User talk:Honesteditsvj

Your submission at Articles for creation: IndianMoney.com (July 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:IndianMoney.com and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:IndianMoney.com, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:19, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Honesteditsvj! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:19, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

Draft:IndianMoney.com concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:IndianMoney.com, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:37, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:IndianMoney.com

Hello, Honesteditsvj. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "IndianMoney.com".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 09:44, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Mithun Vijay Kumar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mithun Vijay Kumar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mithun Vijay Kumar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Mvqr (talk) 12:04, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

The profile adheres to all the guidelines of Wikipedia and hence a deletion is not recommended. The profile in question is of a public figure with credible track record of presenting men's rights and right aligned ideological viewpoints in various media platforms. Over a hundred discussion links are available to substantiate this claim. The citations added are from leading news platforms in the state and is in no way a paid promotion of the person. He is infact being seen questioned for the ideas he represensts. The books of this author is available on every leading bookstore including online stores such as Amazon, Walmart and Flipkat.

Honesteditsvj (talk) 12:22, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

A star performer recognised by the country's prime minister's office is certainly a notable person with a credible track record. Honesteditsvj (talk) 12:36, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

May 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Mithun Vijay Kumar. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Mvqr (talk) 12:29, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Sorry, I was unable to see the comments that followed and only saw the "undo" option. Kindly ignore the action. Thank you. Honesteditsvj (talk) 13:31, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Mithun Vijay Kumar, you may be blocked from editing. Shellwood (talk) 12:39, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

I was editing from a basic phone and got confused when a user named chatbot or something made a change. I thought it's a bot making changes to a page cited with credible sources from the news medium in the country. Hence undid the changes that appeared. Honesteditsvj (talk) 13:36, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Mithun Vijay Kumar. --MuZemike 13:16, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

I was editing from a basic phone and got confused when a user named chatbot or something made a change. I thought it's a bot making changes to a page cited with credible sources from the news medium in the country. Hence undid the changes that appeared. Honesteditsvj (talk) 13:36, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Your edit at Aju Varghese article

Hello I'm Eagle Site. When you edited Aju Varghese's page, all the movies to be released were deleted and it has not been retrieved. If you are a beginner to WP editing, Please read the guidelines at Wikipedia:GLAM/Beginner's guide to Wikipedia. Thank you. Eagle Site (talk) 20:06, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

Two Men (2022 film) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Two Men (2022 film), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:12, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

Conflict of interest notice

Hello, Honesteditsvj. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Aju Varghese, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 09:03, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Two Men (2022 film)

Hello, Honesteditsvj. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Two Men (2022 film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 2 March 2023 (UTC)