User talk:Homerico75

This is Homerico75's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aren Perdeci (September 21)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Too much of the content is unsupported, eg. the 'Early life and education' section hasn't a single citation; likewise, the DOB is unreferenced.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aren Perdeci and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:27, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Homerico75! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:27, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aren Perdeci (January 9)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 97198 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aren Perdeci and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

97198 (talk) 06:56, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Before all, I would like to state an important fact. The work of the director has been selected by the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences' Margaret Herrick Library's Core Collection in 2016. Therefore, I ask that admins think twice before stating whether subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. This is disrespectful.

Initial review done on Sep. 21, 2022 stated that the article was missing references even for DOB. For this reason, we rewrote the article all with references. All references are from reliable independent sources which have been written in the article.

Please show examples supporting your statement, otherwise we will resubmit it again. Homerico75 (talk) 15:47, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Aren Perdeci[edit]

Hello, Homerico75. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Aren Perdeci, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:05, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Aren Perdeci[edit]

Hello, Homerico75. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Aren Perdeci".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:02, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Aren Perdeci has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Aren Perdeci. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 10:38, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]