User talk:Herz123

This is Herz123's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rowan Cunliffe (July 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MicrobiologyMarcus was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rowan Cunliffe and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

microbiologyMarcus ^{[petri dish·growths]} 20:09, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Herz123! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! microbiologyMarcus ^{[petri dish·growths]} 20:09, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Herz123

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Herz123, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — Sagotreespirit (^talk) 21:55, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Attribution

Hey, I hope you are doing well. I wanted to let you know why I reverted your creation of Lisa Swain (Coronation Street) - this is because the content was copied from List of Coronation Street characters (2021) without attribution, which is extremely unfair to the editors who added that content (including myself) and is required (see WP:Copying within Wikipedia). Additionally, the article did not really meet notability guidelines in its current state - Lisa's character is notable but the article needed more reception and information.

Additionally, I also reverted Lizzie Chen-Williams as most of the content was taken from List of Hollyoaks characters (2021) without attribution. I also noticed that some sentence were taken from a page I created - Honour Chen-Williams - without attribution too (with the exact same sentences, ref names, ref dates etc). This is extremely unfair to editors who put the hard work, so please refrain that from doing so in the future. I have noticed that the same issue - of content being taken from other pages - is present in your sandboxes/works in progress too, and this is just cause further trouble.

Please let me know if you have any questions at all. DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 00:48, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good afternoon

Thank you for contacting me and I apologise if I have breeched the rules with my post. Please could you give me some advice on how to go about correcting this, and any useful tips. I am very keen to learn more so I can continue with Wikipedia posts, it’s something I am very interested in and I’m currently studying media as part of my A levels.

many thanks Herz123 (talk) 14:49, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Lisa Swain.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lisa Swain.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Lizzie Chen-Williams.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lizzie Chen-Williams.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Kyle.sivvenxo per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kyle.sivvenxo. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. The Wordsmith^{Talk to me} 19:51, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have only been on Wikipedia for a few weeks I have not made any other account but this one, I don’t even know who Kyle.sivvennxo is I don’t see what I have done wrong, so is there a way to be unblocked. Herz123 (talk) 19:55, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]