User talk:Haydenthegreat
August 2011
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Alaska Airlines Flight 261, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
- Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Alaska Airlines Flight 261 was changed by Haydenthegreat (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.979743 on 2011-08-04T05:53:26+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:53, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
- I have reverted the article back to ClueBot's version, please see Talk:Alaska_Airlines_Flight_261#Cockpit_voice_recording. --Moralis (talk) 06:11, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
- I've reverted the article once again. As I have explained my rationale both on the article's talk page and in my edit summary, I would request that you discuss it with other editors before restoring the content. I appreciate that you want to contribute to the encyclopedia, but this transcript is not appropriate for a Wikipedia article as it stands. Please be advised of WP:3RR, as well. Another editor has suggested that the content in question may be more appropriate for Wikisource; I'm inclined to agree. --Moralis (talk) 06:28, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
- I see that you have once again restored the content in question. I appreciate that you have formatted it more coherently; however, I still question whether it's appropriate in a Wikipedia article. I asked you to discuss this with other editors prior to restoring it because I think it's important that we get other peoples' input. Wikisource really seems like a better place for a transcript of a cockpit voice recording; furthermore, I am unsure how copyright comes into play here, and you have not provided a source for the transcript. So far you haven't communicated with me, and I would appreciate it if you'd enter into this discussion. Simply continuing to revert something you disagree with, without discussion, is usually referred to as edit warring, and while I would like to assume good faith, I feel I should inform you that edit warring is a punishable offense. I'm going to ask for some community input on this; please abide by whatever decision is reached. --Moralis (talk) 06:45, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
- I've reverted the article once again. As I have explained my rationale both on the article's talk page and in my edit summary, I would request that you discuss it with other editors before restoring the content. I appreciate that you want to contribute to the encyclopedia, but this transcript is not appropriate for a Wikipedia article as it stands. Please be advised of WP:3RR, as well. Another editor has suggested that the content in question may be more appropriate for Wikisource; I'm inclined to agree. --Moralis (talk) 06:28, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
3RR
[edit] You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Alaska Airlines Flight 261. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.
In particular, the three-revert rule states that:
- Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. BilCat (talk) 09:28, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
[edit]You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ryan kirkpatrick. Thank you. YSSYguy (talk) 23:35, 8 August 2011 (UTC)