User talk:Happygilmoregolf

Thank you for experimenting with the page David Tench Tonight on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Ali K 22:42, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:About_bob_01.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:About_bob_01.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:47, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Father Bob McGuire[edit]

You removed my deletion tag. In its current state, the article does not assert notability, although on the talk page you indicate he appears on television etc. Perhaps you could work up the article into a more assertive biography. I will check back in a couple of weeks MNewnham 16:30, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Moniquesunriseweather.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Moniquesunriseweather.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:33, 25 January 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Longhair\^talk 03:33, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Happygilmoregolf, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! -- Longhair\^talk 03:33, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Bendigo bank.png[edit]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Bendigo bank.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:59, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Little context in AROC[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on AROC, by Teh tennisman, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because AROC is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting AROC, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate AROC itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 04:51, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Neil Reilly[edit]

Neil Reilly, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Neil Reilly satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neil Reilly and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Neil Reilly during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Mattinbgn\^talk 22:47, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]