User talk:Hasan313

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.
Hasan313 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))
24.68.49.138 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Renegade250". The reason given for Renegade250's block is: "vandalism, edit warring".


Decline reason: Given the similar interests in the Balkans and DJ Rennagade‎, there's too much evidence suggesting that you are the same people for me to clear this autoblock. Sorry.— chaser - t 11:04, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hasan313 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

My brother's account has nothing to do with me and I should not be held responsible for his actions. I will make sure he ceases to vandalize anything else on the website.

Decline reason:

This account isn't directly blocked, the template above is the one used when dealing with autoblocks. — - Caribbean~H.Q. 06:29, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Possibly unfree Image:Rennagade.png[edit]

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Rennagade.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. OsamaK 23:11, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Rennagade237.jpg[edit]

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Rennagade237.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Soundvisions1 (talk) 19:09, 1 November 2008 (UTC) --Soundvisions1 (talk) 19:09, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Hello Hasan313! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 943 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

  1. DJ Rennagade - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:52, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated DJ Rennagade, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DJ Rennagade. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.  --Joshua Scott (LiberalFascist) 00:41, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Werewr.png listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Werewr.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 19:32, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Drenica.png listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Drenica.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Pkbwcgs (talk) 11:10, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:Rennagade313.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Uploaded for DJ Rennagade. No other use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:27, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:Drenica.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, superseded by File:Drenica_region.png.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:10, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]