User talk:Hoponpop69/Archive4

Copyright violation in Dan Schafer

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Dan Schafer, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Dan Schafer is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Dan Schafer, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 03:30, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Steven Joseph Christopher

I have nominated Steven Joseph Christopher, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steven Joseph Christopher. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.  – iridescent 20:56, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

AFI

It's also worth noting that allmusic continues to list hardcore punk as one of their genres throughout their releases all the way up to today. It notes an increasingly wide spectrum of influences, but nevertheless, according to that source they are still playing hardcore punk. If you can provide sources that contradict it, that say "They don't still play hardcore punk", then you've got a case. Prophaniti (talk) 20:28, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

All music is an unreliable sack of shit for music genres. Here are multiple sources saying they are no longer a Hardcore punk band [1][2][3][4] Hoponpop69 (talk) 03:42, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Hoponpop, even if they no longer write/market 'hardcore punk' those songs still exist, and are by the band. Therefore, the genre still fits. Landon1980 (talk) 04:27, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Yes the genre still belongs on the page but not in the intro sentence. The Beastie Boys were once a hardcore band, those songs still exist, but their intro sentence does not describe them as a hardcore punk band because like AFI they now primarily play a different genre of music.Hoponpop69 (talk) 16:26, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Tune in, Tokyo...

I have nominated Tune in, Tokyo..., an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tune in, Tokyo.... Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Timmeh!_{(review me)} 21:09, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

List of Offspring band members

I left a message about the prog tag on the List of Offspring band members article on the talk page. Alex (talk) 02:28, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Coffin Caddies

A tag has been placed on Coffin Caddies requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Cazbahrocker (talk) 23:53, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Your tagging of record labels

Hoponpop69, please do not re-tag articles once a speedy-delete has already been declined. Also, please be aware that a record label does not have to be clearly notable (per WP:N) to escape a speedy, it only has to have some assertion of significance or importance. Most of the articles you are tagging would need an AfD discussion before they could be deleted. Thanks, Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 03:22, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

TNSrecords

Hoponpop69,

You have twice marked the TNSrecords article not notable, first in December 2008, and second in June 2009, twice it was rejected almost immediately, most recently by user "Paul Erik". What's more, when I created the article (having been surprised that no article already existed) I recieved the following message "I have no concerns that notability criteria have been met. " from user "LittleOldMe" when we discussed notability.

I must ask why you seem sop adamant to have the article, which clearly no one else has an issue with, deleted?

Mozza1979 (talk) 08:10, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Did I Do That? Hoponpop69 (talk) 22:27, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

List of Ramones concerts

• Hi, thanks for adding the Lollapalooza dates to the article. Do you have a reference for them? All of the previous dates all came from the same source and the hope was that more references would be added as time went on, this was the main concern when it was an AfD. Thanks J04n(talk page) 14:57, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

Got it from here [5]. Not sure if that is considered a reliable source or not.Hoponpop69 (talk) 15:59, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, there is no way to tell if the Ramones were even actually at each show. I'll see if I can find something better. Thanks J04n(talk page) 16:46, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

Art punk and Avant-punk

Neither of these articles is on my watch list currently, and, frankly, I wash my hands of them. ---RepublicanJacobite_{The'FortyFive'} 03:50, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

My point is that I am past caring. ---RepublicanJacobite_{The'FortyFive'} 22:47, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Dude

Chill. --Closedmouth (talk) 15:29, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Can you?

In the page Emo you appear to have made a Revision as of 12:48, 1 September 2009. You added text and some references. One of those reference tags, <ref name="allmusic"/> appears to be causing a cite error. Could you please go back and fill out the full source to fix the cite error. Thanks. 75.69.0.58 (talk) 21:35, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Done.Hoponpop69 (talk) 03:12, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: At the Wake

Hello Hoponpop69, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I declined the speedy deletion of At the Wake - a page you tagged - because: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. decltype (talk) 16:03, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Classics Of Love

A tag has been placed on Classics Of Love requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Alastair Rae (talk) 15:02, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: The Motorettes

Hello Hoponpop69, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I declined the speedy deletion of The Motorettes - a page you tagged - because: national tour, notable label, co-headlining with notable band, hit single = credible assertions of significance. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know.  Skomorokh, barbarian  19:53, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Crashcarburn

Hello Hoponpop69, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I declined the speedy deletion of Crashcarburn - a page you tagged - because: Album produced by grammy award winners, and numerous media promotions/appearances is probably enough to get through CSD. PROD or take to AfD if required. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. GedUK  15:32, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: New Adventures (band)

Hello Hoponpop69, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I declined the speedy deletion of New Adventures (band) - a page you tagged - because: was de-prodded before by experienced editor claiming coverage in reliable sources. Use WP:AFD instead if deletion is needed . Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. SoWhy 16:32, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Revolver (French band)

Hello Hoponpop69, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I declined the speedy deletion of Revolver (French band) - a page you tagged - because: Appear to be signed to EMI which is enough tosave from speedy. Suggest WP:AFD as the appropriate forum. . Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. Nancy ^talk 18:47, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Removal of PROD from Made of Hate

Hello Hoponpop69, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD template you added to Made of Hate has been removed. It was removed by Chubbles with the following edit summary 'contest; assertions of notability made, AFM releases. Tag for tone.'. Please consider discussing your concerns with Chubbles before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to send the article to AfD for community discussion. Thank you, SDPatrolBot (talk) 19:49, 27 November 2009 (UTC) (Learn how to opt out of these messages) 19:49, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

If You Will

Since you PRODded this, FYI: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/If You Will. --Glenfarclas (talk) 04:07, 21 December 2009 (UTC)