo.Hornstrandir1 (talk) 16:45, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Disasters and accidents in Iceland
[edit]A tag has been placed on Category:Disasters and accidents in Iceland requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:14, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
- It's ok to delete that, I found instead the more precise Category:Disasters in Iceland.Hornstrandir1 (talk) 09:00, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 27
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Grímsvötn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vent.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you. I'll correct that.Hornstrandir1 (talk) 12:38, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
Hello!
[edit]Hi! When you want to change the title of a page, please go to WP:RM. Do not just copy and paste. Red Slash 18:15, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you. Hornstrandir1 (talk) 19:46, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
- As the move was reverted. I hadn't seen that a discussion had ended with a no to a move, I restarted the discussion, because I really think it is important to have names right in the languages of the country as far as possible.
So I set this text on the discussion page of Theistareykjarbunga:
{{subst:Theistareykjarbunga|Þeistareykjarbunga|reason=I'd like to restart the discussion as my transfer was reverted.
As was mentioned in the discussion above, Icelandic writing should be preferred, and just set in links from English orthography, which is no problem to do. I did this eg. with my page Þorbjörn (mountain), where I used Icelandic writing and there was no objection to this.
Also in the literature or volcano monitoring webpages like the ones in English from Icelandic Met Office, the names are written in Icelandic though the text may be in English. See: [1] . Here the name of our volcano in question is written Þeistareykir (which would be the volcanic system in comparison to Þeistareykjarbunga which is the name of the central volcano). The same is the case for this page from University of Iceland [2]. The volcanic system is also written Þeistareykir in the book Thor Thordarson, A. Hoskuldsson: Iceland. Classic geology of Europe 3. Harpenden 2002, eg. p.14. The same authors also write it like this in the paper "Postglacial volcanism of Iceland" of 2007 (PDF) [3] And in the Catalogue of Icelandic Volcanoes by Icelandic Met Office and University of Iceland: [4] Click on TEY. Hornstrandir1 (talk) 20:26, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 22
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Geology of Reykjanes Peninsula, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IMO.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:26, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]Admire Merge
[edit]I have been thinking of suggesting/requesting that you merge Admire Formation into Admire Group. They are the same unit. Group is the USGS usage over the range from OK to NE. However, it is not unknown for Flint Hills units to drop in local (state) rank as they pinch out southward into OK. Both Group and Formation rank are applied in OK, but take care as membership and Period was unstable until even the 80s or 90s. IveGoneAway (talk) 00:24, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
- Could be a good idea to do so. Hornstrandir1 (talk) 01:37, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
- I have done it several times for mid-continental units of the Cretaceous and Permian by referencing Geolex. If I were to find significant use of a different rank or membership, I would work it into the article. I have seen one case of the Admire Formation rank limited to Oklahoma with completely different members, but I don't know if it is current usage. IveGoneAway (talk) 02:17, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
- Regrettably, I don't know this neither.Hornstrandir1 (talk) 02:21, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
- I have done it several times for mid-continental units of the Cretaceous and Permian by referencing Geolex. If I were to find significant use of a different rank or membership, I would work it into the article. I have seen one case of the Admire Formation rank limited to Oklahoma with completely different members, but I don't know if it is current usage. IveGoneAway (talk) 02:17, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 5
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Iles Formation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Formation.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- Good that you warned me, just corrected it.Hornstrandir1 (talk) 07:37, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 18
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Diamond Peak Formation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conglomerate.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:34, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Mixed eruptions
[edit]A tag has been placed on Category:Mixed eruptions requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 16:40, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- Good to let me know, but as I said on the discussion page about it, at the moment, I don't have the time to write articles in Wikipedia myself ... Hornstrandir1 (talk) 19:06, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- Categories deleted because they are empty can be recreated when they can be used. You can recreate it yourself, go to WP:REFUND or contact an administrator. Liz Read! Talk! 18:52, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 14
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Paradox Formation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pennsylvanian.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:28, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
La Soufriere
[edit]Hi, why did you briefly replaced the word December with Décembre on Draft:2020-21 La Soufrière eruptions.DachshundLover82 (talk) 13:13, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry, just an error.Hornstrandir1 (talk) 13:14, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
Edit summaries and minor edits
[edit]In the majority of edits you make, you do not leave an edit summary. I see that you mark a large fraction of your edits as minor, and in many that I've checked, this was not correct. For example:
- [5] - introduces new facts (and is also not written in anything resembling correct English)
- [6] - changes facts
- [7] - adds new claims without providing a citation
You should only mark edits as minor if you did something like fixed a typo or some formatting, not when you change the substance of the article in some way. And you should always leave an edit summary. Trople (talk) 17:09, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
- I see ...
1st example: Should I have mentioned a map in the first case? The mountain is situated directly behind the Blue Lagoon/Svartsengi Power Station. 2nd: I took over the indication from below (same page).Hornstrandir1 (talk) 17:30, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
- I do not know what relevance a map has to marking a non-minor edit as minor, nor what you mean by "took over the indication from below". Like I say, the issue is that a minor edit would be one that does not change the substance of the article at all; those were not minor edits. Trople (talk) 06:58, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
- I understand. I'll give more information (Edit summary) next time.07:05, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you. Other editors will greatly appreciate it. Trople (talk) 11:51, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
- I understand. I'll give more information (Edit summary) next time.07:05, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 4
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of Sussex County, New Jersey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lafayette Township.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:28, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Subglacial calderas in Alaska
[edit]A tag has been placed on Category:Subglacial calderas in Alaska indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 15:21, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Subglacial calderas in Alaska
[edit]A tag has been placed on Category:Subglacial calderas in Alaska indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 15:43, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Subglacial volcanoes of Alaska
[edit]A tag has been placed on Category:Subglacial volcanoes of Alaska indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 16:30, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
- It's okay, if you delete it.Hornstrandir1 (talk) 16:59, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 18
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Martinez Formation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Calabasas.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
Red link categories
[edit]Hello, Hornstrandir1,
Please do not add nonexistent, red link categories to any pages on Wikipedia. According to policy, WP:REDNO, red link categories either need to be removed from the page or the category needs to be created and placed within the existing Wikipedia category structure. So, if you add them to a page, another editor must come around and then remove them & undo your edit. So, please do not add red link categories unless you plan on immediately creating a category page for them. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 00:46, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry, what is a red link category?Hornstrandir1 (talk) 14:06, 21 November 2021 (UTC) I see, you mean categories that do not (yet) exist. - Ok, won't do that again.Hornstrandir1 (talk) 14:08, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Category:Disaster prevention in Iceland has been nominated for deletion
[edit]Category:Disaster prevention in Iceland has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Estopedist1 (talk) 10:30, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
- This is ok with me. No problem.Hornstrandir1 (talk) 10:41, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Feeder dikes
[edit]A tag has been placed on Category:Feeder dikes indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 04:50, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 19 November 2024 (UTC)