User talk:Hanako

Welcome!

Hello, Hanako, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! JoJan 15:19, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a newness thing. Check out Wikipedia:Notability for how the policies work. --DMG413 23:15, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re:House of Prayer... it probably looked to an editor like a non-notable church, as it did to me until I started with the provided URL and dug deeper into the history. Ronabop 01:14, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: New Testament Christian Churches of America, Inc vandalism[edit]

Hey, you are very welcome. Best, Gwernol 22:03, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mediation[edit]

I've decided to take the case about New Testament Christian Churches of America, Inc for mediation. Please indicate below if you agree with me being the mediatior so we can start. -- ( drini's page ☎ ) 16:56, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I agree. Thank you. Hanako 18:14, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, Tyworld hasn't showed up, so maybe we can start with only you and Wwjd2009. However, he felts that mediation is no longer needed as there has been plenty of dialog between the parties and things are being sorted out. What's your opinion about that? -- ( drini's page ☎ ) 03:41, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:MaryWinkler mugshot.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:MaryWinkler mugshot.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. - Jarry1250 ^{[Humorous? Discuss.]} 12:10, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:MaryWinkler mugshot.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:MaryWinkler mugshot.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. PhilKnight (talk) 12:02, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA reassessment of Ray LaMontagne[edit]

I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. You are being notified as you have made a number of contributions to the article. I have found some concerns which you can see at Talk:Ray LaMontagne/GA1. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 15:18, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of New Testament Christian Churches of America, Inc.[edit]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is New Testament Christian Churches of America, Inc.. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Testament Christian Churches of America, Inc.. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:03, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of House of Prayer Christian Church[edit]

I have nominated House of Prayer Christian Church, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/House of Prayer Christian Church (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Becritical (talk) 18:02, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:44, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Hanako. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Hanako. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]